arrow left
arrow right
  • CYNTHIA HOLLOWAY VS. GILEAD SCIENCES, ET AL(15) Unlimited Other Employment document preview
  • CYNTHIA HOLLOWAY VS. GILEAD SCIENCES, ET AL(15) Unlimited Other Employment document preview
  • CYNTHIA HOLLOWAY VS. GILEAD SCIENCES, ET AL(15) Unlimited Other Employment document preview
  • CYNTHIA HOLLOWAY VS. GILEAD SCIENCES, ET AL(15) Unlimited Other Employment document preview
						
                                

Preview

Case Number: CIV537937 SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY 400 County Center 1050 Mission Road Redwood City, CA 94063 South San Francisco, CA 94080 www.sanmateocourt.org Minute Order CYNTHIA HOLLOWAY VS. GILEAD SCIENCES, ET AL CIV537937 March 07, 2017 9:30 AM Motion to Disqualify Counsel Judicial Officer: Dylina, Steven L Location: Courtroom 8B Courtroom Clerk: Jada Obaob Courtroom Reporter: Megan Zalmai Parties Present BACA, ELENA R. Attorney DERRY, RYAN D Attorney DICKSON, KATHRYN Attorney BURKETT GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. Defendant HOLLOWAY, CYTHINA Plaintiff SUBBOTIN, KYRA A. Attorney WOHL, JEFFERY D Attorney Exhibits Minutes Journals - Honorable Steven L. Dylina, Judge presiding. Clerk: Jada Obaob. Court Reporter: Megan Zalmai. Above-noted counsel and parties, present. Counsel Elena Baca and Ryan Derry from the Law Offices of Paul Hastings LLP for Gilead Sciences, Inc. appeared by CourtCall. Counsel Muchael Kun from the Law Offices of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. for Aerotek, Inc. appeared by CourtCall. At 9:28, Court convenes. The Court addresses all counsel and parties. This hearing is to remain confidential. The courtroom is closed to the public. The Court's Tentative Ruling is read into the record. Mr. Wohl makes his arguments to the Court. Ms. Subbotin makes her arguments to the Court. Mr. Kun makes his arguments to the Court. Matter submitted. Having considered the submitted matter, the court rules as follows: Defendant's Motion to Disqualify Counsel is DENIED. The Court's tentative ruling is adopted and becomes order. 1 Case Number: CIV537937 Plaintiff's counsel to submit formal order consistent with the Court's tentative ruling and send it directly to dept. 7 for signature. Mr. Wohl request that this matter be stayed or continued so that defendant's counsel may have the right to file an appeal of the Court's tentative ruling if necessary. Ms. Subbotin objects to Mr. Wohl's request. The court finds/orders: The Court will continue this matter for 90 days. The Defendants have all the right to appeal this ruling and it may be filed at the Court of Appeals. Hearing continued to June 9, 2017 at 9:00 AM. Court adjourn. Case Events Future Hearings and Vacated Hearings June 09, 2017 9:00 AM Further Proceedings Dylina, Steven L 2