arrow left
arrow right
  • Stephen Sloan vs. Panoche Water District06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • Stephen Sloan vs. Panoche Water District06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • Stephen Sloan vs. Panoche Water District06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • Stephen Sloan vs. Panoche Water District06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • Stephen Sloan vs. Panoche Water District06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • Stephen Sloan vs. Panoche Water District06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • Stephen Sloan vs. Panoche Water District06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • Stephen Sloan vs. Panoche Water District06 Unlimited - Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
						
                                

Preview

George P. Rodarakis, SBN 222214 Kathryn L. Greene, SBN 294727 RODARAKIS & SOUSA, APC 100 Sycamore Avenue, Suite 101 Modesto, CA 95354 Telephone: (209) 554-5232 Facsimile: (209) 544-1085 OOOQQMAWNn—a Marshall C. Whitney, SBN 82952 Whitney, Thompson & Jeffcoach LLP E-FILED 8050 N. Palm Avenue, Suite l 10 Fresno, CA 93711 8/14/2020 3:26 PM Telephone: (559) 753-2550 Superior Court of California Facsimile: (559) 753-2560 County of Fresno By: K. Daves, Deputy Attorneys for Plaintiff Stephen W. Sloan SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F FRESNO STEPHEN W. SLOAN, an individual, Case No. 18CECGOOS 11 Plaintiff, NOTICE 0F ENTRY 0F ORDER vs. CONTINUING HEARING 0N PANOCHE WATER DISTRICT’S MOTION FOR PANOCHE WATER DISTRICT, a California SUMMARY JUDGMENT water district; and DOES 1-100 inclusive, Defendants. NNNNNNNNNt—‘t—t—AH—an—nr—An—n—H WNaM§MNHO©WNQLthNHO TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREm: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Court entered its Order Continuing Hearing on Panache Water District’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Auglst 13, 2020. A true copy of said order is attached hereto as Exhibit A. DATED: August 14, 2020 RODARAKIS & SOUSA, APC 1 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PANOCHE WATER DISTRICT’S MOTION FOR SUWARY JUDGMENT u m N u u m a N ; N w ._. 8 M B e 5 3 a 2 O °hflau¥upfl H « .m 3 < w m mH n n 0 : > a m2 n ao ma a a n mfl 5E 9 2 8z E n n n o c 0 1 . 8 g n 3 a m o g 3 n E u n 5 2 9 0 nm an E a — g “a z . n i mm gn m m g a : 0 n w$ . 6 E a 0 im z % o " n OH g 5 .. 0 3 . H? . w . o . " " . . 3 aw a > Eg O . m n€ fi n B A 5 3 ‘ B > B o GG 3 ng 3 ;9 . g g E g 2 d m m .a ” 2 3 u m 4 > E S 8 w > 8 .m m E 0 a afi r — te: o k .m .m m m 3 n 3 w vw $ n C m q m ; 3 m E { 9 k M S 5 ofl g mm M gE . w 2 o 5m m.u I \j o i U m . wu x I g E E 3 £ n m m g .z Em m h t .5 a w m s S E a 1 g » E n m bm b ow om m nzw E . u u 3 TH Sz 8 a ? g i ? “ m: a oo u : z m» ~z g a 3 5. 8E Eu mu m _ E 8 m : O E a ck8 c ? 2. 3 M hd a n o n w a. m z Oa 8 m a F .H E» :03E Zz 1 a a E g aa X 2 m m u n 0 e d > . a E 83 a E W 32 m a 0 0 8 « ? — § 06. 8 a m m x . ! O > 5 9 0 o n 3 & 8 O _ 0 » . 2 . m 6 g m _ 3 . & H = 2E B 5 9. 5 3 ao ? 2 O Hy o . 3 8 u o Om O n 3 a : E NH d 3 E 8 8 fi g : m 3 m O n . —U w o E a E — «m 9 H O n g $ i w 8 O. m I U fi 3 a 2 0 a D ufi . H fi 8 g m g ga § z . $I 4 g “3 5 < 5m m mWo f G a é s n H n fl “ w R I f n ” 3 H c m Mm E §a fi Q . .a a z x . o l > = m H m 5 g a g wB_ z m u 5 E a a 3 a n 0 O< N l Z gs 8 g E 2 o om E l ‘ Hg : m » S O A0 gé 3 F a g H. _. l fi t u g m gg .$ O ” ~ n mg .3 ? 5 C M lfi 8 E n ? 8 %N o Z m 9 m . 8 m . 3 a e ? fi . _. > fi 0 : m E 5 % b = < _ < g a 5 “o n B _ m s 2 5 i g a é a 02 w » “ c fixE 3 ; fi u n fi v : 8 u F Ha U § m a n n V > s w EG i E g fiN § a ” 5 “a a o N o 3 » » ” § m I o . c 53 m x.) WHEREAS, the parties wish to maxim the hearing'by approximately one week to accommodate the schedule of co-counsel for Plaintifi, WHEREAS, no trial data has been set in the instant litigation; 1T Is HEREBY SHPULATED, as folliwws: WWQGM§HNr< 1. The hearing on Panoche’s motion fiat summary judynem shall be continued to Septet‘nber 2,2020 at 3:30 p.m. Should September 2, 2&0 be unavailable on the Court's calendar, the hearing on Panoche’s motion for summaxy judgncnt shall be continued to the first available date thereafiar. 2. Panoche’s Reply shall be filed and served on or before August 24, 2020. IT ls so summary. Respectfully submitted, mm); 8 \ RODARAKIS & SOUSA, APC wau33335:3 'L. A for Plainfifi‘ smphm w. Sloan ...._.._. DATED: l‘ I ‘ . lmey Attorneys for Plaintiff Shaphen W. Sloan DATED: McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD. WAYTB & CARRUTH, LLP By: Ben Nic olson Amorneys for Defendant Panache Water District 2 S'I'II'ULA'I'ION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 0N MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT u m M u a u m N n n E u u B o 5 g 3 3 G E a 5 : 8 w a q a m u _ h n ‘ 9 3 r w a 5 g g 8 3 . a 2 . d n e 1 3 m 8 9 ? g ? N 5 » 3 ge H H 3 s . . . . . . A 0 s s . . a a .N mu 9 $ m g n 8 5 . o m o g n d E m fi y e g z _‘ ? » B l \ s a fi i u ; » w a § fiE x a ~ . 1 /) g o B w u n < g E fi o . n o fi o u n m u g m c a ? uu g q N o g v . g 0 gh . m n m 3 . 3 a m a mfl u . fi s Oo , ?u a m fi g $ s Zz r n u E E c 3 . w : n x — o g w 3> 2 c E t a 5 s o o . 8 5 w w . 3 E g E g m g 0 o a E n 9. a 2 n a o a u 5. n g m o g W 0 u n g e n g g E g M 3 I . u s. i fi n , !"w 0 . E" € w ” n g n m 8 n o R u . %§ s o 8 o .N E . —§ > 3 . $ 0 u 3 n m ” “ €8 m 2 m 3 N fi E O v 2 a—u 3 8 R > 3 2 3 Z 3 — g S B I 3 a0 5 . g 3 3 9 a o E g U 8 2 n 5 “5 r530 E u g c u ng §H :a8 fi0 m s : ! "5 3 w . n 5. 2. o Q . u. M m : Qfi $ 8 .a E a « a E5 M i 0 E $ o w 2 3 5 n o i 3 . . 8 5 5 . 6 : i .6 8 g — 2 — S n g ? a 3 . g i n . . . E = 5 ‘ u m N q u m u m N M N n — M H A m M e G a 3 G z m a s ONQGM#WM_ r _ _ i . __ j _ » f H H 4——— . P r a m A H m . 3 9 3 8 z m 3 ? 0 : 3. G O 2 “ . : H O N m o O C o m m D . m . \ o : m g d w E . 9 . m 9 m EE 5 wQ