On January 01, 1900 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Reyes, Anita,
and
Madera Community College Center,
State Center Community College District,
for 23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD
in the District Court of Fresno County.
Preview
E-FILED
DeMaria Law Finn, A.P.C. 5/3/2021 9:24 AM
Anthony N. DeMaria, #1 77894 Superior Court of California
ademaria@demarialawfirm.com County of Fresno
1690 W. Shaw Ave. Suite 220
By: E Alvarado, Deputy
Fresno, California 9371 1
Telephone: (559) 206-2410
Facsimile: (559) 570-0126
OWNQUI-FUJNH
Attorneys for Defendant, State Center
Community College District
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY 0F FRESNO
ANITA REYES, Case No. 19CECG03 826
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S ERRATA To REPLY 1N
SUPPORT 0F DEFENDANT’S MOTION
v ,
FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE Date: May 4, 2021
DISTRICT, MADERA COMMUNITY Time: 3:30 PM-
COLLEGE CENTER and DOES 1-20, Dept: 403
Defendant Action Filed: October 21, 2019
Trial Date: July 19, 2021
Defendant files this Errata to its Reply Brief in support of its Motion for Summary
Adjudication.
NNNNNNNNN—Hflwflflflwfl—
The
OONmM->UJN—‘C©O°\IO\LII#WNHO
case of Brennan B. v. Superior Court is now on review by the California
Supreme Court, which court declined to depublish the decision of the Appellate Court on Appeal,
making the decision of the Appellate Court persuasive argument, but not controlling authority (B.
(Brennan) v. S.C., 480 P.3d 1199 (Cal.2021)) and the citation is updated to note the supreme court
appeal. The references to this citation as controlling are corrected to state that the decision is
currently persuasive under CRC 8.1 l15(e)(l), at page 2 lines 9-13; page 2 lines 20-28; page 4 line
3 and page 5 lines 13-19.
///
///
///
l
ERRATA TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MSJ
Dated: May 3_, 2021 DeMaria Law Firm, A.P.C.
BV:
/
L/W
Anthony N.
S.
DeMaria
Nicole Tucker
Attorneys for Defendant, STATE CENTER
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ERRATA TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MSJ
PROOF OF SERVICE
Ix)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO
At the time of service, Iwas over 18 years of age and not a party t0 this action. I am
employed in the County 0f Fresno, State of California. My business address is 1690 W. Shavs
Ave., Suite 220, Fresno, CA 9371 1.
On May 3, 2021, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as
DEFENDANT’S ERRATA TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT 0n the interested parties in this action as follows:
Eugenia L. Steele
The Torkzadeh Law Firm
18650 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
eugeniaéDtorklawxom
allegra@tork1aw.com
Claudia ,torklaw.com
XXX BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Based 0n a court order or an agreement of the
parties t0 accept electronic service, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons at the
electronic service addresses listed above. The electronic service address from which I served the
documents is tmaxwell@demarialawfirm.com.
XXX BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I enclosed the documents in an envelope 01
package provided by an overnight delivery carrier and addressed to the persons at the addressed
above. I placed the envelope or package for collection and overnight delivery at an office 0r a
regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws 0f the United States 0f America that the
foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this
Court at whose direction the service was made.
20 Executed on May 3, 2021, at Fresno, California.
21
F \
22
Teri Maxwell
23
24
25
Document Filed Date
May 03, 2021
Case Filing Date
January 01, 1900
Category
23 Unlimited - Other PI/PD/WD
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.