What is a Motion for Summary Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Motion for Summary Judgment

Recent Rulings on Motion for Summary Judgment

1-25 of 10000 results

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

s Motion for Summary Adjudication 4)Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Turner Construction Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiffs 1. Motion by Saddleback Corp. dba Saddleback Waterproof for Summary Judgment or Adjudication as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Defendant Saddleback’s motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication of Issues 5 and 6 (statute of limitations) is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

“In granting or denying a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, the court need rule only on those objections to evidence that it deems material to its disposition of the motion. . .” (CCP § 437c(q).)

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ANTHONY SAM VS RENEE KWAN ET AL

On November 15, 2019, the Court denied First American Title Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication against Plaintiffs.

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

GREGORY WARD VS ISABEL M. COATS

or both; (3) [Opposing party's] evidence in opposition to [moving party's] motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication or both (if appropriate); and (4) [Opposing party's] request for judicial notice in opposition to [moving party's] motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication or both (if appropriate).

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

GARY MADDOCK ET AL VS CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO

.: BC659212 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Date: July 8, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

KRISTIN BAKER VS ANGELICA MARIE ROBINSON, ET AL.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: July 8, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

ASHLEY GONZALEZ VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

Nevertheless, the above-referenced discovery is not relevant to the issues raised in Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

EDUARDO VALENCIA CARDENAS VS MISSION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, ET AL.

.: 18STCV08080 [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. July 7, 2020 Background Facts Plaintiff, Eduardo Valencia Cardenas filed this action against Defendants, Mission Community Hospital, Hrak Derderian, M.D., and Goyal Maheep for medical malpractice arising out of Defendants’ care and treatment of him in connection with an emergency room visit following an automobile accident. Motion for Summary Judgment Moving Argument At this time, Dr.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

FERNANDO HERNANDEZ VS GEORGE "FRANK" ALVAREZ

It appears to the court that Alvarez is seeking reconsideration of the court’s February 7, 2019 denial of Alvarez’s motion for summary judgment and the court’s October 10, 2019 denial of Alvarez’s motion for CCP § 128.7 sanctions, without complying with CCP § 1008. The motion is denied. 2.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

DANIELLA AFSHAR VS MICHAEL OBENG MD ET AL

CASE NO: BC701555 [TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dept. 31 10:30 a.m. July 7, 2020 Defendants, Michael Obeng, M.D. and Miko Surgery Center filed this motion for summary judgment on 12/20/19, setting it for hearing on 3/09/20. On 2/28/20, Defendants gave notice that the Court, on its own motion, continued the hearing from 3/09/20 to 3/18/20. Due to the ongoing pandemic, the hearing was continued multiple times thereafter, and is now set on 7/07/20.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

DANUSHA REMBAUM VS BRISTOL FARMS

On April 14, 2020, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Bristol Farms filed a motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication against Plaintiff pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 437c. On April 16, 2020, the Court continued the hearing on Defendant/Cross-Complainant Bristol Farms’ motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication to July 7, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

SEAN LUMPKIN VS JAMES BARROS

Motion for Summary Judgment Defendant HOA’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defendant HOA is ordered to give notice of this ruling. The parties are directed to the header of this tentative ruling for further directions.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

A. CHARLES WILSON VS CENTURY CITY MEDICAL PLAZA, L.P., ET AL.

Defendant’s arguments are more appropriately suited for a motion for summary judgment where the Court may take evidence into consideration.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

“In this case, Gogri filed his request for voluntary dismissal … after JIB filed its motion for summary judgment and after Gogri filed his papers opposing that motion, his dismissal was filed before the trial court issued its tentative ruling on JIB's motion on March 1.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

GUERRERO VS. BALLARD

Motion: 1) Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication 2) Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication 3) Joinder ALL MOTIONS OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTIES

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

AZZE VS. WONG

HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY TONY WONG, et al. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Defendants’ Tony Wong, Yvonne Wong, et al.’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Defendants’ motion for summary adjudication is granted in part and denied in part. Background On January 15, 2010, Plaintiff Badr Sanane Azze entered into a commercial Lease for property located at 134 East 10th St. in Pittsburg, with the owners, Defendants Tony and Yvonne Wong.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

STEPHENS VS. WELLS FARGO

HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. * TENTATIVE RULING: * The hearing is continued by the Court to July 16, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 33.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

JOSHUA DUBINSKY VS JIM MULHEARN, ET AL.

Quisenberry Law Firm (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 654, 660-661 [In considering a joinder motion, the Court noted: “A special motion to strike differs significantly from a motion for summary judgment in one procedural aspect. In order to establish a prima facie case for summary judgment, a moving party defendant must present admissible evidence establishing a complete defense to the claim or that plaintiff will be unable to prove an essential element of the claim. [Citation.]

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

CAMACHO VS. JLG INDUSTRIES, INC.

Proc. § 437c(f)(2) prevents a party from bringing a second motion for summary judgment on the same issues as the first motion unless the party establishes to the satisfaction of the court that newly discovered facts or circumstances, or change in the law, support the issue reasserted in the second motion for summary judgment. In other words, under this provision a party may renew a motion for summary judgment under the same standards it would renew another kind of motion it lost under Code Civ.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

RICHWELL FABRICATORS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

For the foregoing reasons, Edison’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Defendant Edison is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

GARRET ADELMAN, ET AL. VS JEROME ADELMAN, ET AL.

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION (CCP § 437c) TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiffs Garret Adelman and Justin Adelman’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication, is CONTINUED TO AUGUST 6, 2020 AT 10:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE. AT THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL, PLAINTIFFS ARE TO ADDRESS THE MANNER IN WHICH THIS ACTION CAN PROCEED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

DISCUSSION: Motion To Compel Arbitration Plaintiff’s Evidentiary Objections There is no authority holding that the Court must rule on an evidentiary objection made in connection with a motion other than a motion for summary judgment or an anti-SLAPP motion.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

HESPER NATALE, ET AL V. SKY RIVER, INC., ET AL

Defendants further argue that Natale cites only one case in support of her demurrer, FPI Development, Inc, supra, 231 Cal.App.3d 367 (“FPI”), and that case is misleading because addresses the pleading standard for a motion for summary judgment, not a demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

HESMIG SINANIAN LOPEZ VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

.: BC647085 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. July 2, 2020 I.INTRODUCTION On January 18, 2017, plaintiff Hesmig Sinanian Lopez filed this action against the City of Los Angeles arising from a April 25, 2016 trip and fall on raised concrete in front of 9213 Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles California.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

VAN DUSEN VS. RAY CAMMACK SHOWS, INC.

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication ***Motion continued to 10/29/2020***

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.