arrow left
arrow right
  • ALI TAGHAVI  vs.  THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • ALI TAGHAVI  vs.  THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • ALI TAGHAVI  vs.  THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • ALI TAGHAVI  vs.  THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • ALI TAGHAVI  vs.  THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • ALI TAGHAVI  vs.  THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • ALI TAGHAVI  vs.  THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • ALI TAGHAVI  vs.  THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
						
                                

Preview

Wau Fredrick A. Hagen, California Bar.No. 196220. BERDING & WEIL LLP 2175 N. California Blvd, Suite 500 FILED Walnut Creck,.California 94596 Telephone: 925-838-2090 SAN MATEO COUNTY Facsimile: 925-820-5592 NOV 0-8 2018 fhagen@berdingweil.com kpinco@berdingweil:com Clerkof r Gourt Attomeys for Plaintiff Ciel ALI TAGHAVI > eee 47-WV—04570 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA jimmy = EVID 1 Evidence 447! u ALI TAGHAVI, an individual, No. 17CIV04570 1 oa 12 Plaintiff, LODGED — CONDITIONALLY UNDER SEAL 13 VS. INDEX OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF 1 14 THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR PLAINTIFF ALI TAGHAVI’S UNIVERSITY, a California nonprofit OPPOSITION TO STANFORD’S 15 corporation, doing business as STANFORD UNTIMELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY UNIVERSITY; ALTICOR, INC.; a Michigan JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION 16 corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Date: November 16, 2018 17 Defendants. Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: Law and Motion 18 Complaint Filed: October 4, 2017 19 Trial Date: December 17, 2018 / 20 Pursuant to rule.3.1350, subdivisions (c) and (g) of the California Rules of Court, Plaintiff 21 Ali Taghavi hereby submits the following declaration, with related ‘exhibits; in support of its 22 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgmient/Adjudication!. 23 Mt 24 ut 25 26. 27 1 The Deelatation(s) filed- concurrently herewith, attach excerpts and exhibits from Plaintiffs deposition as well as.a mimber of other dociiments served in discovery in the above- 28 captioned action, as Plaintiff's deposition testimony has been designated confidential. -1- BERDING & WEIL iLe INDEX OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF ALI TAGHAVIS OPPOSITION 10 DEFENDANT Been tind daneee STANFORD’S UNTIMELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION Me, a RD mo, s: Ss: <; + Sout | | RETACHUMENT / DESCRIPTION . 2 1 Declaration of Ali Taghavi 3 2 Declaration of Fred A. Hagen 4 3 Declaration of Scott Bates 4 Declaration of Andrew T. Stevenson 5 Stanford’s offer of employment to Plaintiff Ali Taghavi, dated and executed Exhibit A 6 on June 12, 2015. Defendant Alticor, Inc,’s Gift Agreement with Defendant Board of Trustees Exhibit B of The Leland Stanford Junior University, dated August 15, 2014 and executed on. August 13, 2014 and August 14, 2014, Emails between Defendant Alticor, Inc. and’ Plaintiff Ali Taghavi and Exhibit C WELL Project guidelines. 10 Email string between Plaintiff and Defendants regarding non-approval of Exhibit D 11 requested new proposed WELL Project guidelines Exhibit E Monthly Stanford Prevention Research Center newsletter and related email 12 Exhibit F Email exchange between Sandra Winters and Stanford Development Office 13 Exhibit G Email from Elsie Wang to Plaintiff re “action items” 14 Email from Plaintiff to Elsie Wang containing the. PR and Marketing plan Exhibit H 15 for the WELL Project Exhibit I Email from Plaintiff to Stanford employee John Ioannidis re concerns 16 Email. from Plaintiff io Elsie Wang re “follow up items” and containing the 17 Exhibit J PR and Marketing plan for the WELL Project 18 Email from Elsie Wang to other Stanford employees informing of Exhibit K Plaintiff's termination from Stanford. 19 Email from Mike Cazer to Amway Region Presidents, produced by Alticor, Exhibit L 20 Inc. as ALTO002200 Email from Keith Randolph to Audra Davies, Produced by Alticor, Inc. as 21 Exhibit M ALT0002318-2319 22 Timeline of WELL Project events produced by Allticor, Inc. as Exhibit N ALT0002469-2472 23 Email from Amway’s Todd Woodward, responding to Ali Taghavi’s refusal 24 Exhibit ° to alter publicity. limitations, produced by Alticor, Inc. as ALT0014114- 14116 25 Email from Sam Rehnborg to John Farquar, dated March 16, 2016 and 26 Exhibit P produced by Alticor, Inc. as ALT0002930-2931 27 Meeting notes indicating Alticor Inc.’s dissatisfaction with the lack of Exhibit Q publicity, produced by Alticor, Inc. as ALT0002453 28 2- INDEX OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF ALI TAGHAVI’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ‘alot Cree, Car 6596 STANFORD'S UNTIMELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION Email string between Stanford and Alticor, Inc. re dissatisfaction with Exhibit R publicity video, produced by Allticor, Inc. as ALT0016617 Exhibit § Plaintiff's deposition testimony Email from Keith Randolph critically describing facilitation of WELL Exhibit T Project and Stanford employees involved, produced by Alticor, Inc. as ALT0005997 June 6, 2016 Alticor, Inc. emails regarding Plaintiff's termination produced Exhibit U by Alticor, Inc. as ALT0013096 Exhibit V Deposition testimony of Catherine Heaney Exhibit W Email from counsel for Stanford regarding failure to effectuate service Date: November 2, 2018 BERDIN WEIL LLP 10 11 AI Fredrick A. Hagen Attomey for Plaintiff 12 ALI TAGHAVI 13 X:AWdocs\823619 |\PLD\00964034.DOCX 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. BERDING & WEILL? INDEX OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF ALI TAGHAVI'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT cee STANFORD’S UNTIMELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/ADIJUDICATION