On March 14, 2002 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Black, Leslie Kilby 2269 Chestnut Street, Apt.,
S. Handa & Sons, Inc.,
T. Okamoto & Co,
and
Does 1 To 500 Inclusive,
Sakai, Chieko,
Sakai, Tamotsu,
S. Handa & Sons, Inc.,
S. Handa Sons, Inc.,
T. Okamoto & Co,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OMI
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
May-14-2004 10:46 am
Case Number: CGC-02-405626
Filing Date: May-14-2004 10:45
Juke Box: 001 Image: 00956244
ORDER
LESLIE KILBY BLACK VS. TAMOTSU SAKAI et al
001000956244
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oOo IY DH FF YW YN =
NN NN N YN YN YN NY VY | = = om
QRNRRR BRR BE SGe WR BDRE ERTS
FILE RouRy co
E 2, ANCIS'
LAURA L. CHAPMAN, State Bar No. 167805) © wa
NIXON PEABODY LLP c
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2700
San Francisco, CA 94111-3996
Telephone: (415) 984-8200
Facsimile: (415) 984-8300
Attorneys for Defendant
S. HANDA SONS, INC.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
LESLIE KILBY BLACK, Case No. a
Plaintiff, [ ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH AND
vs. FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
TAMOTSU SAKAI; CHIEKO SAKAI; S. Date: May 14, 2004
HANDA & SONS, INC.; T. OKAMOTO & CO.; | Time: 10:30 a.m.
and DOES 1 through 500, inclusive, Dept.: 610
Defendants. Assigned to Commissioner Loretta Norris
Complaint Filed: March 14, 2002
Trial Date: July 6, 2004
This matter came on regularly for hearing on May 14, 2004, before Commissioner Loretta
Norris, in Dept. 610 of the above-entitled court, with appearances by counsel as follows: Thomas
Moore appeared as counsel for plaintiff Leslie Kilby Black, and Laura L. Chapman appeared as
counsel for defendant S. Handa Sons, Inc.
This matter having been fully argued and considered and proof being made to the satisfaction
of the court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motion of plaintiff to quash subpoenas duces
tecum seeking production of financial records and for a protective order prohibiting future discovery
of plaintiff's financial records is denied.
—=a ‘
DATED: far 1¢ 204 fn. lems
Commissioner Loretta Norris
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH . $438699.1
CASE NO. CGC-02-405626Co mY AH B® WKY
bb Ne YY NY WY NY N WN _
BRRRRRBBKRHESVREVABDETBRES
PROOF OF SERVICE
CASE NAME: Leslie Kilby Black v. Tamotsu Sakai, et al.
San Francisco Superior Court
405626
003620.000006
J, the undersigned, certify that ] am employed in the City and County of San Francisco,
California; that I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action; and that my
business address is Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2700, San Francisco, CA 9411 1-3996. On May
3, 2004, I served the following document(s):
[Proposed] Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion To Quash And For A Protective Order
on the parties stated below, through their attorneys of record, by placing true copies thereof in sealed
envelopes addressed as shown below by the following means of service:
__: ByFirst-Class Mail — I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collection and
processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, the correspondence is deposited with
the United States Postal Service on the same day as collected, with first-class postage thereon fully
prepaid, in San Francisco, California, for mailing to the office of the addressee following ordinary
business practices.
__: ByPersonal Service — I caused each such envelope to be given to a courier messenger for
same day personal delivery to the office of the addressees listed below.
_X_: By Ovemight Courier — I caused each such envelope to be given to an overnight mail service
at S.F., California, to be hand delivered to the office of the addressee on the next business day.
__: By Facsimile — From facsimile number (415) 984-8300 at 1:12 PM, I caused each such
document to be transmitted by facsimile machine, to the parties and numbers listed below, pursuant
to Rule 2008. The facsimile machine I used complied with Rule 2003(3) and no error was reported by
the machine. Pursuant to Rule 2008(e)(4), I caused the machine to print a transmission record of the
transmission, a copy of which is attached to the original of this declaration.
Addressee(s
See Attached Service List of Attorneys of Record
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 3,
2004, at San Francisco, California.
Zz
*
Preview
OMI San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-14-2004 10:46 am Case Number: CGC-02-405626 Filing Date: May-14-2004 10:45 Juke Box: 001 Image: 00956244 ORDER LESLIE KILBY BLACK VS. TAMOTSU SAKAI et al 001000956244 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oOo IY DH FF YW YN = NN NN N YN YN YN NY VY | = = om QRNRRR BRR BE SGe WR BDRE ERTS FILE RouRy co E 2, ANCIS' LAURA L. CHAPMAN, State Bar No. 167805) © wa NIXON PEABODY LLP c Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2700 San Francisco, CA 94111-3996 Telephone: (415) 984-8200 Facsimile: (415) 984-8300 Attorneys for Defendant S. HANDA SONS, INC. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LESLIE KILBY BLACK, Case No. a Plaintiff, [ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH AND vs. FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TAMOTSU SAKAI; CHIEKO SAKAI; S. Date: May 14, 2004 HANDA & SONS, INC.; T. OKAMOTO & CO.; | Time: 10:30 a.m. and DOES 1 through 500, inclusive, Dept.: 610 Defendants. Assigned to Commissioner Loretta Norris Complaint Filed: March 14, 2002 Trial Date: July 6, 2004 This matter came on regularly for hearing on May 14, 2004, before Commissioner Loretta Norris, in Dept. 610 of the above-entitled court, with appearances by counsel as follows: Thomas Moore appeared as counsel for plaintiff Leslie Kilby Black, and Laura L. Chapman appeared as counsel for defendant S. Handa Sons, Inc. This matter having been fully argued and considered and proof being made to the satisfaction of the court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motion of plaintiff to quash subpoenas duces tecum seeking production of financial records and for a protective order prohibiting future discovery of plaintiff's financial records is denied. —=a ‘ DATED: far 1¢ 204 fn. lems Commissioner Loretta Norris ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH . $438699.1 CASE NO. CGC-02-405626Co mY AH B® WKY bb Ne YY NY WY NY N WN _ BRRRRRBBKRHESVREVABDETBRES PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NAME: Leslie Kilby Black v. Tamotsu Sakai, et al. San Francisco Superior Court 405626 003620.000006 J, the undersigned, certify that ] am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California; that I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action; and that my business address is Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2700, San Francisco, CA 9411 1-3996. On May 3, 2004, I served the following document(s): [Proposed] Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion To Quash And For A Protective Order on the parties stated below, through their attorneys of record, by placing true copies thereof in sealed envelopes addressed as shown below by the following means of service: __: ByFirst-Class Mail — I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, the correspondence is deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day as collected, with first-class postage thereon fully prepaid, in San Francisco, California, for mailing to the office of the addressee following ordinary business practices. __: ByPersonal Service — I caused each such envelope to be given to a courier messenger for same day personal delivery to the office of the addressees listed below. _X_: By Ovemight Courier — I caused each such envelope to be given to an overnight mail service at S.F., California, to be hand delivered to the office of the addressee on the next business day. __: By Facsimile — From facsimile number (415) 984-8300 at 1:12 PM, I caused each such document to be transmitted by facsimile machine, to the parties and numbers listed below, pursuant to Rule 2008. The facsimile machine I used complied with Rule 2003(3) and no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to Rule 2008(e)(4), I caused the machine to print a transmission record of the transmission, a copy of which is attached to the original of this declaration. Addressee(s See Attached Service List of Attorneys of Record I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 3, 2004, at San Francisco, California. Zz *