arrow left
arrow right
  • ALAM, SAM vs. GOMES, ANDREW (MD) FRAUD document preview
  • ALAM, SAM vs. GOMES, ANDREW (MD) FRAUD document preview
  • ALAM, SAM vs. GOMES, ANDREW (MD) FRAUD document preview
  • ALAM, SAM vs. GOMES, ANDREW (MD) FRAUD document preview
						
                                

Preview

SAM ALAM, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § v. § 165th JUDICIAL DISTRICT § ANDREW GOMES, MD; MAHENDRA AGRAHARKAR, MD; AJAY CHOUDHRY, MD; RADIOLOGY PARTNERS, PLLC; NIRP MANAGEMENT, LLC, NIRP PASADENA, PLLC, NIRP SUGARLAND, PLLC Defendants § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR NO-EVIDENCE SUMMARY JUDGMENT After considering Defendants’ Motion for No Evidence Summary Judgment, the GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for No Evidence Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s causes of action for Gross Negligence, Negligence Per Se, violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Constructive Fraud, and Aiding and Abetting as Plaintiff has not presented any argument or tion thus conceding these claims; and GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for No Evidence Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s causes of action for Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Negligent Misrepresentation, Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations, Fraud, Fraudulent Inducement, and esented more than a scintilla of evidence to support any of these claims. Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to take nothing on its claims. 4834-2275-7492 v1 2934734-000003 09/26/2018 SIGNED on _________________, 2018 4834-2275-7492 v1 2934734-000003 09/26/2018