On January 01, 1900 a
Court Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Reyes, Anita,
and
Madera Community College Center,
State Center Community College District,
for 23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD
in the District Court of Fresno County.
Preview
DeMaria Law Firm, A.P.C.
Anthony N. DeMaria, #177894
ademaria@demarialawfirm. com
S. Nicole Tucker, #PL-50881 8
sntucker@demarialawfirm. com
1690 W. Shaw Ave. Suite 220
Fresno, California 937 11
Telephone: (559) 206-2410
(559) 570-0 1 26
OOOflQUI-tht—i
Facsimile:
RECEIVED VIA EFILE
Attorneys for Defendant, State Center
Community College District 2/11/2021 2:34 PM
FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
By: J. Nelson, Deputy
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY 0F FRESNO
ANITA REYES, Case No. 19CECG03 826
Plaintiff, [PROPSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT STATE CENTER
v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE ADJUDICATION
DISTRICT, MADERA COMMUNITY
COLLEGE CENTER and DOES 1-20, Date: May 4, 2021
Tlme: 3:30 RM.
Dept.: 403
Defendant.
Action Filed: October 21 ,
201 9
NNNNNNNNNHHu—tu—Iv—t—u—np—aflfl
Trial Date: Julv l9. 2021
Defendant STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT’S (“SCCCD”)
“\IONMAUJNHOoOOQ@UI-§WNHO
(“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Adjudication as to the Third and Fourth Causes of Action of
PlaintiffANITA REYES’ (“Plaintiff”) October 2 1 ,
20 1 9 Complaint came on for regularly scheduled
hearing on May 4, 2021 in Department 403 ofthe Fresno Superior Court.
The Court, having considered all papers submitted by the parties and all evidence and
argument offered at the hearing in support thereof, finds that there is no triable issue of material fact
as to the Third and Fourth Causes of Action and that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter
of law for the following reasons:
Defendant has met its burden in showing that no triable issue of material fact exists as to the
Third and Fourth Causes of Action asserted in Plaintiffs Complaint. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(c).)
1
PROPOSED ORDER
The burden therefore shifted to Plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact.
N (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(2).) Plaintiff has failed to provide sufficient evidence contradicting
exhibits presented by Defendants.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant STATE CENTER COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT’S Motion for Summary Adjudication is GRANTED, and judgment shall be
entered in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff on the Third and Fourth Causes of Action.
\OOOflQM-bm
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
ll
Dated: ,
2021 By:
12 Judge of The Superior Court
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO
At the time 0f service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am
employed in the County of Fresno, State of California. My business address is 1690 W. Shaw
Ave., Suite 220, Fresno, CA 9371 1.
On February 11, 2021, I served true copies 0f the following document(s) described as
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT STATE CENTER COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION on the interested
panics in this action as follows:
Eugenia L. Steele
The Torkzadeh Law Firm
18650 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
eugeniafiDtorklaw.com
allegraQDtorklawcom
claudia@t0rklaw.com
XXX BY MAIL: I enclosed said document(s) in a sealed cnvclopc or package addressed
t0 the persons at the address listed on the Service List and placed the envelope for collection and
mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’s
practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day the
correspondence is placed from collection and mailing itis deposited in the ordinary course 01
business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully pre-paid.
XXX BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Based 0n a court order or an agreement 0f thc
parties to accept electronic service, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons a1 the
electronic service addresses listed above. The electronic service address from which I served the
documents is tmaxwell@demarialawfirm.com.
United of America that the
WW
I declare under penalty ofperjury under the laws of the States
foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a member 0f the bar of this
Court at whose direction the service was made.
Executed on February 11, 2021, at Fresno, California.
Teri MaxWell
Document Filed Date
February 11, 2021
Case Filing Date
January 01, 1900
Category
23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
DeMaria Law Firm, A.P.C. Anthony N. DeMaria, #177894 ademaria@demarialawfirm. com S. Nicole Tucker, #PL-50881 8 sntucker@demarialawfirm. com 1690 W. Shaw Ave. Suite 220 Fresno, California 937 11 Telephone: (559) 206-2410 (559) 570-0 1 26 OOOflQUI-tht—i Facsimile: RECEIVED VIA EFILE Attorneys for Defendant, State Center Community College District 2/11/2021 2:34 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: J. Nelson, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F FRESNO ANITA REYES, Case No. 19CECG03 826 Plaintiff, [PROPSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT STATE CENTER v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE ADJUDICATION DISTRICT, MADERA COMMUNITY COLLEGE CENTER and DOES 1-20, Date: May 4, 2021 Tlme: 3:30 RM. Dept.: 403 Defendant. Action Filed: October 21 , 201 9 NNNNNNNNNHHu—tu—Iv—t—u—np—aflfl Trial Date: Julv l9. 2021 Defendant STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT’S (“SCCCD”) “\IONMAUJNHOoOOQ@UI-§WNHO (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Adjudication as to the Third and Fourth Causes of Action of PlaintiffANITA REYES’ (“Plaintiff”) October 2 1 , 20 1 9 Complaint came on for regularly scheduled hearing on May 4, 2021 in Department 403 ofthe Fresno Superior Court. The Court, having considered all papers submitted by the parties and all evidence and argument offered at the hearing in support thereof, finds that there is no triable issue of material fact as to the Third and Fourth Causes of Action and that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law for the following reasons: Defendant has met its burden in showing that no triable issue of material fact exists as to the Third and Fourth Causes of Action asserted in Plaintiffs Complaint. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(c).) 1 PROPOSED ORDER The burden therefore shifted to Plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact. N (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(2).) Plaintiff has failed to provide sufficient evidence contradicting exhibits presented by Defendants. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT’S Motion for Summary Adjudication is GRANTED, and judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff on the Third and Fourth Causes of Action. \OOOflQM-bm IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 ll Dated: , 2021 By: 12 Judge of The Superior Court 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PROPOSED ORDER PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO At the time 0f service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Fresno, State of California. My business address is 1690 W. Shaw Ave., Suite 220, Fresno, CA 9371 1. On February 11, 2021, I served true copies 0f the following document(s) described as [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION on the interested panics in this action as follows: Eugenia L. Steele The Torkzadeh Law Firm 18650 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92612 eugeniafiDtorklaw.com allegraQDtorklawcom claudia@t0rklaw.com XXX BY MAIL: I enclosed said document(s) in a sealed cnvclopc or package addressed t0 the persons at the address listed on the Service List and placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’s practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day the correspondence is placed from collection and mailing itis deposited in the ordinary course 01 business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully pre-paid. XXX BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Based 0n a court order or an agreement 0f thc parties to accept electronic service, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons a1 the electronic service addresses listed above. The electronic service address from which I served the documents is tmaxwell@demarialawfirm.com. United of America that the WW I declare under penalty ofperjury under the laws of the States foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a member 0f the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on February 11, 2021, at Fresno, California. Teri MaxWell