arrow left
arrow right
  • Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 Thomas Dimitre, Attorney at Law L.L.C. CSB # 276924 2 dimitre@mind.net PO Box 801 3 Ashland, OR 97520 4 Telephone: 541-890-5022 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 COUNTY OF BUTTE 8 CIVIL DIVISION 9 10 11 TERESA RANDOLPH, an individual Case No. 19CV01226 12 Plaintiff [PROPOSED] ORDER 13 v. Date: January 29, 2020 14 Time: 1:30 pm Dept: 10 TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA Judge: Robert A. Glusman 15 STATE UNIVERSITY, STATE OF Trial Date: none 16 CALIFORNIA, AND CYNTHIA DALEY, Action Filed: April 24, 2019 AN INDIVIDUAL, AND DEBRA 17 LARSON, AN INDIVIDUAL 18 Defendants 19 20 21 22 On October 25, 2019, Defendants State of California, Trustees of the California State 23 University, Cynthia Daley and Debra Larson (collectively “Defendants”) filed a Motion for 24 25 Judgment on the Pleadings against Plaintiff, Teresa Randolph. 26 27 28 1 1 On January 29, 2020, at 1:30 pm in Department 10, Defendants appeared through counsel 2 of record, Deputy Attorney General Jerry Deschler, while Plaintiff, Teresa Randolph appeared 3 through her counsel, Thomas Dimitre. 4 Good cause appearing, the Court rules as follows: 5 6 7 1. Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 8 The Court orders the following regarding Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the 9 Pleadings: 10 a. Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is: DENIED. Pursuant to CCP 438(f), a 11 defendant may file a motion for judgment on the pleadings only after time to demur has expired 12 13 and an answer has been filed. In the present action, Defendants have not yet filed an answer. 14 Thus, this motion is premature and is denied. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED 17 18 19 Dated: _____________________ ______________________ Judge of the Superior Court 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 CERTIFICATE 0F SERVICE I, Thomas Dimitre, declare as follows: I am an employee of Thomas Dimitre, Attorney at Law, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. My business address is PO BOX 801, Ashland, Oregon 97520; My business telephone number is (541) 890-5022, and my fax number is. (541) 488-4601. On February 7, 2020 I served the foregoing document(s) described as: 1. Proposed Order by placing true copies thereof in sealed envelopes with postage lO thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at ASHLAND, OR addressed as ' 11 shown below: 12 13 Jerry Deschler Jr. Deputy Attorney General IV 14 1300 I Street 15 Sacramento, CA 95814 16 I declare, under penalty of perjury under the law: of he State of California, that l7 the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 7, 2020 at Ashland OR. 18 19 20 THOMAS ITRE 21 .Attomey fo laintiff, Teresa Randolph 22 23 24 25 26 2.7 28