arrow left
arrow right
  • Reza Mohammadi vs. City of Fresno23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Reza Mohammadi vs. City of Fresno23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Reza Mohammadi vs. City of Fresno23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Reza Mohammadi vs. City of Fresno23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Reza Mohammadi vs. City of Fresno23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • Reza Mohammadi vs. City of Fresno23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 Sean T. O'Rourke, Esq.; SBN 199420 PETRIE LEATH LARRIVEE & O'ROURKE, LLP 2 6051 N. Fresno Street, Suite 110 Fresno, California 93710 RECEIVED 3 Telephone (559) 498-6522 8/18/2021 3:50 PM Facsimile (559) 498-6516 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 4 Email: sorourke@pllolegal.com By: L Peterson, Deputy 5 Attorneys for Defendant, LARRY MATSON (erroneously sued herein as LARRY MATTSON) 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO 9 10 REZA MOHAMMAD! and FARHAN Case No. 16CECG01808 MOHAMMAD! (1st MVA), REZA Action Filed: June 6, 2016 11 MOHAMMAD! (2nd MVA), 12 Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME 13 FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL V. 14 LARRY MATTSON (1st MVA), CITY 15 OF FRESNO and STEVE WALLACE Trial: 09/13/21 (2nd MVA), 16 17 Defendants 18 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on August 19, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 20 501, the Honorable D. Tyler Tharpe presiding at the Fresno County Superior Court, the 21 Application of Defendant, LARRY MATSON for an Order Shortening Time for the hearing 22 on a Motion to Continue the Trial date in this matter, which is currently scheduled for 23 September 13, 2021, was heard. After consideration of the Application, and affording all 24 parties through their counsel of record to be heard, the Court makes the following Order: 25 The Application for an Order shortening time is granted. 26 The hearing date on the Motion to Continue the Trial will be _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2021, 27 at 3:30 p.m. in Department 501 of the above-captioned Court. 28 -1 1 The Motion shall be electronically served on all parties on Friday, August 20, 2021. 2 Any opposition to the Motion must be filed on-------~ 2021. Service 3 may be made by facsimile or electronic mail. 4 The moving party waives any reply, and so there will be none. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: _ _ _ _ __ 7 Honorable D. Tyler Tharpe, 8 Judge of the Superior Court 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO 3 I am employed in the County of Fresno, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 6051 Fresno Street, Suite 4 110, Fresno, California 93710. 5 On August 18, 2021, I served the foregoing document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL on the other parties 6 in this action as follows 7 Jeremy M. Dobbins, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs, 8 1225 E. Divisadero St. REZA MOHAMMAD! and Fresno, CA 93721 FRAHAN MOHAMMAD! 9 Fax: (559) 316-4070 Email : jeremy@jeremymdobbins.com 10 nichole@jeremymdobbins.com 11 Mandy L. Jeffcoach, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants, 12 WHITNEY THOMPSON & JEFFCOACH CITY OF FRESNO and 970 W. Alluvial Ave. STEVE WALLACE 13 Fresno, CA 93711 Fax: (559) 753-2560 14 Email: MJeffcoach@WTJLaw.com 15 16 BY ELECTRONIC DELIVERY: 17 I caused such document to be delivered by electronic means prior to close of business on this same day to the addressee(s) at the electronic notification 18 addressee(s) provided above pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2.260(a). The 19 electronic delivery was reported as completed and without error pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2.260(f). 20 Executed on August 18, 2021, at Fresno, California. 21 22 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. By ~ a£«: ~ 23 24 Jalee Furr 25 26 27 28 -3