arrow left
arrow right
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
  • The Lowell Five Cent Savings Bank vs. Yenoh Corporation et al Commercial Paper document preview
						
                                

Preview

jo.) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MIDDLESEX, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT DOCKET NO: 1681CV00282 LOWELL FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK VS VS Plaintiff Filed Aawovary 220) 9 Ass} Chere A-TUCARD SELF STORAGE LLC AND TUCARD LLC ) ) ) ) YENOH CORPORATION AND ) FRANK M. POLAK. ) Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Reach And Apply Defendants —) AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE AND NO OPPOSITION _ EE MUM ELIANCE AND NO OPPOSITION I, John J. Hartigan, Esq., being duly swom hereby say and depose as follows: - [am an attomey licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and represent the Reach and Apply Defendants, Tucard LLC and A-Tucard Self Storage LLC in the above-entitled matter, . I served the Reach and Apply Defendants’ Motion to Vacate Judgment and Request for Hearing upon the parties through counsel of record via my correspondence dated December 13, 2018, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. . Thave received no Opposition to the Motion to Vacate Judgment from the Plaintiff, Lowell Five Cents Saving Bank. - Ihave received no Opposition to the Motion to Vacate Judgment from the Defendants, Yenoh Corporation, Frank M. Polak, and FMP Trustee of FMP Realty. . The time frame within which any Opposition was to be provided has expired.ty 6. Ihave complied with the requirements of Superior Court Rule 9A. der the penalties of perjury. KE Bes ard ALC and A-Tucard Self Storage D)EXHIBIT 1LAW OFFICE OF JOHN J. HARTIGAN, P.C. COUNSELLOR ATLAW ~ 97 CENTRAL STREET, SUITE 204 LOWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 01852 . . Telephone: (978) 441-0054 Facsimile: (978) 441-0056 vevi@hart December 13, 2018 FIRST CLASS MAIL. Douglas E. Hausler, Esquire _ Lampert, Hausler & Rodman PC 10 North Road Chelmsford, MA 01824 FIRST CLASS MAIL ~ Maurice P. Mason, Jr. Esquire . ue 147 E. Merrimack Street Lowell, MA 01852-1208 RE: LOWELL FIVE CENT SAVING BANK vs. YENOH CORPORATION, ET AL.” DOCKET NO.: 1681CV00282 Gentlemen: In furtherance to our respective conversations whercin J related my recent discussions with the clerk of the L-2 Session, I endlose and serve upon you pursuant to Superior Court Rule 9A the below listed documents: * Motion for Reach-And-Apply Defendants, Tucard LLC and A-Tucard Self Storage LLC, to Vacate Judgment dated October 26, 2018; and ° Request for Hearing Please return your Opposition, if any, within the time frame dictated by the applicable Rule so that I may include the same with my filings. Further be advised that I intend to include in this filing the “9A Package” dated November ce: ‘Client