Preview
~\/
‘
R CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
-
Jody M. Burgess, SBN 222061
Clinton M. Boren, SBN 263200
‘x'
MAIRE & BURGESS
2851 Park Marina Dr., Ste. 300
Redding, CA 96001
246-6050
..
TELEPHONENO.: (530) (530)
FAXNo.(0pn‘onaI): 246—6060 E"
jburgess@maire-law. com
E-MAILADDRessmpriona/J: Couniv 01 Butte E
Defs STEPHEN MELINE, IV, et al.
ArrORNEYFORwame):
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA,COUNTY 0F BUTTE
a
L 1 3 23M
, L
STREETADDRESS: 655 Oleander Avenue
JAM E
MAILINGADDRESS:P.O. BOX 310 D erl‘
’ ne Cley/ D
CITYANDZIPCODE:ChiCO, California 95926 y 9- Y
BRANCH NAME: Unlimited
w
pLAINTIFF/PETITIONERzEDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENTzJACK MELINE, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE ”UMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded
D LIMITED CASE 12 7 1 8 0
(Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: January 21, 2014 Time: 8 : 30 a.m. Dept: tba Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): JODY M. BURGESS
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specied information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a.
b. D
This statement is submitted by party (name):Stephen
This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Meline , IV; Robert J . Meline;
Nelda F. Jessee; and
Melanie G. Edgington
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was led on (date): March 6, 2 002
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was led on (date): February 3, 2 003
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross—complaint have been served, have
appeared. or have been dismissed.
b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) E have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed
(specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. E The following additional paIties may be added (specify names, nature ofinvolvement in
they may be served):
case, and date by which
4. Description ofcase
a. Type ofcasein complaint cross-complaint (Describe,inc/uding causes ofaction):
Partition action relative to ranch and rice lands
Fonn Adopted for Mandatory Use Page1of5
ecu... organic... CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110[Rev. JuIy1,2011]
(gal C?la.i“§$2%’f‘7“;‘d
SObnS‘us
a
CM-11o
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:EDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al. CASENUMBER?
127180
—DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:JACK MELINE, et al.
4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (lfpersona/ injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date ndicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
earnings to date,and estimated future lostearnings. Ifequitable describe the nature of the relief.)
relief is sought,
The parties maintain an interest in separate properties known as the ranch
land which has been actively partioned before the assigned Referee, Judge
Watkins (Retired) .
(If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
5. Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request a jury trial a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name ofeach pan‘y
requesting a jury trial);
6. Trial date
a. The trial has been set for (date): Sept . 8, 2014
b. 12 months of the date ofthe
No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within ling of the complaint (if
not, explain):
c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
The parties currently have a date set in April of 2014 to establish the
The Court has appointed Judge Noel Watkins (Ret.) as thc rcfcree for all purposes.
on
interlocutory judgmentthemannerof to
partition follow.
Discoveryhasbeen propoundedby all sides and experts are engaged and were previously
disclosed as required under the California Civil Discovery Act.
7. Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take {check one):
a. days (specify number): 1O
b. hours (short causes) (specify):
8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial in the caption
by the attorney or party listed by the following:
a. Attorney:
b. Firm:
c. Address:
d. Telephone number: f. Fax number:
e E~mail address: g. Party represented:
Additional representation is described inAttachment 8.
9. Preference A
This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the
court and community programs in this case.
(i) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has has not provided-the ADR information package identied
in rule 3.221to theclient and reviewed ADR options with the client.
(2) For self-represented parties: PartyE has has not reviewed the ADR information package identied in rule3.221.
b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
(1) This matter is subject to mandatoryjudicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
statutory limit.
(2) inCode of
Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specied
Civil Procedure section 1141 .1 1.
(3) This case of the California Rules of
is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 Court or from civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption):
CM-110 [Rev. Juiy Page 2 of5
1.2011]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: EDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al . CASE NUMBER;
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JACK MELINE, et al. 127180
10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to
participate in, or
have already participated in (check all that app/y and provide the specied information):
The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case
have agreed to
this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties'ADR
processes (check all that apply): stipulation):
Mediation session not yet scheduled
(1) Mediation
E Mediation session scheduled for (date):
Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
Mediation completed on (date):
Settlement conference not yet scheduled
(2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date);
conference
:1 Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
Settlement conference completed on (date):
Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
Neutral evaluation scheduled for ( date):
(3) Neutral evaluation
Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
I: Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
(4) Nonbinding judicial D E JudiCIal arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration
D Agreed to completejudicial arbitration by (date):
D Judicial arbitration completed on (date):
Private arbitration not yet scheduled
(5) Binding private
arbitration E E
Private arbitration scheduled for (date):
Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
Private arbitration completed on (date):
E ADR session not yet scheduled
ADR session scheduled for (date):
(6) Other (specify):
Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
ADR completed on (date):
CM-iio [Ravi Juiy
2011]
1.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page3of 5
’w
CM-110
V)
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: EDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al. CASENUMBERI
_DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JACK MELINE, et al. 127180
11. Insurance
a. this statement (name):
Insurance carrier. if any, for party ling
b. Reservation of rights: Yes No
c. Coverage issues will signicantly affect resolution of this case
(explain):
12. Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
Bankruptcy E Other (speciM:
Status:
13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a. I: There are companion. underlying, or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
(3) Case number:
(4) Status:
E Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
b. A motion to E consolidate coordinate will beled by (name party):
14. Bifurcation
The party or parties intend to lea motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type ofmotion, and reasons):
15. Other motions
E The party or parties expect tole the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
16. Discovery
a. E The party or parties have completed all discovery.
b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specied (describe all anticipated discovery):
Pam Description Date
Plaintiffs Written Discovery Feb. 2014
Plaintiffs Party/Witness Depositions March 2014
Plaintiffs Expert Discovery Per Code
c. E The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
anticipated (specify):
"is“ My 1' 20“]
Cit-11°
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pas“ °f5
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:EDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al. CASENUMBERI
et al. 12718 0
BEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JACK MELINE ,
17. Economic litigation
a. This is a limited civil case (i.e.. the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case.
b. and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
This is a limited civil case
discovery will be led (if checked,explain specically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or tn'al
should not apply to this case):
18. Other issues
The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify): The parties request that the partition process continue with
Judge Watkins and anticipate that the litigation will resolve without the
need for a trial.
19. Meet and confer
a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 ofthe California Rules
of Court (if not, explain):
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify):
20. Total number of pages attached (if any):
lam completely familiar with this case scove
and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of nd alternative dispute resolution,
as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter' e issues at the time of
the case management conference, including the written authority ofthe party where r
DatezJanuary 13, 2014
JODY M. BURGESS >
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) ( GNATU F‘ARTY OR ATTORNEY)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY 0R ATTORNEY)
Additional signatures are attached.
CM.1 1o [Rex]. July 1, 201 1]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of
5
Meline v. Meline [#5788]
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
PROOF OF SERVICE
I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Shasta County, California;
I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the Within action; my business
address is 2851 Park Marina Drive, Suite 300, Redding, California 96001; P.O. Drawer
994607, Redding, California 96099—4607; on this date I served:
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
xx MAIL: By placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with
postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States Post Ofce rnail box at
Redding, California, addressed as set forth below.
FAX: I personally sent to the addressee’s facsimile number indicated a true
copy of the above—described document(s).
Charleton S. Pearse John Jeffery Carter
LENAHAN, LEE, SLATER & PEARSE, LLP CARTER LAW OFFICE
1030 Fifteenth Street, Suite 300 y
P. O. Box 3606
Sacramento, CA 95814 Chico, CA 95927-3606
(91 e) 443-0869 (530) 342-61 95
Nels A. Christensen
CHRISTENSEN 8: SCHWARZ, LLP
1 Governors Lane
Chico, CA 95926
(530) 343-6454
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed January 9, 2014, at Redding, California.
.
MARY SIMONSEN
MAIREa BURGESS
2851 Park Marina Dr.
Suite 300
P.O. Drawer 994607
Reddlng. Californla
98099-4607 PROOF OF SERVICE
(530) 246-6050
Preview
~\/ ‘ R CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY - Jody M. Burgess, SBN 222061 Clinton M. Boren, SBN 263200 ‘x' MAIRE & BURGESS 2851 Park Marina Dr., Ste. 300 Redding, CA 96001 246-6050 .. TELEPHONENO.: (530) (530) FAXNo.(0pn‘onaI): 246—6060 E" jburgess@maire-law. com E-MAILADDRessmpriona/J: Couniv 01 Butte E Defs STEPHEN MELINE, IV, et al. ArrORNEYFORwame): SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA,COUNTY 0F BUTTE a L 1 3 23M , L STREETADDRESS: 655 Oleander Avenue JAM E MAILINGADDRESS:P.O. BOX 310 D erl‘ ’ ne Cley/ D CITYANDZIPCODE:ChiCO, California 95926 y 9- Y BRANCH NAME: Unlimited w pLAINTIFF/PETITIONERzEDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENTzJACK MELINE, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE ”UMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE (Amount demanded D LIMITED CASE 12 7 1 8 0 (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: January 21, 2014 Time: 8 : 30 a.m. Dept: tba Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): JODY M. BURGESS INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specied information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. b. D This statement is submitted by party (name):Stephen This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Meline , IV; Robert J . Meline; Nelda F. Jessee; and Melanie G. Edgington 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was led on (date): March 6, 2 002 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was led on (date): February 3, 2 003 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross—complaint have been served, have appeared. or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) E have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. E The following additional paIties may be added (specify names, nature ofinvolvement in they may be served): case, and date by which 4. Description ofcase a. Type ofcasein complaint cross-complaint (Describe,inc/uding causes ofaction): Partition action relative to ranch and rice lands Fonn Adopted for Mandatory Use Page1of5 ecu... organic... CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110[Rev. JuIy1,2011] (gal C?la.i“§$2%’f‘7“;‘d SObnS‘us a CM-11o PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:EDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al. CASENUMBER? 127180 —DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:JACK MELINE, et al. 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (lfpersona/ injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date ndicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date,and estimated future lostearnings. Ifequitable describe the nature of the relief.) relief is sought, The parties maintain an interest in separate properties known as the ranch land which has been actively partioned before the assigned Referee, Judge Watkins (Retired) . (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5. Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request a jury trial a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name ofeach pan‘y requesting a jury trial); 6. Trial date a. The trial has been set for (date): Sept . 8, 2014 b. 12 months of the date ofthe No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within ling of the complaint (if not, explain): c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): The parties currently have a date set in April of 2014 to establish the The Court has appointed Judge Noel Watkins (Ret.) as thc rcfcree for all purposes. on interlocutory judgmentthemannerof to partition follow. Discoveryhasbeen propoundedby all sides and experts are engaged and were previously disclosed as required under the California Civil Discovery Act. 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take {check one): a. days (specify number): 1O b. hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial in the caption by the attorney or party listed by the following: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e E~mail address: g. Party represented: Additional representation is described inAttachment 8. 9. Preference A This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (i) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has has not provided-the ADR information package identied in rule 3.221to theclient and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: PartyE has has not reviewed the ADR information package identied in rule3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). (1) This matter is subject to mandatoryjudicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. (2) inCode of Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specied Civil Procedure section 1141 .1 1. (3) This case of the California Rules of is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): CM-110 [Rev. Juiy Page 2 of5 1.2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: EDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al . CASE NUMBER; DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JACK MELINE, et al. 127180 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that app/y and provide the specied information): The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties'ADR processes (check all that apply): stipulation): Mediation session not yet scheduled (1) Mediation E Mediation session scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date); conference :1 Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): Settlement conference completed on (date): Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for ( date): (3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): I: Neutral evaluation completed on (date): Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial D E JudiCIal arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration D Agreed to completejudicial arbitration by (date): D Judicial arbitration completed on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private arbitration E E Private arbitration scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): E ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): (6) Other (specify): Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): CM-iio [Ravi Juiy 2011] 1. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page3of 5 ’w CM-110 V) PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: EDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al. CASENUMBERI _DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JACK MELINE, et al. 127180 11. Insurance a. this statement (name): Insurance carrier. if any, for party ling b. Reservation of rights: Yes No c. Coverage issues will signicantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. Bankruptcy E Other (speciM: Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. I: There are companion. underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: E Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. A motion to E consolidate coordinate will beled by (name party): 14. Bifurcation The party or parties intend to lea motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type ofmotion, and reasons): 15. Other motions E The party or parties expect tole the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): 16. Discovery a. E The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specied (describe all anticipated discovery): Pam Description Date Plaintiffs Written Discovery Feb. 2014 Plaintiffs Party/Witness Depositions March 2014 Plaintiffs Expert Discovery Per Code c. E The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): "is“ My 1' 20“] Cit-11° CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pas“ °f5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:EDWARD RICHARD MELINE, et al. CASENUMBERI et al. 12718 0 BEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JACK MELINE , 17. Economic litigation a. This is a limited civil case (i.e.. the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional This is a limited civil case discovery will be led (if checked,explain specically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or tn'al should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): The parties request that the partition process continue with Judge Watkins and anticipate that the litigation will resolve without the need for a trial. 19. Meet and confer a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 ofthe California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): lam completely familiar with this case scove and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of nd alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter' e issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority ofthe party where r DatezJanuary 13, 2014 JODY M. BURGESS > (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) ( GNATU F‘ARTY OR ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY 0R ATTORNEY) Additional signatures are attached. CM.1 1o [Rex]. July 1, 201 1] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5 Meline v. Meline [#5788] Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 PROOF OF SERVICE I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Shasta County, California; I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the Within action; my business address is 2851 Park Marina Drive, Suite 300, Redding, California 96001; P.O. Drawer 994607, Redding, California 96099—4607; on this date I served: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT xx MAIL: By placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States Post Ofce rnail box at Redding, California, addressed as set forth below. FAX: I personally sent to the addressee’s facsimile number indicated a true copy of the above—described document(s). Charleton S. Pearse John Jeffery Carter LENAHAN, LEE, SLATER & PEARSE, LLP CARTER LAW OFFICE 1030 Fifteenth Street, Suite 300 y P. O. Box 3606 Sacramento, CA 95814 Chico, CA 95927-3606 (91 e) 443-0869 (530) 342-61 95 Nels A. Christensen CHRISTENSEN 8: SCHWARZ, LLP 1 Governors Lane Chico, CA 95926 (530) 343-6454 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed January 9, 2014, at Redding, California. . MARY SIMONSEN MAIREa BURGESS 2851 Park Marina Dr. Suite 300 P.O. Drawer 994607 Reddlng. Californla 98099-4607 PROOF OF SERVICE (530) 246-6050