Preview
DeMaria Law Firm, A.P.C.
Anthony N. DeMaria, #177894
ademaria@demarialawfirm.com
S. Nicole Tucker, #PL-5088 1 8
sntucker@demarialawfirm.com
1690 W. Shaw Ave. Suite 220
Fresno, California 93711
Telephone: (559) 206-2410
(559) 570-0126
\DOONGLIIhbJNh—fi
Facsimile:
Attorneys for Defendant, State Center RECEIVED
Community College District 5/28/2021 4:00 PM
FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
By: C. York, Deputy
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF FRESNO
ANITA REYES, Case No. 19CECG03 826
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL
V.
STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
DISTRICT, MADERA COMMUNITY
COLLEGE CENTER and DOES 1-20,
Defendant.
OOflQUI-RWN—IOWOONGUIAUJNU—‘O
The parties, through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
NNNNNNNNNflfl~HHHHH-
l. That the parties desire to hold a second mediation on this case in order to attempt a resolution
of the case and will do so in the summer of 2021.
2. That there is good cause to continue the trial of this matter in order to allow the California
Supreme Court to issue a decision in the case of B. (Brennan) v. S.C., 480 P.3d 1199 (Cal.
2021), which is a main subject of the pending motion for summary adjudication by the
defendant, and which could cause appealable issues if the court were to rule on the motion
at current and proceed to trial before the California Supreme Court issues itsruling.
3. That there is good cause to continue the hearing of the motion for summary adjudication in
this case, currently set for June 3, 2021, as the California Supreme Court has taken the case
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
ofB‘ (Brannon) v. S.C., 480 P.3d 1199 (Cal. 2021), under review, with the briefing schedule
just beginning, and that case decision will be a determining factor in the ruling of this court
0n the motion for summary adjudication.
4. Therefore, the parties agree lo continue the trial date in this case t0 a date t0 be selected by
the court after the court sets this matter for anew Case Management Conference to select
the new trial date, and that all discovery cut off dates and motion dates, including the date
to disclose experts, shall be continued and extended up to the dates prescribed by the Code
of Civil Procedure as the cut off and disclosure dates for the newly set trial date once this
court sets a new date, with the new trial dale t0 be considered the original trialdate for all
10 purposes.
11
12 Dated: May L_g, 2021 DeMaria Law Firm, A.P.C.
13
14
BV:
'
///L/
15 Anthony N. DeMaria
S. Nicole Tucker, Provisionally Licensed Lawyer
16 Attorneys for Defendant, STATE CENTER
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
17
18
19
Dated: May _, 28 2021 THE TORKZADEH LAW FIRM
20
21 14y...—
fada“, p I
22
BV:
v Tracy R. I-Iom
23
Attorneys for Plaintiff, ANITA REYES
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Q&Dfl
ADJN IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, based upon the stipulation of counsel and the fact that the
case of B. (Brennan) v. S.C., 480 P.3d 1199 (Cal. 2021) is stillpending before the California
Supreme Court, and good cause appearing therefore:
1. The trial date in this case of July 19, 2021 , and the Mandatory Settlement Conference date
\OOOQO‘sUI
in this case of June 24, 2021, and the Trial Readiness Hearing in this case of July 16, 2021,
are hereby vacated.
2. This case shall be set for trial at a new Case Management Conference hearing to be set by
10 this court, with all discovery cut off dates and motion dates, including the date to disclose
11 experts, continued and extended up to the dates prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure
12 as the cut off and disclosure dates for the newly set trial date once this court sets a new date,
13 with the new trial date to be considered the original trial date for all purposes.
14 3. The hearing of the pending motion for summary adjudication filed by defendant shall be
15 continued to a future date consistent with the new trial date to be set by this court.
16
17 Date:
Judge of the Superior Court
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Preview
DeMaria Law Firm, A.P.C. Anthony N. DeMaria, #177894 ademaria@demarialawfirm.com S. Nicole Tucker, #PL-5088 1 8 sntucker@demarialawfirm.com 1690 W. Shaw Ave. Suite 220 Fresno, California 93711 Telephone: (559) 206-2410 (559) 570-0126 \DOONGLIIhbJNh—fi Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant, State Center RECEIVED Community College District 5/28/2021 4:00 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. York, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO ANITA REYES, Case No. 19CECG03 826 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL V. STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, MADERA COMMUNITY COLLEGE CENTER and DOES 1-20, Defendant. OOflQUI-RWN—IOWOONGUIAUJNU—‘O The parties, through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: NNNNNNNNNflfl~HHHHH- l. That the parties desire to hold a second mediation on this case in order to attempt a resolution of the case and will do so in the summer of 2021. 2. That there is good cause to continue the trial of this matter in order to allow the California Supreme Court to issue a decision in the case of B. (Brennan) v. S.C., 480 P.3d 1199 (Cal. 2021), which is a main subject of the pending motion for summary adjudication by the defendant, and which could cause appealable issues if the court were to rule on the motion at current and proceed to trial before the California Supreme Court issues itsruling. 3. That there is good cause to continue the hearing of the motion for summary adjudication in this case, currently set for June 3, 2021, as the California Supreme Court has taken the case 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER ofB‘ (Brannon) v. S.C., 480 P.3d 1199 (Cal. 2021), under review, with the briefing schedule just beginning, and that case decision will be a determining factor in the ruling of this court 0n the motion for summary adjudication. 4. Therefore, the parties agree lo continue the trial date in this case t0 a date t0 be selected by the court after the court sets this matter for anew Case Management Conference to select the new trial date, and that all discovery cut off dates and motion dates, including the date to disclose experts, shall be continued and extended up to the dates prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure as the cut off and disclosure dates for the newly set trial date once this court sets a new date, with the new trial dale t0 be considered the original trialdate for all 10 purposes. 11 12 Dated: May L_g, 2021 DeMaria Law Firm, A.P.C. 13 14 BV: ' ///L/ 15 Anthony N. DeMaria S. Nicole Tucker, Provisionally Licensed Lawyer 16 Attorneys for Defendant, STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 17 18 19 Dated: May _, 28 2021 THE TORKZADEH LAW FIRM 20 21 14y...— fada“, p I 22 BV: v Tracy R. I-Iom 23 Attorneys for Plaintiff, ANITA REYES 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER Q&Dfl ADJN IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, based upon the stipulation of counsel and the fact that the case of B. (Brennan) v. S.C., 480 P.3d 1199 (Cal. 2021) is stillpending before the California Supreme Court, and good cause appearing therefore: 1. The trial date in this case of July 19, 2021 , and the Mandatory Settlement Conference date \OOOQO‘sUI in this case of June 24, 2021, and the Trial Readiness Hearing in this case of July 16, 2021, are hereby vacated. 2. This case shall be set for trial at a new Case Management Conference hearing to be set by 10 this court, with all discovery cut off dates and motion dates, including the date to disclose 11 experts, continued and extended up to the dates prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure 12 as the cut off and disclosure dates for the newly set trial date once this court sets a new date, 13 with the new trial date to be considered the original trial date for all purposes. 14 3. The hearing of the pending motion for summary adjudication filed by defendant shall be 15 continued to a future date consistent with the new trial date to be set by this court. 16 17 Date: Judge of the Superior Court 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER