arrow left
arrow right
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
						
                                

Preview

Wd COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS IDLESEX, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT mip * DOCKETNO: 1681CV00282 LOWELL FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK Plaintiff VS YENOH CORPORATION AND FRANK M. POLAK Defendants vs A-TUCARD SELF STORAGE LLC AND TUCARD LLC Reach-And-Apply Defendants bee AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE AND NO OPPOSITION I, John J. Hartigan, Esq., being duly sworn hereby say and depose as follows: 1. Tam an attomey licensed to Practice law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Tepresent the Reach-and-Apply Defendants, Tucard LLC and A-Tucard Self Storage LLC in the above-entitled matter. 2. [served the Reach-and-Apply Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Verified Complaint, a Supporting Memorandum and Affidavit upon the parties through counsel of record via my correspondence dated October 16, 201 8, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 3. Ihave received no Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss from the Plaintiff, Lowell Five Cents Saving Bank. 4. [have received no Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss from the Defendants, Yenoh Corporation, Frank M. Polak, and FMP Trustee of FMP Realty. 5. The time frame within which any Opposition was to be provided has expired,6. Ihave complied with the requirements of Superior Court Rule 9A.