On June 30, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Drisonline.Com Inc,
and
Agraharkar, Mahendra,
Choudhry, Ajay,
Gomes, Andrew,
National Interventional Radiology Partners Management Llc,
Nirp Management Llc,
Nirp Pasadena Pllc,
Nirp Sugarland Pllc,
for FRAUD
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
6/5/2019 8:21 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 34146816
By: LISA COOPER
Filed: 6/5/2019 8:21 PM
2017-43835
CAUSE NO. 20+9-36346—
ALAM, SAM ayy\
DRISCREINECOMING— § INTHE DISTRICT COURT OF
PLAINTIFF, §
§ CCcSL
Vv § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS a /
ANLCY
ANDREW E. GOMES, MD § 4esTH
DEFENDANT. § MSPHIUDICIAL DISTRICT
CAIN TIERS MOTION TO COMPED
On this the 10 day of folonnang, 2019, came on to be heard Plaintiff,
Drisonline.com’s Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendant, Andrew Gomes, MD;
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Sanction. The Court, after having considered the
same, finds the following:
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is:
GRANTED x DENIED
Defendant’s Motion to Consolidate with the First Case is:
x GRANTED DENIED
Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions is:
Jof 2 RECORDER'S MEMORANDUM
This instrument is of poor quality
at the time of imaging(1) GRANTED Xx DENIED
(2; Awards Defendant rcasonabteattomey*s-fee-of whichthe
c 7 fair;
“G) Awants Defendant eests-of —______- and
“Cty Orders Praimtiff7 Ptaimtiff’s attomcy 7 both to pay sanctions of
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: “edo nA 207 2020
Tus case is Werelr Consolidated ints Cause No,
LOV1- 4333S \n Hue (W5t Tristict Conet.
This comsolidation is \oeing Granted with Hee
permission ae e Hall, Hu presi dl v4 Juase of
Be 1US Bidvict Court.
2of 2
Document Filed Date
February 20, 2020
Case Filing Date
June 30, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
6/5/2019 8:21 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 34146816 By: LISA COOPER Filed: 6/5/2019 8:21 PM 2017-43835 CAUSE NO. 20+9-36346— ALAM, SAM ayy\ DRISCREINECOMING— § INTHE DISTRICT COURT OF PLAINTIFF, § § CCcSL Vv § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS a / ANLCY ANDREW E. GOMES, MD § 4esTH DEFENDANT. § MSPHIUDICIAL DISTRICT CAIN TIERS MOTION TO COMPED On this the 10 day of folonnang, 2019, came on to be heard Plaintiff, Drisonline.com’s Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendant, Andrew Gomes, MD; Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Sanction. The Court, after having considered the same, finds the following: Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is: GRANTED x DENIED Defendant’s Motion to Consolidate with the First Case is: x GRANTED DENIED Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions is: Jof 2 RECORDER'S MEMORANDUM This instrument is of poor quality at the time of imaging(1) GRANTED Xx DENIED (2; Awards Defendant rcasonabteattomey*s-fee-of whichthe c 7 fair; “G) Awants Defendant eests-of —______- and “Cty Orders Praimtiff7 Ptaimtiff’s attomcy 7 both to pay sanctions of IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: “edo nA 207 2020 Tus case is Werelr Consolidated ints Cause No, LOV1- 4333S \n Hue (W5t Tristict Conet. This comsolidation is \oeing Granted with Hee permission ae e Hall, Hu presi dl v4 Juase of Be 1US Bidvict Court. 2of 2