On January 13, 2014 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Flor America Paredes Ruiz,
and
Wong, Donald,
Wong, Sandra,
for (22) Limited Auto - 10,000 to 25,000
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
Case Number: CLJ526228
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
400 County Center 1050 Mission Road
Redwood City, CA 94063 South San Francisco, CA 94080
www.sanmateocourt.org
Minute Order
FLOR AMERICA PAREDES RUIZ VS SANDRA WONG ETAL CLJ526228
07/11/2017 9:00 AM
Motion for Order
Judicial Officer: DuBois, Richard H Location: Courtroom 7A
Courtroom Clerk: Jane Torres; Andrea Daley Courtroom Reporter: Diana Masetti
Parties Present
Exhibits
Minutes
Journals
- No appearance by any parties herein or their counsel of record.
Tentative ruling adopted and becomes order:
MOTION FOR ORDER IMPOSING TERMINATING SANCTIONS:
Defendant's motion for a terminating sanction is GRANTED. Plaintiff failed to comply with a court order
compelling discovery. Pursuant to CCP 2023.030(d), plaintiff's complaint is dismissed.
In this case, the evidence indicates that terminating sanctions are appropriate. In opposition to the
motion to compel plaintiff's counsel indicated that plaintiff had moved and his efforts to contact her
were unsuccessful. He asked that any order compelling a response give plaintiff 30 days to comply.
Consistent with that request, the court ordered plaintiff to respond to the written discovery within 30
days of notice of entry of the order. Defendant served plaintiff with the court's order by mailing a copy
to her attorney on January 17, 2017. To date, she has not complied. This conduct suggests that plaintiff
is not interested in pursuing her case and that no lesser sanction would encourage her to comply with
her discovery obligations.
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to CRC Rule
3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, defendant is directed to
prepare, circulate, and submit a written order reflecting this Court's ruling verbatim for the Court's
signature, consistent with the requirements of CRC Rule 3.1312. The proposed order is to be submitted
directly to Judge Richard H. DuBois, Department 16.
Case Events
Others
Comments:
Future Hearings and Vacated Hearings
1
Case Number: CLJ526228
2
Document Filed Date
July 11, 2017
Case Filing Date
January 13, 2014
Category
(22) Limited Auto - 10,000 to 25,000
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Case Number: CLJ526228 SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY 400 County Center 1050 Mission Road Redwood City, CA 94063 South San Francisco, CA 94080 www.sanmateocourt.org Minute Order FLOR AMERICA PAREDES RUIZ VS SANDRA WONG ETAL CLJ526228 07/11/2017 9:00 AM Motion for Order Judicial Officer: DuBois, Richard H Location: Courtroom 7A Courtroom Clerk: Jane Torres; Andrea Daley Courtroom Reporter: Diana Masetti Parties Present Exhibits Minutes Journals - No appearance by any parties herein or their counsel of record. Tentative ruling adopted and becomes order: MOTION FOR ORDER IMPOSING TERMINATING SANCTIONS: Defendant's motion for a terminating sanction is GRANTED. Plaintiff failed to comply with a court order compelling discovery. Pursuant to CCP 2023.030(d), plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. In this case, the evidence indicates that terminating sanctions are appropriate. In opposition to the motion to compel plaintiff's counsel indicated that plaintiff had moved and his efforts to contact her were unsuccessful. He asked that any order compelling a response give plaintiff 30 days to comply. Consistent with that request, the court ordered plaintiff to respond to the written discovery within 30 days of notice of entry of the order. Defendant served plaintiff with the court's order by mailing a copy to her attorney on January 17, 2017. To date, she has not complied. This conduct suggests that plaintiff is not interested in pursuing her case and that no lesser sanction would encourage her to comply with her discovery obligations. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, defendant is directed to prepare, circulate, and submit a written order reflecting this Court's ruling verbatim for the Court's signature, consistent with the requirements of CRC Rule 3.1312. The proposed order is to be submitted directly to Judge Richard H. DuBois, Department 16. Case Events Others Comments: Future Hearings and Vacated Hearings 1 Case Number: CLJ526228 2