arrow left
arrow right
  • LUIS PAEZ VS EQUITY ONE, INC.(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • LUIS PAEZ VS EQUITY ONE, INC.(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • LUIS PAEZ VS EQUITY ONE, INC.(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • LUIS PAEZ VS EQUITY ONE, INC.(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • LUIS PAEZ VS EQUITY ONE, INC.(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • LUIS PAEZ VS EQUITY ONE, INC.(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • LUIS PAEZ VS EQUITY ONE, INC.(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • LUIS PAEZ VS EQUITY ONE, INC.(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slato Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY James F Waite, Esq, SBN 078475 Law Offices of Chnstian B Green 555 Mission Street,Suite 320, San Francisco, CA 94105 TELEPHONE NO41 5-932-7223 866-853-8846 FAX NO (Op"anat) E-MAILADDRESS (Optronat) ATTQRNEY FQR(Nemo)Equity One, InC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 0 5 2015e sTREETADDREssHall of Justiceand Records MAILINGADDREss 4QQ County Center C Pr Ss If)af COIje ciTYANDzip coDE Redwood City, CA 94063 BRANGH NAME 91 Southern Branch PLAINTIFF/PETITIQNER Luis Paez LL DEFENDANT/REsPQNDENT Equity One, Inc,et al, CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT K CASE NUMBER 5 (Check one) UNLIMITEDCASE (Amount demanded H LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded is $ 25,000 CIV 529263 exceeds $ 25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENTCONFERENCE is scheduledas follows Date March 26, 2015 Time 9 00 a m Dept 7 Dlv Room Address of court (if different from the address above) Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by(name) James F Waite/N La Force/R Lewne/S Chiappella INSTRUCTIONS All applicableboxes must be checked, and the specifiedinformation must be prowded Party or parties (answer one) ~v'his a b ~ statement This statement is submitted is submitted by party (name) Equity One, Iomtly by parties (names) lnc 2 Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answeredby plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a The complaint was filed on (date) b ~Z The cross-complaint,if any, was filed on (date) October 9, 2014 3 Serwce (to be answeredby plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) ~v'll a b ~ (1) parties ~ named in the complaint and cross-complaint The following parties have named not been have been served, in the complaint or cross-complaint served (specify namesand explain why not) have appeared, or havebeen dismissed (2) ~ have been served but havenot appeared and have not beendismissed (specify names) (3) ~ have had a default entered againstthem (specify names) c ~ The following additional they may be served) partiesmay be added (specify names,natureof involvement in case, and dateby which 4 Descnption of case a Type of casein ~v complaint cross-complaint (Descnbe, including causesof action) Alleged personal in)uries Page1of 5 Farm Adapted for Mandatory Use Judtaal Coural of Cahfarnta CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT Cal Rules of Court, rules 3 720-3 730 CM-110 [Rev July 1,2011] www courts ca gov CM-110 PLA)NTIFF/PETITIONER Luis Paez CASE NUMBER CIV 529263 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Equity One, Inc, et al, 4 b Provide a bnef statement of the case,including any damages (Ifpersonal in/ury damages are sought,specify the inlury and damages claimed,including medical expensesto date /indicate source and amount), estimatedfuture medical expenses,lost earningsto date,and estimated If equitable future lost earnings relief is sought, descnbe the natureof the relief) Alleged personal in|uriesfrom fall at shoppingmall (Ifmore spaceis needed,check this box and attach a page designatedas Attachment 4b ) 5 Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties requesting request a /ury tnal) ~V a lury tnal M a nonlury tnal (Ifmore than of each party one party, provide the name 6 a b ~ Trial date ~v The tnal hasbeen No trial date has set for (date) been setThis case for tnal within 12 months will be ready of the dateof the filing of the complaint (if not, explain) c Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for tnal (specify dates and explain reasonsfor unavailabikty) Trials 5/22/15, 6/8/15,6/1 9/1 5, 6/23/1 5, 7/27/1 5, 7/1 3/1 5, 9/25/1 5, 8/1 0/1 5, 9/28/1 5, 10/5/1 5 7 Estimated length of tnal The party or parties estimate that the tnal will take (check one) a b ~ CJ7 days hours (specify number) (shoit causes) Five (specify) 8 Tnal representation The party or parties a Attorney (to be answeredfor each will be represented at tnal ~ party) by the attorney or party listed in the caption ~ by the following b Firm c Address d Telephone number f Fax number e E-mail address Party represented g Additional representation is descnbedin Attachment8 9 Preference This caseis entitled to preference (specify codesection) 10 Alternative disputeresolution (ADR) a ADR information package Please note that different ADR processes are availablein different courts and communities, read the ADR information package providedby the court under for information about the processes rule 3 221 availablethroughthe court andcommunity programs in this case (1) For parties represented by counselCounsel Me'as W has not provided the ADR information packageidentified to the client and in rule 3 221 reviewedADR options with the client (2) For self-represented partiesPartyH has M has not reviewed the ADR information packageidentified in rule 3221 b (1) ~ Referralto judicial arbitration This matter mediation statutory under Code limit or civil action is sublect to mandatory mediation of Civil Procedure section (if available) Iudicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure 1775 3 because the amount section in controversy 1141 does 11 or to civil action not exceedthe (2) ~ Plaintiff elects to refer this case Civil Procedure section1141 11 to judicial arbitration and agreesto limit recovery to the amountspecifiedin Code of (3) ~ This caseis exempt from judicial arbitration mediationunder Code of Civil Procedure under section of the California Rules rule 3 811 1775 et seq (specify exemption) of Courtor from civil action CM-110 [Rev July 1. 2011I CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT Page 2 of 5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER Luis Paez CASE NUMBER DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT CIV 529263 Equity One, Inc, et al, 10 c Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreedto partiapate in, or have alreadypartiapatedin (check all that apply and prowde the specified information) The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to willing to this form are participate in or havealreadycompleted an ADR process or processes, partiapatein the following ADR indicate the status of the processes a copy of the parties'DR (attach processes (check all that apply) stipulation) Mediation sessionnot yet scheduled Mediation sessionscheduled for (date) (1) Mediation Agreed to completemediation by (date) Mediation completedon (date) Settlementconference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlementconference scheduled for (date) conference Agreed to completesettlementconference by (date) Settlementconference completed on (date) Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date) (3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to completeneutralevaluationby (date) Neutral evaluation completed on (date) Judiaalarbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding ludiaal Judiaalarbitration scheduled for (date) arbitration Agreed to completeludicial arbitration by (date) Judiaalarbitration completed on (date) Pnvate arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding pnvate Pnvate arbitration scheduled for (date) arbitration Agreed to completepnvate arbitration by (date) Pnvate arbitration completed on (date) ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date) (6) Other (specify) Agreed to completeADR session by (date) ADR completed on (date) CM-110 [Rev July 1 2011] Page 3 of 5 CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT Cllti-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER CASE NUMBER Luis Paez CIV 529263 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Equity One, Inc, et al, 11 Insurance a b c ~v'nsurance ~ Reservation earner, of nghts Coverage issues ~ for party filing this statement if any, Yes ~v No (name) will significantly affect resolution of this case National (explain) FireInsurance Company of Hartford 12 Junsdiction ~ Status Bankruptcy ~ Indicate any matters that may affect the court's lunsdiction or processing Other (specify) of this case and descnbe the status 13 ~ Related cases, consolidation, There are (1) Name companion, of case and coordination or related underlying, cases (2) Name of court (3) Case number ~ ~ (4) Status ~ Additional cases b A motion to are descnbed ~ in Attachment consolidate 13a coordinate will be filed by (name party) 14 ~ Bifurcation The party or parties action intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, sevenng, type of motion, and reasons) (specify moving party, or coordinating the following issues or causes of 15 ~ Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions beforetnal type of motion, and issues) (specify moving party, 16 a b ~ Discovery ~v'he The party or parties have completed all discovery following discovery will be completed by the datespecified(descnbe alt anticipated discovery) ~Part Descnotion Date all ongoing ongoing ~ The following discovery antiopated (specify) issues,including issues regardingthe discoveryof electronically stored information, are CM-110 [Rev July 1, 2011I CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT Page 4 of 5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER Luis Paez CASE NUMBER CIV 529263 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Equity One, Inc, et al, 17 a ~ Economic litigation This is a limited civil case (I e,the amount demanded is $ 25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code b ~ of Civil Procedure sections90-98 will apply to this case This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case discovery will be filed (ifchecked, from the economic explain specifically why economic ktigation procedures or for additional litigation procedures relating to discovery or tnal should not apply to this case) 18 ~ C)therissues The party or parties conference request (specify) that the following additional mattersbe considered or determinedat the case management 19 a ~ Meet and confer The party or parties have met and of Court (ifnot, explain) conferredwith all parties on all sublects requiredby rule 3 724 of the California Rules b After meetingand confernngas requiredby rule 3 724 of the California Rules of Court,the parties agreeon the following (specify) 20 Total number of pagesattached (ifany) I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss of discovery the status and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issuesraised-bythis statement, and will possess the authonty to enter into stipulations on these issuesat the time of the casemanagement conference,including the wntten authonty of the party where requird Date March 5, 2015 James F Waite (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) ~ (TYPE OR PRINT NAblE) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signatures areattached I, 2011] Cb1-110 [Rev July CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT of 5 Page 5 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL [CCP ) 1013(a) and CCP ) 2015 5] I, the undersigned, declare. I am, and was at all times herein mentioned, employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of Cahfornia I am over 18 years of age and not a party to the within action My business address is555 Mission Street, Suite 320, San Francisco, Cahfornia 94105 On the date set forth below, I served the within CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail at San Francisco, Cahfornia, addressed as 10 follows Broderick H Brown, Esq Attorney for Plaintiff 12 Broderick H Brown Law Firm LUIS PAEZ 2831 Telegraph Avenue 13 Oakland, CA 94609 TEL 510-452-6300 14 FAX 510-417-9197 15 Alison K Hurley, Esq Attorneys for Cross-Defendant Bremer, Whyte, Brown &, O'Meara LLP CROWN BUILDINGMAINTENANCECO 16 20320 S W Birch Street, Second Floor dba ABLE BUILDINGMAINTENANCECO Newport Beach, CA 92660 17 TEL: 949-221-1000 FAX 949-221-1001 18 19 I am "readily famihar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing 20 correspondence for mailmg, that the correspondence would be deposited with the U.S Postal 21 Service on the same day in the ordinary course ofbusmess I am aware that on motion of a party 22 served, service is presumed invahd ifpostal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 23 one day after date of deposit for maihng in the affidavit. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Cahfornia that the 25 foregoing is true and correct 26 Dated March 5, 2015 27 , .&gsa +Inriea C. Smedley 28