Preview
MARCIE ISOM FITZSIMIVIONS
AMBER A. EKLOF
GORDON REES
(SBN: 305750)
(SBN:
SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
226906)
F I L
SAN MATEO COUNTY
E D
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
'
.
San Francisco, CA 94111
NOV 0 5 2018
Telephone: (415) 986~5900
986—8054 c'e'ko’ 700""
Facsimiles:
misom@grsm.com
(415)
aeklof@grsm.com
By
m
Attorneys for Defendant
TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
7 STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, erroneously sued as
THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
R
17— cw— 04570 \
AMOTNF
AmendedNotice of Motion and Motion to
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
i
1475821
i
COUNTY 0F SAN MATEO
llilllll
|l|l|_| l"
J
12 ALI TAGHAVI, an individual, CASE NO. 17CIV04570
13 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT STANFORD’S
AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION
14 VS. TO COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR
15 THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS,
UNIVERSITY, a California nonprofit REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
16 corporation, doing business as STANFORD vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
UNIVERSITY; ALTICOR, INC., a Michigan
17 corporation; and DOES 1—10, inclusive, Date: January 2, 2019
Time: 9:00 AM
18 Defendants. Dept: Law & Motion
19
20
21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on January 2, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as
22 this matter may be heard, in the Law & Motion Department of this court, located at 400 County
23 Center, Redwood City, CA 94063, Defendant TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD
24 JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, erroneously sued as THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
WW; 25 UNIVERSITY (“Stanford”) Will and hereby does move for a Motion to Compel in their favor
26 and against Plaintiff Ali Taghavi (“Plaintiff”), further responses and the production of documents
27 to Stanford’s Request for Production of Documents, Set Two; and Stanford’s Request for
Q 28 Production of Documents, Set Three. Defendant also moves for a Motion t0 Compel in their
-1-
DEFENDANT STANFORD’S AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION TO COWEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO
REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
favor and against Plaintiff for sanctions in the amount of $4,650.00 for his abuse of the discovery
process. This motion is based upon this Notice of Hearing, the Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support: filed herewith, the Separate Statement, the Declaration 0f Amber Eklof,
the pleadings, files, and records, and upon such oral and/or documentary evidence as may be
presented at the time of the hearing of this motion.
Novembef GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
WWW
Dated: 2,201 8
\OOOQQ
By I
Marcie Isom Fitzsimmons
Amber A. Eklof
10 Attorneys for Defendant
TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD
11 JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, erroneously sued as THE
LLP
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
2000
12
94111
Mansukhani,
Suite 13
CA
Street,
‘14
Scully
Francisco,
15
Battery
Rees
16
San
275
Gordon
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
DEFENDANT STANFORD’S AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO
REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUIVIENTS, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
PROOF OF SERVICE
Ali Taghavi v. The Leland Stanford University
San Mateo Superior Court Case N0. 1 7CIV045 70
I am a resident 0f the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party
to the Within action. My business address is: Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 275 Battery
Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 941 11. On the date below, I served the within documents:
DEFENDANT STANFORD’S ANIENDED NOTICE 0F MOTION TO COMPEL
FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS,
REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
Via Electronic Transmission: By transmitting via electronic mail the document(s) listed
above to the e-mail address(es) set forth below.
Fredrick A. Hagen
10 BERDING & WEIL LLP
2175 N. California Blvd, Suite 500
11 Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone: 925—838-2090
12 Facsimile: 925-820-5592
fllagen@berdingweil.com
13
Plaintiff’s Counsel
14
David P. Zins Karen J. Kubin
15 Morrison & Foerster LLP Morrison & Foerster LLP
707 Wilshire B1Vd., Suite 6000 425 Market Street
16 Los Angeles, CA 94105 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 213—892-5200 Telephone: 415-268-7000
17 Facsimile: 213—892-5454 Facsimile: 415—268-7522
dzinngmofocom kkubin@mofo.com
18
Counselfor Defendant Alticor, Inc. Counselfor Defendant Alticor, Inc.
19
20 I am readily familiar with the fmn’s practice of collection and processing correspondence
for mailing. Under that practice itwould be deposited With the U. S. Postal Service on that same
day With postage thereon fully prepaid 1n the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
21
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage
22 meter date ls more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing 1n affidavit.
23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
is true and correct.
24
Executed on November 2, 2018 atSan Francisco, California.
25
26
27 Vanessa Santellan
28
1121340/41069226v.1
-3-
DEFENDANTS STANFORD’S AWNDED NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO
REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
Preview
MARCIE ISOM FITZSIMIVIONS AMBER A. EKLOF GORDON REES (SBN: 305750) (SBN: SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 226906) F I L SAN MATEO COUNTY E D 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 ' . San Francisco, CA 94111 NOV 0 5 2018 Telephone: (415) 986~5900 986—8054 c'e'ko’ 700"" Facsimiles: misom@grsm.com (415) aeklof@grsm.com By m Attorneys for Defendant TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND 7 STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, erroneously sued as THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY R 17— cw— 04570 \ AMOTNF AmendedNotice of Motion and Motion to SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA i 1475821 i COUNTY 0F SAN MATEO llilllll |l|l|_| l" J 12 ALI TAGHAVI, an individual, CASE NO. 17CIV04570 13 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT STANFORD’S AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION 14 VS. TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR 15 THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, UNIVERSITY, a California nonprofit REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS 16 corporation, doing business as STANFORD vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv UNIVERSITY; ALTICOR, INC., a Michigan 17 corporation; and DOES 1—10, inclusive, Date: January 2, 2019 Time: 9:00 AM 18 Defendants. Dept: Law & Motion 19 20 21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on January 2, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as 22 this matter may be heard, in the Law & Motion Department of this court, located at 400 County 23 Center, Redwood City, CA 94063, Defendant TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD 24 JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, erroneously sued as THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR WW; 25 UNIVERSITY (“Stanford”) Will and hereby does move for a Motion to Compel in their favor 26 and against Plaintiff Ali Taghavi (“Plaintiff”), further responses and the production of documents 27 to Stanford’s Request for Production of Documents, Set Two; and Stanford’s Request for Q 28 Production of Documents, Set Three. Defendant also moves for a Motion t0 Compel in their -1- DEFENDANT STANFORD’S AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION TO COWEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS favor and against Plaintiff for sanctions in the amount of $4,650.00 for his abuse of the discovery process. This motion is based upon this Notice of Hearing, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support: filed herewith, the Separate Statement, the Declaration 0f Amber Eklof, the pleadings, files, and records, and upon such oral and/or documentary evidence as may be presented at the time of the hearing of this motion. Novembef GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP WWW Dated: 2,201 8 \OOOQQ By I Marcie Isom Fitzsimmons Amber A. Eklof 10 Attorneys for Defendant TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD 11 JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, erroneously sued as THE LLP LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY 2000 12 94111 Mansukhani, Suite 13 CA Street, ‘14 Scully Francisco, 15 Battery Rees 16 San 275 Gordon 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- DEFENDANT STANFORD’S AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUIVIENTS, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS PROOF OF SERVICE Ali Taghavi v. The Leland Stanford University San Mateo Superior Court Case N0. 1 7CIV045 70 I am a resident 0f the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the Within action. My business address is: Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 941 11. On the date below, I served the within documents: DEFENDANT STANFORD’S ANIENDED NOTICE 0F MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS Via Electronic Transmission: By transmitting via electronic mail the document(s) listed above to the e-mail address(es) set forth below. Fredrick A. Hagen 10 BERDING & WEIL LLP 2175 N. California Blvd, Suite 500 11 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: 925—838-2090 12 Facsimile: 925-820-5592 fllagen@berdingweil.com 13 Plaintiff’s Counsel 14 David P. Zins Karen J. Kubin 15 Morrison & Foerster LLP Morrison & Foerster LLP 707 Wilshire B1Vd., Suite 6000 425 Market Street 16 Los Angeles, CA 94105 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 213—892-5200 Telephone: 415-268-7000 17 Facsimile: 213—892-5454 Facsimile: 415—268-7522 dzinngmofocom kkubin@mofo.com 18 Counselfor Defendant Alticor, Inc. Counselfor Defendant Alticor, Inc. 19 20 I am readily familiar with the fmn’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice itwould be deposited With the U. S. Postal Service on that same day With postage thereon fully prepaid 1n the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 21 motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage 22 meter date ls more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing 1n affidavit. 23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. 24 Executed on November 2, 2018 atSan Francisco, California. 25 26 27 Vanessa Santellan 28 1121340/41069226v.1 -3- DEFENDANTS STANFORD’S AWNDED NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS