On August 04, 2014 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
The New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, Inc.,
and
New York State Attorney General,
for Contract (Non-Commercial)
in the District Court of Kings County.
Preview
INDEX NO. 507138/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 96 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/01/2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
Sc a tiga
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF
THE NEW HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST
CHURCH, INC., a Religious Corporation, AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT
Petitioner,
Index No: 507138/2014
To Sell, Transfer and Convey its Real Property
Situate in the County of Kings, State of New York
reactance
ion eneiSaneRT!
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY KINGS )SS.:
B. MITCHELL ALTER, ESQ., being an attorney duly admitted to practice before the
Courts of the State of New York hereby affirms the following under the penalty of
perjury:
1. Lam the appeal counsel for Famek Management Corp (Famek) and as such am
fully familiar with the facts. | submit this affirmation in support of the instant motion to
hold Maor in contempt of Court, allow management by Famek and stay any further
transfer and enforcement of the Deed to Eli Maor dated August 18, 2016, recorded on
September 1, 2016.
2. As this Court is aware, a stay was granted by this Court on September 2, 2016
(Exhibit “A") and the Petitioner and Maor made a motion in the Appellate Division to
1 of 3
vacate the temporary restraining Order and preliminary injunction which said relief was
denied by the Appellate Division (See Exhibit “C" and “D".
3. |, on behalf of Famek, along with Jason Levine from Thomas Torto's law office on
behalf of Maor and Petitioner appeared on the return date of this motion at the
courtroom of Justice Jimenez-Salta. The Judge was not there.
4. Jason Levin, Esq., the petitioner's attorney, did not want to adjourn the matter for
the court to hear the case. He was in a hurry to submit the papers for the court's
review.
5. At his request, the Judge's Part clerk marked the matter submitted. At no time was
there any argument nor any hearing of the motion. As such, the stay continues.
6. Subsequently, Angelyn Johnson, counsel for Famek sent me a copy of the housing
Court motion filed by the Stark Law firm seeking relief in an eviction proceeding. |
immediately wrote to Mr. Ampov from the Stark Law firm and informed him that there
was never a hearing and that the stay continues. | further called Thomas Torto's office
and spoke to Mr. Torto informing him that there was no hearing. Mr. Torto informed me
that he had to consult with Mr. Levine and would call me back. To date, neither Mr.
Levine nor Mr. Torto has called me back although | have left messages for them.
7. | further emailed Mr. Ampov and informed him that the stay continued and that
there was no hearing. See Exhibit “H". Despite my efforts, it appears that Petitioner
and Maor intend to willfully violate the stay.
7. No prior application for the relief requested has been previously made except for
what is herein stated.
2 of 3
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the motion be granted and for such other
and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
December 1, 2016
fo =—
B. MITCHELL ALTER, ESQ.
3 of 3
Document Filed Date
December 01, 2016
Case Filing Date
August 04, 2014
Category
Contract (Non-Commercial)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.