arrow left
arrow right
  • Bielski, Jerzy R, vs. Crocker, James B et al Motor Vehicle Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Bielski, Jerzy R, vs. Crocker, James B et al Motor Vehicle Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Bielski, Jerzy R, vs. Crocker, James B et al Motor Vehicle Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Bielski, Jerzy R, vs. Crocker, James B et al Motor Vehicle Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Bielski, Jerzy R, vs. Crocker, James B et al Motor Vehicle Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Bielski, Jerzy R, vs. Crocker, James B et al Motor Vehicle Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Bielski, Jerzy R, vs. Crocker, James B et al Motor Vehicle Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
  • Bielski, Jerzy R, vs. Crocker, James B et al Motor Vehicle Negligence - Personal Injury / Property Damage document preview
						
                                

Preview

46 010 1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS HAMPSHIRE, SS. HAMPSHIRE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT C.A. NO. 1680CV00010 JERZY R. BIELSKI, Plaintiff Vv. nil (OR COURT JAMES B. CROCKER, Defendant ae 206 Vv. Hi td R. JAMES J. RUTTER, Third Party Defendant THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY LAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Now comes, the Third-Party Defendant and makes this his Answer to the Defendant/Third- Party Plaintiffs Complaint. 1 The third-party defendant neither admits nor denies the allegations as he is without information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. The third-party defendant neither admits nor denies the allegations as he is without information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. The third-party defendant neither admits nor denies the allegations as he is without information or knowledge sufficient to form a beliefs to their truth. No response is required because this paragraph calls for a legal conclusion. To the extent a response is requited, denied. The third-party defendant denies. The third-party defendant denies The third-party defendant denies. The third-party defendant states that the allegations contained in this paragraph state no claim against him and, therefore, no answet is required. To the extent any part of the allegations applies to third-party defendant, the third-party defendant denies. WHEREFORE, the third-party defendant, denies that the defendant/ third-party plaintiff is entitled to judgment of any kind. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FIRST DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that defendant/third-party plaintiffs alleged injuries and damage were caused in whole or in part by the defendant/ third-party plaintiffs own negligence, which was greater than any negligence of the third-party defendant. SECOND DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that at the time of the alleged accident defendant/ third-party plaintiff was guilty of a violation of the law that contributed to the accident. THIRD DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that the defendant/ third-party plaintiffs alleged injuries and damage were caused by a person or persons for whose conduct the third-party defendant is not responsible. FOURTH DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that defendant/ third-party plaintiff is not entitled to recover damages for pain and suffering under General Laws, Chapter 231, §6D. FIFTH DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that he is exempt from tort liability to the defendant/third- party plaintiff under General Laws, Chapter 90, §34M. SIXTH DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that this action was not commenced within the time required by the laws providing therefor. SEVENTH DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that defendant/ third-party plaintiff's suit is subject to dismissal because of insufficiency of service of process pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P 12(b)(5) and/or insufficiency of process pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P 12(b)(4). EIGHTH DEFENSE ‘The third-party defendant says that service of process upon him has been insufficient and that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over him. NINTH DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that defendant/ third-party plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. TENTH DEFENSE ‘The third-party defendant says that the defendant/third-party plaintiffs suit is subject to dismissal because of improper venue pursuant to Mass. R.. Civ. P 12(6)(3). ELEVENTH DEFENSE The third-party defendant says the action must be dismissed for want of jurisdictional amount. TWELFTH DEFENSE The third-party defendant says that the defendant/third-party plaintiff fails to mitigate his damages. THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT DEMANDS TRIAL BY JURY ON ALL ISSUES OF FACT. Respectfully submitted, James J. Rutter, By his attorney, Ol Ad Darlene E. Thebau¥squire Law Offices of Sherry, Black, Geller, Cain & Vachereau 10 St. James Avenue, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02116 Tel #: 617-867-4731 BBO # 661929 D arlene, Thebaud@LibertyMutual.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Darlene E. Thebaud, Attorney for the third-party defendant, hereby certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing T 'HIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAT TFF’S COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR LY TRIAL by mailing a copy of same postage prepaid, directed to: MichaelJ. Mascis, Esquire Law Offices Of Jacqueline Allen 53 State Street Boston, MA 02109 John J. Stobietski, Esquire Stobierski & Connor 377 Main Street QIn Greenfield, MA 01301 Dated: anal | L Datlene E. Thebaud, ‘Néquire