Answer: JOHN T. LOMBARD et al VS. SWEET LEAF LLC, A HAWAII LIMITED LIABILITY et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                MA

San Francisco Superior Courts
Information Technology Group

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-22-2005 1:59 pm

Case Number: CGC-05-437927
Filing Date: Apr-22-2005 1:57
Juke Box: 001 Image: 01184356
ANSWER

JOHN T. LOMBARD et al VS. SWEET LEAF LLC, A HAWAII LIMITED LIABILITY et al

001001184356

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned,Sent By: Anthony & Carlson LLP; 510 835 5566; Apr-22-05 1221 0PM; Page 2

ANTHONY & CARLSON LLP
1999 HARRESON STREET, SUITE 2000
‘OAKLAND, CA 94612

Cc C

1/RICHARD H. CARLSON, ESQ. (SBN 039547)
ANTHONY & CARLSON Lip

271999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000
Oakland, California 94612

3} Telephone: (510) 835-8400

Facsimile: (510) 835-5566

| Attomeys for Defendants and Cross Complainants
S| JACK HUGHES, an individual; KAREN HUGHES,
[ an individual; and SWEET LEAF LLC, a Hawaii

6] limited liability corporation

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNLIMITED JURISDICTION BY F ‘AX

HON T. LOMBARDO and GWENDOLYN ) Docket No.: CGC-05-437927
JA. COOKE, ) :
12 ) CROSS DEFENDANTS’ HUGHES
F Plaintiffs, ) ANSWER TO UNVERIFIED CROSS
B ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY
“ vs. ; RELIEF AND COMPARATIVE
SWERT LEAF LLC, a Hawaii limited isbility) INDEMNITY

13} company; TRENT BATEMAN, an individual; )
LISA BATEMAN, an individual; JACK )
16 HUGHES, an individual; MOUNTAIN )
THUNDER COFFEE PLANTATION INT’SL)
174INC., a Hawaii corporation; and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,

Defendants,

| JACK HUGHES, KAREN HUGHES, and
SWEETLEAF LLC,

TRENT BATEMAN, LISA BATEMAN,
MOUNTAIN THUNDER COFFEE
PLANTATION INT'L INC. and FIRST
DOE THROUGH TENTH DOE,

)
)
2
)
)
)
Cross-Complainants, )
)
)
)
)
)
)
Cross-Defendants. )

Lombardo, John vs, Hughes [SFSC # CGC-05-437927) - Cross Defendants’ Hughes Answer to
Unverified Cross Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Comparative Indemnity

. «le
Bo I21218GARLAND, CA 94618

ANTHONY & CARLSON LLP
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 2000

Sent By: Anthony & Carlson LLP; 510 835 5566; Apr-22-05 12:10PM; Page 3/4

C C

Come now Jack Hughes and Karen Hughes and Answer said Cross Complaint.
L

Said cross defendants deny each and every, all and singular, the allegations of said cross
complaint. ,
I

In the alternative, should a monetary judgment be had in favor of plaintiffs, or either of
them, and against cross defendants, or either of them, cross defendants pray said judgment be
equitably apportioned according to apportionment of fault underlying said Monetary judgment
to achieve a comparative liability according to the percentage of fault of each judgment debtor.
WHEREFORE said cross defendants pray judgment be had as prayed, Dated and /s/

HW
12
DATED: April 22, 2005 ANTHONY & CARLSON Lip
13
4 ( :
18 Richard H. Carlson
Attomeys for Cross-Complainants

Lombardo, Joba vs, Hughes [SFSC # CGC-05-437927} ~ Cross Defendants Hughes Answer to
Unverified Cross Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Comparative Indemnity
: 2.Sent By: Anthony & Carlson LLP;

‘OAKLAND, CA 94612

ANTHONY & CARLSON LLP
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 2000

J

510 635 5566; ~ Apr-22-05 12:141PH; Page 4/4

C C

PROOF OF SERVI

I declare that 1 am over the age of 18 ycars and employed in the city of Oakland,
County of Alameda, State of California. Iam not a party to the within entitled cause; my
business address is 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000, Oakland, Califomia 94612.

On the date shown below, I served the parties of said cause the within documents:

CROSS DEFENDANTS’ HUGHES ANSWER TO UNVERIFIED CROSS COMPLAINT
FOR DECLARATION RELIEF AND COMPARATIVE INDEMNITY

xx (BY MAIL) placing a true copy of the above-referenced document(s),
enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, in the United States
mail st Oakland, California, for collection and mailing on the date and a the
place shown above following our ordinary business practices. I am readily
familiar with this firm's practice for collecting and processing :
correspondence for mailing,

(BY FACSIMILE) in addition to service by mail as forth above, the person(s)
by whose name an asterisk is affixed, were also forwarded a copy of the
documents described via facsimile, :

(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) by placing a true and correct copy thereof in a
sealed envelope(s), and placed the same with the ANTHONY & CARLSON
LLP's mail room personnel for pickup by Federal Express in accordance with
the firm’s ordinary practices. :

(PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand
to the office(s) and/or residence(s) of the addressee(s). :

David P. Wasserman, Esq.
Daniel R. Stem, Esq.
Wasserman-Taxman

2960 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109-1020

Kenneth A. Brunetti, Esq.

Miller & Van Eaton LLP

400 Montgomery Street, Suite SOL
San Francisco, CA 94104

I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of: California, that the
foregoing is tne and correct. Executed on April 22, 2005 at Oakland, California.

~~ Linda Nellessen