arrow left
arrow right
  • DOUGLAS KIRK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DOUGLAS KIRK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DOUGLAS KIRK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DOUGLAS KIRK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DOUGLAS KIRK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DOUGLAS KIRK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DOUGLAS KIRK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DOUGLAS KIRK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

oO ND HF Ww YD RN NN NR RN RD Re et oD KF A RB YB YN H S oD we UY DH WH BF YW NY = David T. Biderman, Bar No. 101577 DBiderman@perkinscoie.com Eric D. Sentlinger, Bar No. 215380 ESentlinger@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: 415.344.7000 Facsimile: 415.344.7288 Attorneys for Defendants HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., fik/a AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco AUG 21 2013 Clerk of the Court BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DOUGLAS KIRK, Plaintiff, v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BéP), et al., Defendants. Ml Mi Mi Mt Mt uM “it Mt Case No. CGC-02-410512 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., F/K/A ALLIEDSIGNAL INC., SUCCESSOR- IN-INTEREST TO THE BENDIX CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER. 39812-0003.05 1 S/LEGAL27638703.1oo em RN DR HW BF BY = TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 20, 2013 the Honorable Judge Teri L. Jackson entered an Order granting defendant Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation’s (“Honeywell”) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute Claim. A copy is attached hereto as Exhibit A. DATED: August 21, 2013 PERKINS COIE LLP By: /S/ Eric D, Sentlinger Eric D. Sentlinger Attorneys for Defendant HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., fik/a AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER 39812-0003.05 1 5/LEGAL27638703.%oe NDA WH RB WwW NY yo woN Dee BRRREORARERE SRE na TES HR ES EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER. 39812-0003,05 1 S/LEGAL27638703.1oO em NR A HH RB YN David T. Biderman, Bar No. 101577 dbiderman@perkinscoie.com - Bret. Seatinger, Bar No, 215380 inp, BND OR G5 esentlinger@perkinscoie.com "antisodel & D PERKINS COIE Lip OW Babin, 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 Aug 2, ours San Francisco, CA 94111 . 0 2013 Telephone: 415.344.7000 Facsimile: 415.344.7288 an OF Te nr Attorneys for Defendant 4 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., fik/a AlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DOUGLAS KIRK, Case 1g Pon Plaintiff, I SED] ORDER GRANTING HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., v. F/K/A ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO THE ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B¢P), BENDIX CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. CLAIM AUG 2,0 DB Time: 9:30 am. Dept. 503 The Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (“Motion”), filed in this matter by defendant HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., fia AlliedSignal Inc., as Successor-in- Interest to The Bendix Corporation (‘HONEY WELL"), came on for hearing on #une27,-2043, before this Court. AUG 2.0 208 Having considered the Motion, and all relevant evidence, and noting that plaintiff Douglas Kirk (“Plaintiff”) failed to oppose this Motion, HONEYWELL demonstrated that Plaintiff failed to bring this action to trial within five years after the action commenced against Honeywell pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 583.310 and 583.360. ABROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING 39812-0003.051S/.BGAL26308426.1 HONEYWELL’S OF MOTION TO DISMISSCo mo WM KD A ee HN Based upon the foregoing reasons and good cause appearing therefor: ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that Honeywell’s Motion is GRANTED and this matter is . dismissed with prejudice as to HONEYWELL. ITIS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/ LO NA Mild Hon! Teri L. Jackson JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 39812-0003.08 1 S/LEGAL26302426.1 RDER GRANTING 2 HONEYWELL'S OF MOTION TO DISMISSOo we RD HW B® WY NN BND DD RRR tee eh ket eon A A fF BN |= SF OD we ADA Hh BF YW NY K oS PROOF OF SERVICE I, Susan Youngquist, am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is Perkins Coie LLP, Four Embarcadero, Suite 2400, San Francisco, CA 94111. On August 21, 2013, I caused to be served the following document(s): NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., F/K/A ALLIEDSIGNAL INC., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO THE BENDIX CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE on all interested parties in this action: BY ELECTRONIC MAIL; I provided the document(s) listed above to the File & {| ServeXpress website pursuant to their instructions on that website. If the document(s) is/are provided electronically by 5:00 p.m., then the document will be deemed served on the date that it was provided to File & ServeXpress. PLAINTIFF Douglas Kirk 1140 Formby Way Roseville, CA 95757 BY U.S. MAIL: I placed the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with ix postage thereon fully prepaid, the United States mail at San Francisco, California addressed as set forth below. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed in San Francisco, hip Di) California. DATED: August 21, 2013 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER 39812-6003.05 15/LEGAL27638703.t