On January 09, 2002 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
Gomez, Aldo,
for CRIMINAL APPEAL
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
IPE
San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jan-09-2002 3:45 pm
Case Number: APP-01-005818
Filing Date: Jan-09-2002 11:40
Juke Box: 001 Image: 00340562
NTC. OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FILED.(O/B DUE 2/4/02.)
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. ALDO GOMEZ
001A00340562
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.CS ON DH RB WH
BP RP Ye HN NN KY HB Be ew we we Be De Ww LW
@oorravr FY NF SEH eH RHAAAREBH AS
FIL®&E
San Francisco County" “erigs
JAN 9 - anne
GORDON FARK i: Clork
By:
vas
Deputy Clerk”
Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
APPELLATE DIVISION
Appellate Action #CR 5818
LIMITED JURSIDICTION NO:1947129
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff/Respondent
NOTICE IN RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Vs.
ALDO GOMEZ,
Defendant/Appellant
THE RECORD ON APPEAL IN THE ABOVE LIMITED JURISDICTION COURT ACTION WAS
FILED IN THE APPELLATE DIVISION ON JANUARY 09, 2002.
In re Briefs in CIVIL and CRIMINAL cases.
THE APPELLANT SHALL FILE AN OPENING BRIEF WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF
THE RECORD ON APPEAL. THE RESPONDENT SHALL FILE A REPLY BRIEF WITHIN 20
DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF AND THE APPELLANT MAY
FILE A CLOSING BRIEF WITHIN 10 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF RESPONDENT’S REPLY
BRIEF, BUT NOT LATER THAN THE TIME OF HEARING. (Rule 105(a) of the California Rules
of Court.)
PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS WILL BE NOTIFIED BY MAIL BY THE CLERK OF THE
APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA RULE OF COURT, rule 137, APPLICATIONS TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEFS MUST SET FORTH FACTS SHOWING (1) GOOD CAUSE
FOR GRANTING THE APPLICATION, AND (2) ANY PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS GRANTEDSCS ONY DH FF Ww we
QBN PRPPpP PR RN WY eee DAD LL -
SUA YY FY NSF SSF eF UF BEETET SES
OR DENIED TO ANY PARTY AFTER FILING OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL. APPLICANTS
SHOULD ALSO SUBMIT A PROPOSED ORDER, TOGETHER WITH THE APPLICATION.
GORDON PARK- LI, Clerk
BY
Von
Mary K. Yap/Dep Glerk,
551-3675
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL (CODE CIV.PROC.& 1013a(4))
I, Mary Yap, a deputy clerk of the Superior Court for the County of San Francisco, certify that:
1) Iam not a party to this action:
2) On January 09, 2002 I served the attached:
NTC OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE
placing a copy thereof in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:
Allison Garbutt, (Inter-office.)
Asst. D.A.
850 Bryant Street, S.F. CA 94103
Stephen Rosen
Michele Forrar
Deputy Public Defenders
555-Seventh Street
San francisco, CA 94103
and
3)I, then placed the sealed envelope in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, First Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102, on the date indicated above for collection, attachment of required
prepaid postage, and mailing on that date following standard court pratices.
DATED: January 09, 2002 GORDON lea,
BY: Mary Yap Depu Lp
Preview
IPE San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jan-09-2002 3:45 pm Case Number: APP-01-005818 Filing Date: Jan-09-2002 11:40 Juke Box: 001 Image: 00340562 NTC. OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FILED.(O/B DUE 2/4/02.) PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. ALDO GOMEZ 001A00340562 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.CS ON DH RB WH BP RP Ye HN NN KY HB Be ew we we Be De Ww LW @oorravr FY NF SEH eH RHAAAREBH AS FIL®&E San Francisco County" “erigs JAN 9 - anne GORDON FARK i: Clork By: vas Deputy Clerk” Court SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO APPELLATE DIVISION Appellate Action #CR 5818 LIMITED JURSIDICTION NO:1947129 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff/Respondent NOTICE IN RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE Vs. ALDO GOMEZ, Defendant/Appellant THE RECORD ON APPEAL IN THE ABOVE LIMITED JURISDICTION COURT ACTION WAS FILED IN THE APPELLATE DIVISION ON JANUARY 09, 2002. In re Briefs in CIVIL and CRIMINAL cases. THE APPELLANT SHALL FILE AN OPENING BRIEF WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE RECORD ON APPEAL. THE RESPONDENT SHALL FILE A REPLY BRIEF WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF AND THE APPELLANT MAY FILE A CLOSING BRIEF WITHIN 10 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF RESPONDENT’S REPLY BRIEF, BUT NOT LATER THAN THE TIME OF HEARING. (Rule 105(a) of the California Rules of Court.) PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS WILL BE NOTIFIED BY MAIL BY THE CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING. IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA RULE OF COURT, rule 137, APPLICATIONS TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEFS MUST SET FORTH FACTS SHOWING (1) GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING THE APPLICATION, AND (2) ANY PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS GRANTEDSCS ONY DH FF Ww we QBN PRPPpP PR RN WY eee DAD LL - SUA YY FY NSF SSF eF UF BEETET SES OR DENIED TO ANY PARTY AFTER FILING OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL. APPLICANTS SHOULD ALSO SUBMIT A PROPOSED ORDER, TOGETHER WITH THE APPLICATION. GORDON PARK- LI, Clerk BY Von Mary K. Yap/Dep Glerk, 551-3675 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL (CODE CIV.PROC.& 1013a(4)) I, Mary Yap, a deputy clerk of the Superior Court for the County of San Francisco, certify that: 1) Iam not a party to this action: 2) On January 09, 2002 I served the attached: NTC OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE placing a copy thereof in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows: Allison Garbutt, (Inter-office.) Asst. D.A. 850 Bryant Street, S.F. CA 94103 Stephen Rosen Michele Forrar Deputy Public Defenders 555-Seventh Street San francisco, CA 94103 and 3)I, then placed the sealed envelope in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, First Floor San Francisco, CA 94102, on the date indicated above for collection, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing on that date following standard court pratices. DATED: January 09, 2002 GORDON lea, BY: Mary Yap Depu Lp