arrow left
arrow right
  • The New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. v. New York State Attorney GeneralContract (Non-Commercial) document preview
  • The New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. v. New York State Attorney GeneralContract (Non-Commercial) document preview
  • The New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. v. New York State Attorney GeneralContract (Non-Commercial) document preview
  • The New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. v. New York State Attorney GeneralContract (Non-Commercial) document preview
  • The New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. v. New York State Attorney GeneralContract (Non-Commercial) document preview
  • The New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. v. New York State Attorney GeneralContract (Non-Commercial) document preview
						
                                

Preview

INDEX NO. 507138/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 96 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/01/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS Sc a tiga IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., a Religious Corporation, AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT Petitioner, Index No: 507138/2014 To Sell, Transfer and Convey its Real Property Situate in the County of Kings, State of New York reactance ion eneiSaneRT! STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY KINGS )SS.: B. MITCHELL ALTER, ESQ., being an attorney duly admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of New York hereby affirms the following under the penalty of perjury: 1. Lam the appeal counsel for Famek Management Corp (Famek) and as such am fully familiar with the facts. | submit this affirmation in support of the instant motion to hold Maor in contempt of Court, allow management by Famek and stay any further transfer and enforcement of the Deed to Eli Maor dated August 18, 2016, recorded on September 1, 2016. 2. As this Court is aware, a stay was granted by this Court on September 2, 2016 (Exhibit “A") and the Petitioner and Maor made a motion in the Appellate Division to 1 of 3 vacate the temporary restraining Order and preliminary injunction which said relief was denied by the Appellate Division (See Exhibit “C" and “D". 3. |, on behalf of Famek, along with Jason Levine from Thomas Torto's law office on behalf of Maor and Petitioner appeared on the return date of this motion at the courtroom of Justice Jimenez-Salta. The Judge was not there. 4. Jason Levin, Esq., the petitioner's attorney, did not want to adjourn the matter for the court to hear the case. He was in a hurry to submit the papers for the court's review. 5. At his request, the Judge's Part clerk marked the matter submitted. At no time was there any argument nor any hearing of the motion. As such, the stay continues. 6. Subsequently, Angelyn Johnson, counsel for Famek sent me a copy of the housing Court motion filed by the Stark Law firm seeking relief in an eviction proceeding. | immediately wrote to Mr. Ampov from the Stark Law firm and informed him that there was never a hearing and that the stay continues. | further called Thomas Torto's office and spoke to Mr. Torto informing him that there was no hearing. Mr. Torto informed me that he had to consult with Mr. Levine and would call me back. To date, neither Mr. Levine nor Mr. Torto has called me back although | have left messages for them. 7. | further emailed Mr. Ampov and informed him that the stay continued and that there was no hearing. See Exhibit “H". Despite my efforts, it appears that Petitioner and Maor intend to willfully violate the stay. 7. No prior application for the relief requested has been previously made except for what is herein stated. 2 of 3 WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the motion be granted and for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Dated: Brooklyn, New York December 1, 2016 fo =— B. MITCHELL ALTER, ESQ. 3 of 3