On October 04, 2017 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Taghavi, Ali,
and
Alticor, Inc., A Michigan Corporation,
Does 1-10, Inclusive,
The Leland Stanford Junior University, A California Nonprofit Corporation,
for (36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
“Mm -
MARCIE ISOM FITZSIMMONS
AMBER A. EKLOF
(SBN: 226906) F E {a IE L)
(SBN: 305750) SAN MATé-ém mm
N GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
275.Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 941 11
(415) 986—5900
.mw'
Telephone: - n"...zi'2.
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 By
misom@grsm.com
aeklof@grsm.com
Attorneys for Defendant
TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
OOQQUI
STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, erroneously sued as
THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
\O SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
LLP
11
2000
12
94111
ALI TAGHAVI, an individual, ) CASE NO. 17CIV04570
Mansukhani,
Suite
)
CA
13 Plaintiff,
) [ ] ORDER REGARDING
Street,
)
EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN
14 vs. ORDER SHORTENING TINIE TO
Scully
Francisco,
)
HEARSTANFORD’S MOTION TO
15
Battery
THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR )
QUASH AND MOTION T0 COMPEL
Rees
San UNIVERSITY, a California nonprofit )
FURTHER RESPONSES TO
275 ‘16 corporation, doing business as STANFORD ) DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR.
Gordon UNIVERSITY; ALTICOR, INC., a Michigan ) PRODUCTION OF DOCUNIENTS,
17 corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
g
18 Defendants. ) Date: November 8, 201 8
) Time: 2:00 PM
’
19 —
-r
‘\
)
Dept: Law and Motion
1-1-c1v—0457o
)
20 gm. Complaint Filed: October 4, 2017
)
1491825 Trial Date: December 17, 2018
)
21
\\\\\\\\\\\ \\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
22
D-efé—ndafit TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY,
23
erroneously sued as THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY’S (“Stanford”) ex
24
parte application for an Order Shortening Time to hear Stanford’s Motion to Quash Indigo
25
Partners Subpoena, and Motion to Compel Further Responses to Defendant’s Request for
26
Production of Documents was heard on Thursday, November 8,2018 at 2:00PM in the Law and
27
Motion Department of the above referenced court.
28 .
_ 1_
PROPOSED] ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON
STANFORD’S MOTION TO QUASH INDIGO PARTNERS SUBPOENA AND MOTION T0 COMPEL
FURTHER RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
After evaluating the Stanford’s briefs, the court file, arguments of counsel, and FOR
GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:
U.)
Stanford’s ex parte application is GRANTED.
Stanford’s Motion to Quash Indigo Partners Subpoena 1s now set for hearing 0n
NO Vflbflf 2%, 2018at 1-0‘9
m v
Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition papers by ,
2018.
(8
Plaintiff may serve the documents by fax, email, personal service, or overnight mail.
\OOOQQ
smrflmvé‘o; ,
’7’“R Stanford
mil; MuA.
10 Stanford’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Defendant’s Request for Production
LLP
11 of Documents, Request for Sanctions is now set for hearing 0n MN 2b
'
,
2018
2000
12 at flzocam
fl
94111
Mansukhani,
MOVw
Suite
CA
13 Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition papers by “a ,
2018.
Street,
14 Plaintiff may serve the documents by fax, email, personal service, or overnight mail.
Scully
Francisco,
15
Battery
Rees
50m U
San
275
16
Gordon
17
18
19
20
21
22
Dated:
IT IS
NWUMLW
SO ORDERED.
3 ,
2018.
\
Judge of the Superior Court
SUSAN GHEENB’ERG
s
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME 0N
STANFORD’S MOTION T0 AND MOTION T0 COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES T0 DEFENDANT’S
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Document Filed Date
November 08, 2018
Case Filing Date
October 04, 2017
Category
(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
“Mm - MARCIE ISOM FITZSIMMONS AMBER A. EKLOF (SBN: 226906) F E {a IE L) (SBN: 305750) SAN MATé-ém mm N GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 275.Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 941 11 (415) 986—5900 .mw' Telephone: - n"...zi'2. Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 By misom@grsm.com aeklof@grsm.com Attorneys for Defendant TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND OOQQUI STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, erroneously sued as THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY \O SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LLP 11 2000 12 94111 ALI TAGHAVI, an individual, ) CASE NO. 17CIV04570 Mansukhani, Suite ) CA 13 Plaintiff, ) [ ] ORDER REGARDING Street, ) EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN 14 vs. ORDER SHORTENING TINIE TO Scully Francisco, ) HEARSTANFORD’S MOTION TO 15 Battery THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR ) QUASH AND MOTION T0 COMPEL Rees San UNIVERSITY, a California nonprofit ) FURTHER RESPONSES TO 275 ‘16 corporation, doing business as STANFORD ) DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR. Gordon UNIVERSITY; ALTICOR, INC., a Michigan ) PRODUCTION OF DOCUNIENTS, 17 corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS g 18 Defendants. ) Date: November 8, 201 8 ) Time: 2:00 PM ’ 19 — -r ‘\ ) Dept: Law and Motion 1-1-c1v—0457o ) 20 gm. Complaint Filed: October 4, 2017 ) 1491825 Trial Date: December 17, 2018 ) 21 \\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 22 D-efé—ndafit TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, 23 erroneously sued as THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY’S (“Stanford”) ex 24 parte application for an Order Shortening Time to hear Stanford’s Motion to Quash Indigo 25 Partners Subpoena, and Motion to Compel Further Responses to Defendant’s Request for 26 Production of Documents was heard on Thursday, November 8,2018 at 2:00PM in the Law and 27 Motion Department of the above referenced court. 28 . _ 1_ PROPOSED] ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON STANFORD’S MOTION TO QUASH INDIGO PARTNERS SUBPOENA AND MOTION T0 COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS After evaluating the Stanford’s briefs, the court file, arguments of counsel, and FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN: U.) Stanford’s ex parte application is GRANTED. Stanford’s Motion to Quash Indigo Partners Subpoena 1s now set for hearing 0n NO Vflbflf 2%, 2018at 1-0‘9 m v Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition papers by , 2018. (8 Plaintiff may serve the documents by fax, email, personal service, or overnight mail. \OOOQQ smrflmvé‘o; , ’7’“R Stanford mil; MuA. 10 Stanford’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Defendant’s Request for Production LLP 11 of Documents, Request for Sanctions is now set for hearing 0n MN 2b ' , 2018 2000 12 at flzocam fl 94111 Mansukhani, MOVw Suite CA 13 Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition papers by “a , 2018. Street, 14 Plaintiff may serve the documents by fax, email, personal service, or overnight mail. Scully Francisco, 15 Battery Rees 50m U San 275 16 Gordon 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: IT IS NWUMLW SO ORDERED. 3 , 2018. \ Judge of the Superior Court SUSAN GHEENB’ERG s 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME 0N STANFORD’S MOTION T0 AND MOTION T0 COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES T0 DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS