Answer: Going, Connie vs. Ronald G D'Auteuil Doing Business as Olde Tyme Stuff,Inc. et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                ek aN

46 044

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

WORCESTER, SS: TRIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS
SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
WORCESTER DIVISION
DOCKET # 1680CV 00011

CONNIE GOING,
PLAINTIFF

DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER,
vs. DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS

  

 
   
    
 

ro

   

RONALD G. D’AUTEUIL,

D/B/A OLDE TYME STUFPE AND | B22 206 |
OLDE TYME STUFFE, INC. : :
DEFENDANTS “I,
Now comes the Ronald G. D’Auteuil, (“Individual Defendant”)

D/B/A Olde Tyme Stuffe and Olde Tyme Stuffe, Inc. (“Business
Defendants”) and ANSWER as follows:
PARTIES

1. All the Defendants are without sufficient information to
Admit or Deny this paragraph.

2. Denied as to ..”Does business as Olde Tyme Stuffe”. The
reminder of the Paragraph is Admitted.
3. Admitted
FACTS
4, Denied as to Individual Defendant..”conducts business in

the Commonwealth of Massachusetts”, and Admitted
as to the Business Defendants.10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

. Admitted as to Individual Defendant being “in the

business of auctioning” Denied as to the remainder of
the paragraph.
Denied as to the Business Defendants being “in the
business of auctioning” and Admitted as to the Business
Defendants as to the remainder of the paragraph.
Admitted

Admitted

Admitted

Admitted

Admitted

Admitted

Denied

Denied

Admitted

15. Denied

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

Denied

Denied

Denied

Denied

Denied

Denied22. Admitted as to..”answered on April 6, 2015” all the
Defendants Deny the remainder of the paragraph.

[23].

24. All the Defendants are without sufficient information
to Admit or Deny this paragraph.

25. Exhibit “D” speaks for itself and no further response
is required.
26. All the Defendants are without sufficient information

to Admit or Deny this paragraph.

27. All the Defendants are without sufficient information
to Admit or Deny this paragraph.

28. Admitted

COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
29. No response is required.

30. Admitted

31. Denied

(31) Denied
32. Denied
Wherefore the Defendants ask this Honorable Court to:
a. Enter judgement against the Plaintiff and for the

Defendant;

b. Award no further/additional relief to the Plaintiff.COUNT II
PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL
33. No response is required.

34. Denied
35. Denied
36. Denied
Wherefore the Defendants ask this Honorable Court to:

a. Enter judgement against the Plaintiff and for the Defendant;

b. Award no further/additional relief to the Plaintiff.

COUNT III
QUANTUM MERUIT
37. No response is required.
38. Denied
39. Denied

40. Denied

Wherefore the Defendants ask this Honorable Court to:

a. Enter judgement against the Plaintiff and for the
Defendant;

b. Award no further/additional relief to the Plaintiff.Ne Se

COUNT IV
VIOLATION OF M.G.L. ch. 93A

41. No response is required.

42. Denied
43. Denied
44. Denied

Wherefore the Defendants ask this Honorable Court to:
a. Enter judgement against the Plaintiff and for the
Defendant;
b. Award no damages to the Plaintiff;

c. Award no further/additional relief to the Plaintiff.

COUNT V
FRAUD/DECEIT

45. No response is required.

46. Denied
47. Denied
48, Denied

Wherefore the Defendants ask this Honorable Court to:
a. Enter judgement against the Plaintiff and for the
Defendant;

b. Award no further/additional relief to the Plaintiff.COUNT VI
CONVERSION

49. No response is required.

50. Denied
51. Denied
52. Denied

WHEREFORE, the Defendants ask this Honorable Court to

a. Enter judgement against the Plaintiff and for the
Defendant;

b. Award no further/additional relief to the Plaintiff

The Defendants’ DEMAND A TRIAL BY JURY ON ALL COUNTS SO
TRIABLE.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

The Superior Court has a lack of jurisdiction over the
subject matter.

SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

The Plaintiff has brought this action in an improper
venue.

THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

There is/was insufficiency of Service of process.*seTqTIOSeT{TOO Zo/pue senbTjue se entTea JueoTITubts

Hutaey se pequeserderz wpteToOTequnoD uT Juepusyzeq aya YyoTYM

suoTSsTuMIOD 03 pesrbe ye Aqzedorzd Teuoszed jo sueqy utTeqreo

uotjone 4e [Tes pue eASsTIJeT 02 WTeTOTSequNOD UT jUepUETeq
eu UTM squewebuerze spew wtTeTOTe\quNOD UT JITIUTeETA 9UuL’

*sqqesnuoessey ‘Aqunop eatyusduey
‘uoqdureyzsem UT septTsezZ JeTTeq pue uoTJewAoOJuT uodn oym
Tenptatput ue st /,WTeTOTe\uNoD uT juepuesed, ‘Hutog etuuoy *

*sqqesnyoessen
4zeqyseorom ‘jeeT4g YTOFINS ps ye J/u sseutsng
Fo soetd etdtoutad e yATmM uoTIerodz0o sj jesnyoesseH

e st /,wtTeToreqUNOD UT FFTIUTETd, ‘OUI ‘eFgNIS WAL ePTO*

(S) NIVIOWALNAOD

-Ayzedozd Teuoszed Tey Jo enTea
auy HutTutwzejep ut soushTTTp enp esn of peTtey FITIUTETA SUL

SSNEAG0 AALLWWalasv LHSIT

‘etqeottTddeut ere LINYEW WALNYNO GNW TaddOLsSa
RYOSSINOUd JO seutTTJOOp sey s4stxe JOeTIUOD pPTTeA e esneoseg

SSNa4aq AAILWWALaAIY HINSASS

‘[Tvey 07 JUepuezeq
28uq UTM JOeTJUCD By pesned (s)YyOReTq UMO S,JJTIUTETA SUL

SSNadGq SAILWWAIAAW HLA

*pequerH eq ued jetjTer
yotum uodn supeTo/ute{To e eqeqs 03 STTey LNIVIdWOD euL

SSNSAad AALLVWALAAW LSdId HLAYNOTCOUNT I-MISREPRESENTATION

4, The Plaintiff in Counterclaim realleged paragraphs 1-3 and
incorporated the same herein.

5. The Plaintiff in Counterclaim relying on these
representations invested time and money to retrieve and
then sell at auction items of the Defendant in Counterclaim
that did not have significant value as antiques and/or
collectibles.

I. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, The Plaintiff in Counterclaim demands and prays
that this Honorable Court will:

(a) Enter judgment for the Plaintiff in Counterclaim and
against the Defendant in Counterclaim;

(b) Enter any other relief deemed just and appropriate.

COUNT II-FRIVILOUS LITIGATION

6. The Plaintiff in Counterclaim realleged paragraphs 1-5 and
incorporated the same herein.

7. The Defendant in Counterclaim has presented its allegations
against the Plaintiff in Counterclaim to the District
Attorney’s Office for Hampden County, the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts Division of Standards and neither of which
found evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegations in
this COMPLAINT of the Defendant in Counterclaim.

8. The Defendant in Counterclaim and/or her counsel with prior
knowledge of same has initiated this litigation.

II. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, The Plaintiff in Counterclaim demands and prays
that this Honorable Court will:(c)

 

Enter judgment for the Plaintiff in Counterclaim and
against the Defendant in Counterclaim for the costs and
legal fees of Plaintiff in Counterclaim to defend this
action;

Enter any other relief deemed just and appropriate.

Plaintiffs
B .

     
    

   

“Morris A. Bergmarr—~Es

BBO #553035

39 Highland Street

Worcester, MA 01609
(508) 981-5934 Ph.
(508) 753-9804 Fax

Email:moebergmani963@yahoo.comCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Morris A. Bergman, Esquire, hereby certify that on this
the 18th day of February 2016 I caused to be served:

DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER, DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS

Upon the Following:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Justin P. Goldberg, Esquire

150 Pleasant Street -Suite #208
Easthampton, MA 01027

— —

BBO #553035
39 Highland Street
Worcester, MA 01609