On November 18, 2015 a
Hearing
was filed
involving a dispute between
Les Stanford Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc,
Saberi, Andy,
and
Bj Interstate Autotransporters, Inc,
Dedyk, Bogdan,
Les Stanford Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc,
for (06) Unlimited Breach of Contract/Warranty
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
Case Number: CIV536294
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
400 County Center 1050 Mission Road
Redwood City, CA 94063 South San Francisco, CA 94080
www.sanmateocourt.org
Minute Order
ANDY SABERI VS LES STANFORD, ETAL CIV536294
December 28, 2016 9:00 AM
Hearing on Demurrer
Judicial Officer: Etezadi, Susan I Location: Courtroom 2M
Courtroom Clerk: Lynn Felise Courtroom Reporter: Niki Makela
Parties Present
Exhibits
Minutes
Journals
- MOVING PARTY shall prepare formal order consistent with order herein.
- Tentative ruling adopted and becomes order:
DEMURRER
Defendant LES STANFORD CHEVROLET CADILLAC, INC. has not complied with Code Civ. Proc. Sec.
430.41(a). The statute provides that before filing a demurrer, the demurring party shall meet and confer
in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the demurrer, for the
purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be
raised in the demurrer.
The hearing on the demurrer is therefore continued to January 11, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in the Law and
Motion Department so that the parties may meet and confer. The demurring party is required to file, no
later than five days prior to the new hearing date, a Code-compliant declaration stating either: (1) the
parties have met and conferred in person or by telephone and (a) the parties have resolved the
objections raised in the demurrer, which shall be taken off calendar or (b) the parties did not reach an
agreement resolving the objections raised in the demurrer; or (2) the party who filed the pleading
subject to demurrer failed to respond to the meet and confer request or otherwise failed to meet and
confer in good faith. If the demurring party fails to file and serve the declaration demonstrating
compliance with the requirements of Section 430.31, the demurrer will be stricken as procedurally
improper.
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to CRC Rule
3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, the moving party is
directed to prepare, circulate and submit a written order reflecting this Court’s ruling verbatim for the
Court’s signature, consistent with the requirements of CRC Rule 3.1312. The proposed order is to be
submitted directly to Judge Susan Irene Etezadi, Department 18.
1
Case Number: CIV536294
- No appearance by any parties herein or their counsel of record.
Case Events
Future Hearings and Vacated Hearings
February 09, 2017 9:00 AM Case Management Conference
Case Management Conferences, -
2
Document Filed Date
December 28, 2016
Case Filing Date
November 18, 2015
Category
(06) Unlimited Breach of Contract/Warranty
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Case Number: CIV536294 SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY 400 County Center 1050 Mission Road Redwood City, CA 94063 South San Francisco, CA 94080 www.sanmateocourt.org Minute Order ANDY SABERI VS LES STANFORD, ETAL CIV536294 December 28, 2016 9:00 AM Hearing on Demurrer Judicial Officer: Etezadi, Susan I Location: Courtroom 2M Courtroom Clerk: Lynn Felise Courtroom Reporter: Niki Makela Parties Present Exhibits Minutes Journals - MOVING PARTY shall prepare formal order consistent with order herein. - Tentative ruling adopted and becomes order: DEMURRER Defendant LES STANFORD CHEVROLET CADILLAC, INC. has not complied with Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 430.41(a). The statute provides that before filing a demurrer, the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the demurrer, for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. The hearing on the demurrer is therefore continued to January 11, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in the Law and Motion Department so that the parties may meet and confer. The demurring party is required to file, no later than five days prior to the new hearing date, a Code-compliant declaration stating either: (1) the parties have met and conferred in person or by telephone and (a) the parties have resolved the objections raised in the demurrer, which shall be taken off calendar or (b) the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised in the demurrer; or (2) the party who filed the pleading subject to demurrer failed to respond to the meet and confer request or otherwise failed to meet and confer in good faith. If the demurring party fails to file and serve the declaration demonstrating compliance with the requirements of Section 430.31, the demurrer will be stricken as procedurally improper. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, the moving party is directed to prepare, circulate and submit a written order reflecting this Court’s ruling verbatim for the Court’s signature, consistent with the requirements of CRC Rule 3.1312. The proposed order is to be submitted directly to Judge Susan Irene Etezadi, Department 18. 1 Case Number: CIV536294 - No appearance by any parties herein or their counsel of record. Case Events Future Hearings and Vacated Hearings February 09, 2017 9:00 AM Case Management Conference Case Management Conferences, - 2