arrow left
arrow right
  • Kielson, David et al vs. Cooley Dickinson Hospital et al Malpractice - Medical document preview
  • Kielson, David et al vs. Cooley Dickinson Hospital et al Malpractice - Medical document preview
  • Kielson, David et al vs. Cooley Dickinson Hospital et al Malpractice - Medical document preview
  • Kielson, David et al vs. Cooley Dickinson Hospital et al Malpractice - Medical document preview
  • Kielson, David et al vs. Cooley Dickinson Hospital et al Malpractice - Medical document preview
  • Kielson, David et al vs. Cooley Dickinson Hospital et al Malpractice - Medical document preview
  • Kielson, David et al vs. Cooley Dickinson Hospital et al Malpractice - Medical document preview
  • Kielson, David et al vs. Cooley Dickinson Hospital et al Malpractice - Medical document preview
						
                                

Preview

C7 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Hampshire, ss. Superior Court Department of the Trial Court : Civil Action No.: 15-00130 DAVID KIELSON, et al., Plaintiffs PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM OF DEFENDANT, BRIAN D. JOHNSON, M.D. Vv. BRIAN D. JOHNSON, M.D., et al., Defendants eed I, INFORMED CONSENT 1. Did Dr. Johnson on October 16, 2013, have a duty to disclose all of the material risks to Mr. Kielson regarding his anesthesia course of treatment on October 31, 2013? Yes No If your answer to Question 1 is “NO,” go no further. If your answer to Question 1 is “YES,” please continue with Question 2. 2. Was there a failure to disclose a material risk to Mr. Kielson concerning his anesthesia course of treatment? YES NO If your answer to Question 2 is “NO,” go no further. If your answer to Question 2 is “YES,” please continue with Question 3. 3. If there was a failure to disclose a material risk to Mr. Kielson concerning his anesthesia course of treatment, did the plaintiffs establish that the undisclosed risk actually occurred as a result of the anesthesia? YES NO If your answer to Question 3 is “NO,” go no further. If your answer to Question 3 is “YES,” please continue with Question 4.4. If there was a failure to disclose a material risk to Mr. Kielson concerning his anesthesia course of treatment, have the plaintiffs established that Mr. Kielson would not have consented to the course of treatment had he known of the material risk? YES NO. If your answer to Question 4 is “NO,” go no further. If your answer to Question 4 is “YES,” please continue with Question 5. 5. If there was a failure to disclose a material risk to Mr. Kielson concerning his anesthesia course of treatment, has the plaintiff established that a reasonable person in similar circumstances would not have consented to the course of treatment had he/she known of the material risk? YES NO. If your answer to Question 5 is “NO,” go no further. If your answer to Question 5 is “YES,” please continue with Question 6. 6. Was the failure to disclose a material risk to Mr. Kielson concerning his anesthesia course of treatment a substantial contributing cause of the alleged injuries to Mr. Kielson? YES NO If your answer to Question 6 is “NO,” go no further. If your answer to Question 6 is “YES,” continue to question 7.IL DAMAGES 7. Did Mr. Kielson suffer substantial or permanent loss or impairment of a bodily function or substantial disfigurement? YES NO 8. If the answer to Question 6 is “Yes”, what is the amount of money that will fairly and reasonably compensate Mr. Kielson for the physical and mental pain and suffering, impairment, disfigurement and/or loss of enjoyment of life that he suffered as a result of the lack of informed consent? (if your answer to Question 7 is “NO”, the amount of damages awarded in Question 8 for pain and suffering, both prior to the verdict and in the future, may not exceed $500,000.00.) Prior to the verdict: dollars and cents. (write out in words) (s ). (write out in numbers) In the future: dollars and cents. (write out in words) ($. ). (write out in numbers) If you award future damages in response to this question, please set forth the period of weeks, months or years over which such future damages are intended to provide compensation. (Answer in weeks, months or years)Ill. LOSS OF CONSORTIUM 9. If your answer to Question 6 is “YES,” did Gail Kielson (“Mrs. Kielson”) lose any society, companionship, love and support of her husband, Mr. Kielson? YES NO If your answer to Question 9 is “NO,” go no further. If your answer to Question 9 is “YES,” continue to question 10. 10. Did the failure to give informed consent to Mr. Kielson cause Mrs. Kielson to lose any society, companionship, love and support of Mr. Kielson? YES NO If your answer to Question 10 is “NO,” go no further. If your answer to Question 10 is “YES,” continue to question 11. 11. If your answers to both Questions 9 and 10 are “YES,” what amount of money would fairly and reasonably compensate Mrs. Kielson for her loss of society, companionship, love and support of Mr. Kielson? dollars cents (write out in words) ($. ). (write out in numbers) Thereby certify that at least 12 out of 14 members of the jury have agreed on each question. Date ForepersonDated: November 28, 2017 The Defendant BRIAN D. JOHNSON, M.D. By His Attorneys: Michael -Burke — BBO No. 065400 Christopher J. Visser - BBO No. 676531 Bulkley, Richardson and Gelinas, LLP 1500 Main Street - Suite 2700 P.O. Box 15507 Springfield, MA 01115 (413) 781-2820; (413) 272-6803 Fax mburke@bulkley.com evisser@bulkley.com Certificate of Service I, Christopher J. Visser, attorney for the defendant, Brian D. Johnson, M.D., do hereby certify that a true copy of the above document was served upon the attorney of record for each party by electronic mail and first class mail on November 28, 2017. Cm Christophiér J. Visser