On April 04, 2019 a
Proof of Service
was filed
involving a dispute between
City Of Agoura Hills,
City Of Angels Camp,
City Of Arcadia,
City Of Atwater,
City Of Beverly Hills,
City Of Ceres,
City Of Clovis,
City Of Covina,
City Of Dixon,
City Of Downey,
City Of Mcfarland,
City Of Newman,
City Of Oakdale,
City Of Palmdale,
City Of Patterson,
City Of Riverbank,
City Of Riverside,
City Of San Pablo,
City Of Sonora,
City Of Tehachapi,
City Of Temecula,
City Of Tracy,
City Of Turlock,
City Of Vacaville,
County Of Santa Cruz,
and
Ajax, Lori,
Bureau Of Cannibas Control,
for 39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review
in the District Court of Fresno County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA - COUNTY 0F FRESNO IEntered by:
Civil Department -Non-Limited 1
I
TITLE 0F CASE; r
‘
County of Santa Cruz vs Bureau of Cannabis Control I
i
Case Number:
LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER -
19CECGo1224
Hearing Date: August 6, 2020 Hearing Type: Writ of Mandate
Ex Parte Motion to Submit Amicus Curiae Brief
Department: 502 Judge/Temp. Judge: McGuire, Rosemary
Court Clerk: Garcia, Sam Reporter/Tape: Not Reported
Appearing Parties:
Plaintiff: Defendant:
Counsel: Steven Churchwell (cc) Counsel: Harinder Kapur (cc), Ethan Turner (cc), Robert White (cc),
Todd Noonan (cc) Tamara Colson (cc), Dana Cisneros (cc), Robert Kahn (cc)
[x] Court finds good cause to grant the ex parte application to submit amicus curiae brief. Amicus curiae brief
is due on or before 8-14-20.
Hearing continued to allow further briefing on the issue of ripeness. The parties agreed to an extended briefing
schedule. The court sets the briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiff’s brief is due on or before 9-21-20.
Defendant's response is due on or before 10-21-20. Plaintiff’s reply is due on or before 10-28-20.
[x] Continued to 11-16-20 at 10:00 a.m. in Dept. 502 for Writ of Mandate.
[ ]
Submitted on points and authorities with/without argument. [x] Matter isargued and submitted.
[ ]
Upon filing of points and authorities.
[ ]
Motion isgranted [ ]
inpart and denied in part. [ ]
Motion is denied [
]with/without prejudice.
[
]Taken under advisement
[ ]
Demurrer [ ]
overruled [ ]
sustained with _ days to [ ]
answer [ ]
amend
[
]Tentative ruling becomes the order of the court. No further order isnecessary.
[ ]
Pursuant to CRC 3.1312(a) and CCP section 1019.5(a), no further order is necessary. The minute order adopting
the tentative ruling serves as the order of the court.
[ ]
Service by the clerk willconstitute notice of the order.
[ ]
See attached copy of the Tentative Ruling.
[ ]
Judgment debtor _ sworn and examined.
[ ]
Judgment debtor _ failed toappear.
Bench warrant issued in the amount of $_
JUDGMENT:
[ ]
Money damages [ ]
Default []
Other _ entered inthe amount of:
Principal $_ Interest $_ Costs $_ Attorney fees $_ Total $__
[
]Claim of exemption [
]granted [
]denied. Court orders withholdings modified to $_ per__
FURTHER, COURT ORDERS:
[
]Monies held by levying officerto be [
]releasedtojudgmentcreditor. [
]retumed tojudgmentdebtor.
[ ]$_ to be judgment
released to creditorand balance returned tojudgment debtor.
[ ]Levying Officer, County of_, notified. [ ]Writ to issue
[ ]Notice to be filed within15 days. [ ]
Restitution of Premises
[
]Other: _
CV-14b R03-18
u __________
LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER
J
1
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO 1
FOR COURTUSEONLY
i
CivilDepartment, Central Division
1 130
"O“ Street
I
Fresno,California 93724-0002
(559) 457-2000 i
TITLE 0F CASE:
County of Santa Cruz vs Bureau of Cannabis Control
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 0F MAILING CfingcElégfigfi
|certify that |am not a party to this cause and that a true copy of the:
MINUTE ORDER DATED 8-6-2020
was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below
following our ordinary business practice. |am readily familiar with this court’s practice for collecting and processing
correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence isplaced for collection and mailing, itis deposited
in
the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service wi prepaid.
ostaT fully
Place of mailing:
On Date:
Fresno,California
08/1 0/2020
93724-0002
Clerk, by 342/
Ml , Deputy
S. Garcia
Steven G Churchwell Harinder K Kapur
Churchwell White LLP 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800
1414 K Street, 3rd Floor San Diego, CA 92101
Sacramento, CA 95814
D Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Additional Address Page Attached
TGN-06b R0806 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
Document Filed Date
August 06, 2020
Case Filing Date
April 04, 2019
Category
39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA - COUNTY 0F FRESNO IEntered by: Civil Department -Non-Limited 1 I TITLE 0F CASE; r ‘ County of Santa Cruz vs Bureau of Cannabis Control I i Case Number: LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER - 19CECGo1224 Hearing Date: August 6, 2020 Hearing Type: Writ of Mandate Ex Parte Motion to Submit Amicus Curiae Brief Department: 502 Judge/Temp. Judge: McGuire, Rosemary Court Clerk: Garcia, Sam Reporter/Tape: Not Reported Appearing Parties: Plaintiff: Defendant: Counsel: Steven Churchwell (cc) Counsel: Harinder Kapur (cc), Ethan Turner (cc), Robert White (cc), Todd Noonan (cc) Tamara Colson (cc), Dana Cisneros (cc), Robert Kahn (cc) [x] Court finds good cause to grant the ex parte application to submit amicus curiae brief. Amicus curiae brief is due on or before 8-14-20. Hearing continued to allow further briefing on the issue of ripeness. The parties agreed to an extended briefing schedule. The court sets the briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiff’s brief is due on or before 9-21-20. Defendant's response is due on or before 10-21-20. Plaintiff’s reply is due on or before 10-28-20. [x] Continued to 11-16-20 at 10:00 a.m. in Dept. 502 for Writ of Mandate. [ ] Submitted on points and authorities with/without argument. [x] Matter isargued and submitted. [ ] Upon filing of points and authorities. [ ] Motion isgranted [ ] inpart and denied in part. [ ] Motion is denied [ ]with/without prejudice. [ ]Taken under advisement [ ] Demurrer [ ] overruled [ ] sustained with _ days to [ ] answer [ ] amend [ ]Tentative ruling becomes the order of the court. No further order isnecessary. [ ] Pursuant to CRC 3.1312(a) and CCP section 1019.5(a), no further order is necessary. The minute order adopting the tentative ruling serves as the order of the court. [ ] Service by the clerk willconstitute notice of the order. [ ] See attached copy of the Tentative Ruling. [ ] Judgment debtor _ sworn and examined. [ ] Judgment debtor _ failed toappear. Bench warrant issued in the amount of $_ JUDGMENT: [ ] Money damages [ ] Default [] Other _ entered inthe amount of: Principal $_ Interest $_ Costs $_ Attorney fees $_ Total $__ [ ]Claim of exemption [ ]granted [ ]denied. Court orders withholdings modified to $_ per__ FURTHER, COURT ORDERS: [ ]Monies held by levying officerto be [ ]releasedtojudgmentcreditor. [ ]retumed tojudgmentdebtor. [ ]$_ to be judgment released to creditorand balance returned tojudgment debtor. [ ]Levying Officer, County of_, notified. [ ]Writ to issue [ ]Notice to be filed within15 days. [ ] Restitution of Premises [ ]Other: _ CV-14b R03-18 u __________ LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER J 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO 1 FOR COURTUSEONLY i CivilDepartment, Central Division 1 130 "O“ Street I Fresno,California 93724-0002 (559) 457-2000 i TITLE 0F CASE: County of Santa Cruz vs Bureau of Cannabis Control CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 0F MAILING CfingcElégfigfi |certify that |am not a party to this cause and that a true copy of the: MINUTE ORDER DATED 8-6-2020 was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. |am readily familiar with this court’s practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence isplaced for collection and mailing, itis deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service wi prepaid. ostaT fully Place of mailing: On Date: Fresno,California 08/1 0/2020 93724-0002 Clerk, by 342/ Ml , Deputy S. Garcia Steven G Churchwell Harinder K Kapur Churchwell White LLP 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800 1414 K Street, 3rd Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Sacramento, CA 95814 D Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Additional Address Page Attached TGN-06b R0806 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING