Motion,Ex Parte: MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                OA

San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Dec-15-2003 7:54 am

Case Number: CGC-02-414536
Filing Date: Dec-12-2003 1:53
Juke Box: 001 Image: 00851497
*T FOR CONTINUANCE IN RESPONE TO DEFT M. SLAYEN & ASS

MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al

001000851497

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.. 12/09/2003 12:16 FAX 415 3912904 CKR LAW @oo2
‘o: COLGMBATTO KLIMENKO &  3SE San Francis CSID: P Hanley Harley 12/09/200
10:37, p 2 WS we L

ee ey OL

1 || Dean A. Hanley, Esq. (State Bar No. 169507) Qe
Philip A. Harley, Esy. (State Bar No. 147407) dL
2 || Carolin K. Shining, Jisq. (State Bar No. 201140)
PAUL, HANLEY & HARLEY LLP @ORDUN
1608 Fourth Stroct, Suite 300
4 || Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone; (510) 559-9980
5 || Facsimile: (510) 559-9970

6 || Attorneys for Plaintiff

7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
9 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO-COURT OF UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

MARY M WILLIAMS, individually and as) Case Np.: 14536
12 |} successor-in-interest to MELVIN } STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
WILLIAMS, deceascd; and MARY M. s AL ,
WILLIAMS, individually and as Guardian ad ) HEARING DATE ON DEFENDAN r
14 ||Litem of RAQUEL L. WILLIAMS and } ee A MON'S MOTION FOR
JUVON D. WILLIAMS, minors; KIMBERLY) sy) Y JUDG!

SUMMARY JUDGME
1s ||C. WILLIAMS; and MICHELLE DeLEON, as) AND O&DER ThercoF

legal heirs of MELVIN WILLIAMS, Date: December 17, 2003
16 || deceased, New Date: January 23, 2004
Time: 9:30 a.m.
7 Plaintiffs, Dept: 302, Hon. Ronald Quidachay
Complaint Filed: November 8, 2003
18 | vs. Trial Date: January 5, 2004

19 || A.W, CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

20 Defendants.
21 ~ ——

er ee

This stipulation is made by and between plaintiffs and defendant METALCLAD
INSULATION CORPORATION, by and through their respective atlomeys of record, Paul,
Hanley & Harley, LLP, 4nd Colombatto, Klimenko & Rosse.

RECITALS

27 The Stipulation is based on the following facts:

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT METALGLAD INSULATION CORPORATION'S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page |
‘eXOGHNE-IPEECOCALG~INTanplenvieg DIRRDAFEMEPLON-t DOC912904 CKR LAW Hoo3
& SE San Francis CcSID: F ‘1 Hanley Harley 12/09/200

NS

Counsel for the Parties have met and conferred regarding defendant’s Motion for
2 || Summary Judgment, currently set for December 17, 2003, Both parties have agreed to continue

the hearing of said Motion for Summary Judgment until after plaintiffs’ Motion to Continue the

‘ Trial Date is granted. Plaintiffs currently have set a Motion to Continue the Trial Date before the}
: Presiding Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court for December 11, 2003. Plaintiffs”

7 intention is to file this stipulation only after the pending Motion to Contirme the January 5, 2004
g || Tal Date is granted, To date, no opposition to said Motion to Continue the Trial Date has been

9 || filed by any party. H'the Motion to Continue the January 5, 2004 trial is not granted, Plaintiffs
10 |] agree to not appear ex parte to seek to have this stipulation filed or enforced.
Moy
Mt

M

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT METATGLAD INSULATION CORPORATION'S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 2
[EDNSTINE- NF EELOW ALS Templenutg2RYSRINEDINC | DOO.12/09/2003 12:16 FAK 415 391°904 CKR LAW oo4
‘a; COLOMBATTO KLIMENKO & SSE San Francis CSID: F 1 Hanley Harley 12/09/7200
30:37, pe Me wo
1 STIPULATION

v

The Parties have agreed to contime the hearing of Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment from December 17, 2003, to January 23, 2004 at 9:30 a.m., in Department 302 before

4
the Honorable Ronald E. Quidachay, on condition that the pending Moticn to Continue the
3
January 5, 2004 trial is granted on December 11, 2003. Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed and
6
1 served on January 16, 2004 and reply paper, if any, shall be filed and served pursuant to the time

lines set forth in C.C.P. § 437c(a) and stipulations entered pursuant te plaintiffs’ motion for
9 || preference and related orders thercto.

10 || DATED: December 4 , 2003 PAUL, HANLEY & HARLEY LLP

n
2 By: luk OD be

1 Carolin K. Shining
3 Attorney for Plaintiffs

14 || DATED: December Q_, 2003 COLOMBATTO, KLIMENKO & ROSSE

CORPORATION

19 ||
20 |r

21 ir

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT METALCLAD INSULATION CORFORATION’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 3
EIDOCUME PERL OCA EI tergtenelnp ORIYA AAEMIERN=1 BOT12/09/2003 12:17 FAX 415 3912904 CKR LAW Boos

¥i COLOMBATTO KLIMENKO & SSE San Francis cCSID: 7 1 Hanley Harley 12/09/200
LG 1 ps
1 ORDER

wv

The Stipulation of the parties is approved and accepted. For good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties have agreed to contime the hearing on the

Motion for Summar; Judgment to January 23, 2004 at 9:30 a.m., in Department 302 before the

5 :
Honorable Ronaid E. Quidachay. Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed and served on January 16,

6

7 2004 and reply shall be filed and served pursuant to the time lines set forth in C.C.P. § 437c(a)

and stipulations entered pursuant to plaintiffs’ motion for preference and related orders thereto.
9 || DATED: December (9, 2003
10

il
12 1 JAMES L. WARREN

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT . Page 4

‘xOrIIME-INPEELOCALS-INTecipemningY G28 OMEDIOC—1.DOCIPA

San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Dec-15-2003 7:54 am

Case Number: CGC-02-414536
Filing Date: Dec-12-2003 1:53
Juke Box: 001 Image: 00851497
'T FOR CONTINUANCE IN RESPONE TO DEFT M. SLAYEN & ASS

MARY M WILLIAMS et al VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al

001000851497

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.27

28

Dean-A. Hanley, Esq. (State Bar No. 169507) .

Philip A. Harley, Esq. (State Bar No. 147407) ft £

Carolin K. Shining, Esq. (State Bar No. 201140) ‘Se Connalonn AanntsQy
PAUL, HANLEY & HARLEY LLP

1608 Fourth Street, Suite 300

Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone: (510) 559-9980
Facsimile: (510) 559-9970

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATH/OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO-COURT Of UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

‘Case No.: 414536

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT

DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AXYD ORDER THERE

MARY M WILLIAMS, individually and as
successor-in-interest to MELVIN
WILLIAMS, deceased; and MARY M.
WILLIAMS, individually and as Guardian a,
Litem of RAQUEL L. WILLIAMS and
JUVON D. WILLIAMS, minors; KIMBERLY

)

C. WILLIAMS; and MICHELLE DeLEON, as) Date: December 19, 2003
legal heirs of MELVIN WILLIAMS, New Date: January 21, 2004
deceased, Time: 9:30 a.m.
Dept.: 302, Hon. Ronald Quidachay
Plaintiffs, Complaint Filed: January 23, 2003
Trial Date: January 5, 2004

vs.
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

SSS ESS

This stipulation is made by and between plaintiffs and defendant DURAMETALLIC
CORPORATION, by and through their respective attorneys of record, Paul, Hanley & Harley,
LLP, and Jackson & Wallace, LLP.

RECITALS

The Stipulation is based on the following facts:

‘STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 1
‘\Ctieats\ Pints "Wills, Mary (Melvin Dec'd) 249SXDURAMETALLIC Stip Onder to cont MSI bg doe26

27

Counsel for the Parties have met and conferred regarding defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, currently set for December 19, 2003. Both parties have agreed to continue
the hearing of said Motion for Summary Judgment until after plaintiffs’ Motion to Continue the
Trial Date is granted. Plaintiffs currently have set a Motion to Continue the Trial Date before the
Presiding Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court for December 11, 2003. Plaintiffs’
intention is to file this stipulation only after the pending Motion to Continue the January 5, 2004
Trial Date is granted. To date, no opposition to said Motion to Continue the Trial Date has been
filed by any party. If the Motion to Continue the January 5, 2004 trial is not granted, Plaintiffs
agree to not appear ex parte to seek to have this stipulation filed or enforced.

If
Hl
Mit

‘STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 2
‘S\ClensPlantisiAWWiiams, Mary (Metvia Dec') 2498NDURAMETALLIC Sup Order to cont MSS rg doe12/41/2003 09:01 FAX 415 982 R700 JACKSON & WALLACE Booz

“ACKSON & WALLACE LLP (Sa.. Francisco) S CSID: PaulWanley Harley 12 09/2003
25, Pp
1 STIPULATION
2 The Parties have agreed to continue the hearing of Defendant’s Motion for Summary
3

Judgment from December 19, 2003, to January 21, 2004 at 9:30 a.m., in Department 302 bufore

4
the Honorable Ronald E. Quidachay, on condition that the pending Motion to Continue the
$
January 5, 2004 trial is granted on December 11, 2003. Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed and
6
7 served on January 13, 2004 and reply paper, if any, shall be filed and served pursuant to the time

fines set forth in C.C.P. § 437c(a) and stipulations entered pursuant to plaintiffs’ motion for

9 || preference and related orders thereto.

10 || DATED: December // , 2003 PAUL, HANLEY & HARLEY LLP
i
12 Wy
Carofin K. Shining
3 Attorney for Plaintiffs
14 || DATED: December {0 , 2003 JACKSON & WALLACE
1s

16 By:

Manoli

Cdvnsel for Defendant
DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION

Mtl

Mi

Ul

27

28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION'S MOTION FCR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pege 3
EOCUMEWI\FEELOCALS-NTemplennunphD22b He ODUFEDD-| DOS- ORDER

The Stipulation of the parties is approved and accepted. For good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties have agreed to continue the hearing on the
Motion for Summary Judgment to January 21, 2004 at 9:30 a.m., in Department 302 before the
Honorable Ronald E. Quidachay. Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed and served on January 13,
2004 and reply shall be filed and served pursuant to the time lines set forth in C.C.P. § 437c(a)
and stipulations entered pursuant to plaintiffs’ motion for preference and related orders thereto.

DATED: December / Z,2003

onald E, Quidachay
superior Court Judge
JAMES L. WARREN

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT Page 4
S:\Clients\Plaintiffs\W\Willinms, Mary (Melvin Dec'd) 249ADURAMETALLIC Stip Order to cont MS3 hrg-doc