arrow left
arrow right
  • MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                WANDA

San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Sep-16-2003 4:09 pm

Case Number: CGC-02-414536
Filing Date: Sep-16-2003 4:09
Juke Box: 001 Image: 00789484
ORDER

MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al

001000789484

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Dean A. Hanley, Esq. (State Bar No. 169507)
Philip A. Harley, Esq. (State Bar No. 147407))
Francine S. Curtis, Esq. (State Bar No. 104338)
PAUL, HANLEY & HARLEY LLP

1608 Fourth Street, Suite 300

Berkeley, California 94710

Telephone: (510) 559-9980

Facsimile: (510) 559-9970

San Francisco County iperior Court

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - COURT OF UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

MARY WILLIAMS, etc., et al., ) Case No. 41 4536
Plaintiffs, } PI D] ORDER GRANTING
) MOTION FOR PREFERENCE
vs.
} {CEP § 360)
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al., )
) Date: September 16, 2003
Defendants. ) Time: 10:00 a.m.
) Dept: 206, Hon. Donna J. Hitchens
) Complaint Filed: November 8, 2002
__ ) Trial Date: Not Set

Plaintiffs' Motion for Preference in trial setting came on regularly for hearing on
September 16, 2003, in Department 206 of the above-captioned Court, the Honorable Donna J.
Hitchens presiding, and counsel for plaintiffs and defendants appearing.

Having considered the papers filed and served herein and the arguments made by
counsel, good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Preference in trial setting is
GRANTED, pursuant to C.C.P. § 36 (b). The matter is set for trial on Ton ' 5,20 date),
at_/:L$ am (time), in Department Z of . Discovery will remain open until the case
is assigned to a courtroom to commence trial. Mandatory Settlement Conference is set

for Bec | 4, 0093 in Room 304, Honorable Richard A. Kramer presiding. Summary judgment

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PREFERENCE
‘SAClients Plaintiffs W(WIiams, Mary (Melvin Dec'd) 2499.MFP Ondersdoc26

27

motions may be heard 15 days before trial on 15 days’ notice, as provided in General Order No.
140 and per parties’ stipulation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Status and Setting Conference, currently scheduled

petteleag

for October 15, 2003 in this case, is a by vacate:
4p 8 bce

mo bowals hor kes Take frown Olt 17, 2

Dated: Sep . \w_, 2003 ber & berry

A < Cc
Monoragle pen J. Hitchens

Judge of the rior Court

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PREFERENCE
SAClicntaPtastff"WAWiliams, Mary (Melvin Decld) 24990 FP Ontet loc