Letter,Correspondence: Pennrose Llc Vs Apc Associates Llc

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                BUR-L-001147-18        04/02/2019 11:13:09 AM        Pg 1 of1 Trans ID: LCV2019582466



                                                       LAW OFFICES

   JEFFREY I. BARON                           BARON & BRENNAN
 jbaron@baronbrennan.com                        A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION                            PHONE NO.
                                            STAFFORDSHIRE PROFESSIONAL CENTER                        (856) 627-6000
                                                     BUILDING F - SUITE 600
 JEFFREY M. BRENNAN                                 1307 WHITE HORSE ROAD                               FAX NO.
jbrennan@baronbrennan.com                        VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043                          (856) 627-4548




                                                     April 2, 2019

      Via eCourts and Regular Mail
      Hon. Ronald E. Bookbinder, A.J.S.C.
      Superior Court of New Jersey
      Burlington County Courts Facility
      49 Rancocas Road
      Mount Holly, New Jersey 08060

                Re:         In re Application of the Township of Moorestown
                            Docket No. BUR-L-1604-15

                            Pennrose, LLC vy. APC Associates, LLC, et al.
                            Docket No. BUR-L-1147-18

      Dear Judge Bookbinder:

             This firm represents defendant Russell Smith (“Smith”) in the matter pending under
      Docket No. BUR-L-1147-18. We are in receipt of Michael J. Edwards, Esquire’s March 28,
      2019 letter and proposed form of Order submitted under the Five-Day Rule. On behalf of Mr.
      Smith, we hereby object.

               Paragraph 1 of Mr. Edwards’ proposed form of Order provides for “an evaluation of
      potential alternative location(s) to the Pennrose site, for 100% affordable site(s).” In fact, Your
      Honor’s recent decision specifically cites and relies upon the language from the Settlement
      Agreement that requires Moorestown Township to “provide alternative compliance mechanisms
      that will provide the number of affordable rental units with the same bedroom and affordability
      restrictions planned for the Pennrose site.” It is respectfully submitted that Paragraph 1 should
      be revised to provide for an evaluation of the same.

                I will thank Your Honor in advance.

                                                           Respectful

                                                           BARO      VkB          AN, P.A.

                                                                  F Z—/Li “AN, ES
                                                                             BR
                                                       ;
                                                                        Le                   QUIRE


                Russell Smith (via email)