On May 31, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Peterson, Robert,
and
Dcs Consulting Inc,
Dsc All American Llc,
General Pump Company Llc,
Interpump Group Spa,
Nexoil Llc,
Oilnex Supply Llc,
for PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 2018-36443
ROBERT PETERSON IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
VS.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
INTERPUMP GROUP SPA, GENERAL
PUMP COMPANY, LLC, OILNEX, LLC,
NEXOIL, LLC, AND DCS
CONSULTING, INC. JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
DEFENDANT, DCS ALL AMERICAN, LLC’SRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EQUALIZE PEREMPTORY STRIKES
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
Defendant, DCS All American, LLC, (“DCS”) files this Response in Opposition to
Plaintiff’s Motion to Equalize Peremptory Strikes and in support would show the court as follows:
I. ARGUMENT
This is a case in which all parties are adamantly opposed, with conflicting claims against
one other. Plaintiff and DCS are opposed as to whether the two consultant workers on site were
independent contractors or employees, or whether they can legally be agents of DCS. Contrarily,
Plaintiff s claims against General Pump Company, (“General Pump”) are based on product
liability. In turn, while Plaintiff s expert testified Teflon tape was found on some of the bolts, but
not the bolt at issue as it was discarded, did not contribute to the accident, Plaintiff has since joined
with the arguments of General Pump’s experts which contend the Teflon tape was the primary
cause of the accident in an effort to hold DCS primarily responsible for the actions of the
consultants. In turn, DCS is adverse to General Pump by contending the power washer
manufactured by General Pump did not contain an warnings that Teflon tape should not be
utilized on the bolts at issue. In other words, as to causation, both Plaintiff and General Pump have
teamed up against DCS, so there is a strong argument that DCS should have an equal number of
strikes as Plaintiff. Consequently, all parties should be given an equal number of strikes, as all
parties are opposed to one other.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Equalize Peremptory Strikes should be denied because Defendants
General Pump and DCS are antagonistic with respect to liability and damages in this case.
Accordingly, General Pump and DCS should each be permitted six peremptory strikes and
Plaintiff’s Motion to Equalize Peremptory Strikes should be DENIED
. PRAYER
Because General Pump and DCS are antagonistic with respect to one another, they should
each be allowed six peremptory strikes, and Plaintiff’s Motion to Equalize Peremptory Strikes
should be DENIED
Respectfully submitted,
BUSH & RAMIREZ, PLLC
//s// John K. (Ken) Woodard
John K. (Ken) Woodard; TBN: 00791955
5615 Kirby Drive, Suite 900
Houston, Texas 77005
Telephone: (713) 626 1555
Facsimile: (713) 622 8077
Email: kwoodard.atty@bushramirez.com
TTORNEY FOR EFENDANT EXAS
NDUSTRIAL OX AINTENANCE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served on all counsel of record in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the EXAS ULES OF IVIL ROCEDURE on this the
day of March
Jason A. Itkin / Cory D. Itkin
Ryan Macleod / Jacob Karam
Arnold & Itkin, LLP
6009 Memorial Drive
Houston, Texas 77007
Clyde O. “Chip” Adams, IV
James A. “Jim” Lowery, III
Dixon J. Cheung
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4100 West
Dallas, Texas 75201
//s// John K. (Ken) Woodard
John K. (Ken) Woodard
Document Filed Date
March 22, 2021
Case Filing Date
May 31, 2018
Category
PERSONAL INJ (NON-AUTO)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.