Preview
e ORIZINAL
CM-110
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nama, State Bor number. ond address). ‘FOR COURT USE ONLY
Charleton S. Pearse, SBN 122491
: Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP
1030 15th Street, Suite 300
Supt Court of Catto Fe
Sacramento, CA 95814
TELEPHONE NO.’ (916)443-1030 FAX NO. (Optiona
(9 16 )443-08
l): 69 F
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): !
ATTORNEY FOR (Name?: Ronald Rabo, Michael Rabo, Frederick Rabo, Mary Ann Schweiger, Susa L MAR 14 2013 L
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Butte E E
STREET ADDRESS: 655 Oleander Avenue
Ciek D
MAILING ADDRESS: 655 Oleander Avenue
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chico, 95926
BRANCH NAME: Chico Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): [J uNuimitep case (1 umitep case 127180
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less) File by Fax
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: March 29, 2013 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept.: c13 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):Charleton S. Pearse, Esq.
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. [_] This statement is submitted by party (name):
b. [8] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Ronald Rabo, Susan Miiler, Michael Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo
Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 27, 2006
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. CX) alt parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [J The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [£21 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [J have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [2] have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. [) The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type of case in [34] complaint Co cross-compiaint (Describe, including causes of action):
‘The complaint secks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property
Page tof
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
“SaenojRen daly Calitornia
4, 2014] ‘ules 3.720-3.730
www.courts.ca.gov
_ -
@ e
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. ‘CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
Jack
: Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180,
4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (/f personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount), estimated future medical expenses, lost
earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief )
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to
partition an additional parcel of real property.
(£1 (if more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request CI ajury tial [Ja Nonjury trial. (if more than one party, provide the name of each party
requesting a jury trial): Unknown at this time.
Trial date
a. [_] The trial has been set for (date):
b. [23] No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
not, explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a referee. ‘The parties are in agreement that all future hearings
should be conducted by the Referee and no trial date should be set in this case.
c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
See Attachment 6c.
Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
a OO days (specify number):29
b. [ ] hours (short causes) (specify):
Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption [) by the following:
a. Attorney:
b, Firm:
©. Address:
d. Telephone number: f. Fax number:
E-mail address:
o Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
g. Party represented:
Preference
{-] This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
a ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the
court and community programs in this case.
(1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel (Xd has [7] has not provided the ADR information package identified
in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client.
(2) For self-represented parties: Party [J has £1
has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221.
b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
1) C9 This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
Statutory limit.
@) C4 Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
Civil Procedure section 1141.11.
3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption):
‘CM-110 Rev. July 1, 2011) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page
2 of 6
@ @ CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. [CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or
have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information):
The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to
this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties‘ ADR
processes (check alf that apply): stipulation):
mM Mediation session not yet scheduled
(1) Mediation Co Cc Mediation session scheduled for (date):
CI Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
Mediation completed on (date):
Settlement conference not yet scheduled
(2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date):
conference
Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
Settlement conference completed on (date):
Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date):
(3) Neutral evaluation
Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
(4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration
Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date):
Judicial arbitration completed on (date):
Private arbitration not yet scheduled
(5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration
Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
Private arbitration completed on (date):
ADR session not yet scheduled
ADR session scheduled for (date):
(6) Other (specify):
1600.5(a) Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
ADR completed on (date):
‘CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] Page
3 ofS
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
@ e CM-110,
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
11. Insurance
a. [(] Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
b. Reservation of rights: C7] Yes No
¢. [©] Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
12. Jurisdiction
indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
(J) Bankruptcy [7] other (specify):
Status:
13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a. [[5] There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
(3) Case number:
(4) Status:
[) Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
b, [7] Amotion to (=) consolidate [J coordinate will be filed by (name party):
14. Bifurcation
[7] The Party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
15. Other motions
CX] The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
Unknown at this time.
16. Discovery
a. [_] The party or parties have completed all discovery
b. [XX] The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
Party Description Date
The Court has appointed a referee in this matter. Itis anticiptated that the referee will set discovery and resolve any
discovery disputes.
c. [_] The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
anticipated (specify):
(CM-110 [Rev. July
1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page
4 of §
e ®
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER:
|
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
17. Economic litigation
a. [_] This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case.
b. [_] This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why'economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
should not apply to this case):
18. Other issues
E The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify):
Judge Noe! Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter. As requested by the Court, these Rabo parties agree that in exchange for mutual waiver
of costs and fees the 2 related cases may be dismissed without prejudice.
:
19. Meet and confer
a. [J The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
of Court (if not, explain):
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify):
20. Total number of pages attached (if any): 4
|am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution,
as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of
the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
Date: March 14, 2013
Charleton S. Pearse, Esq.
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
>
(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
[_)) Additional signatures are attached.
(CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2014] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page Sof
e @
ATTACHMENT 6.c
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Ja feline, et al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
03/21/13: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
Beaudine Hill, et al. v. Carlen Trai ort, Inc., et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00035178
04/10/13 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
City of Folsom v. Tara Rae Skinner-Plunkett, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00095363
04/15/13: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Beaudine Hill, et al. v. Carlen Transport, Inc.. et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00035178
04/16/13 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59
Gerald Giel v. David Craig, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00096282
04/19/13: CIVIL TRIAL CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. TBA
Linda Moulton v. Jason Lenabur; et al.
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: S-CV-0030776
04/29/13 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59
Kenneth Oosting v. Allstar Fire Equipment, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00088656
04/30/13 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Ghulam Rasoli v. Jose Sacramento Duran Yanez, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-0086992
05/06/13: TRIAL (5 days) @ Time: TBA, Dept. TBA
Linda Moulton v. Jason Lenaburg. et al.
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: S-CV-0030776
05/20/13; FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Ctrm. 10
Diana Williams v. Pamela Miller, et al.
USS. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:11-cv-01844-GEB-DAD
05/20/13 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Tatrice Speaks, et al. v. Samuel Lee Johnson, Jr., et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00107362
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page f of4
e e
05/24/13 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. 15
Rodni andier v. Ci of West Sacramento, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-199
05/31/13: TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 15
Kristopher Miller, et al. v. Frank Anthony Freeno, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM10-2510
06/03/13; TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Gerald Giel v. David Craig, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00096282
06/03/13: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
enneth Oosting v. Allstar Fire Equipment, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00088656
06/10/13: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
City of Folsom v. Tara Rae Skinner-Plunkett, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00095363
07/01/13: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59
Sparta Insurance Co. V. Nickell Mosely, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00113409
07/01/13. TRIAL (14 days) @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. 15
Kristopher Miller, et al. v. Frank Anthony Freeno, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM10-2510
07/08/13 TRIAL (7 days) @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. 15
Rodney Chandler v. City of West Sacramento, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-199
TAA ISSUES CONFERENCE @ 3:00 p.m. Dept. 31
Dennis Almond, et al. v. Armand Abaya, et al.
Contra Costa Superior Court Case No.: CIV MSC10-03553
71223 TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 31
Dennis Almond, et al. v. Armand Abaya, et al.
Contra Costa Superior Court Case No.: CIV MSC10-03553
07/30/13; MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
Barton Healthcare vy. CALSTAR, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00083404
08/01/13: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 19
Ben Hakala, et al. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company. et al.
Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-248835
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of4
e @
08/06/13; TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
SI a ta Insurance Co. V. Nickell Mosel: etal I :
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2011-00113409
08/27/13: TRIAL (14 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Ctrm. 10
Diana Williams v. Pamela Miller, et al.
US. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:1 1-cv-01844-GEB-DAD
08/30/13: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 10
Sheila Leard, et al. v. City of Davis, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: P011-1319
09/06/13 TRIAL (14 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 19
Ben Hakala, et al. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, et al.
Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-248835
09/16/13; TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Barton Healthcare v. CALSTAR, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00083404
10/11/13 TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 15
Sheila Leard, et al. v. City of Davis, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO11-1319
11/04/13. TRIAL (14 days) @ 08:30 a.m., Dept. 15
Sheila Leard, et al. v. City of Davis, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO11-1319
11/22/13. MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 10
Karen Davis v. Yolo County, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO12-1797
01/10/14 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 15
Lianna Gliksman v. City of Davis, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-1372
OL/31/14: TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 14
Karen Davis v. Yolo County. et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO12-1797
02/21/14: TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 15
Lianna Gliksman v. City of Davis, et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-1372
02/24/14: TRIAL (7 days) @ 08:30 a.m., Dept. 15
Karen Davis v. Yolo County. et al.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO12-1797
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 3 of 4
e
03/10/14: TRIAL (7 days) @ 09:00 a.m., Dept. 15
ianna Gliksman v. Cit f Davi: etal.
Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-1372
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 4 of 4
® ®
Edward Richard Meline, et al. v, Jack Meline, et al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed
in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is
1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily
practice of the law offices of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service.
On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following
parties:
10
Richard L. Crabtree James B. Berglund.
11 Attorney at Law Attorney at Law
1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 2445 Oro Dam Blvd., E., Suite 2
12 Chico, CA 95973 Oroville, CA 95966
Facsimile: (530) 566-9203
13
John Jeffrey Carter Jody M. Burgess, Esq.
14 Attorney at Law Maire & Burgess
P.O. Box 3606 P.O. Drawer 994607
15 Chico, CA 95927 Redding, CA 96099-4607
Facsimile: (530) 342-6195 Facsimile: (530) 846-6060
16
17
(BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for first-class.
18 mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action.
19 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s)
noted above.
20
(BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile to the telephone!
21 number(s) hereafter.
22 (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy of the within document(s) in a
sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail.
23
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
24
true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on March 14, 2013 in Sacramento, California.
25
26 SS
DUS JAME!
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
Preview
e ORIZINAL CM-110 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nama, State Bor number. ond address). ‘FOR COURT USE ONLY Charleton S. Pearse, SBN 122491 : Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP 1030 15th Street, Suite 300 Supt Court of Catto Fe Sacramento, CA 95814 TELEPHONE NO.’ (916)443-1030 FAX NO. (Optiona (9 16 )443-08 l): 69 F E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ! ATTORNEY FOR (Name?: Ronald Rabo, Michael Rabo, Frederick Rabo, Mary Ann Schweiger, Susa L MAR 14 2013 L SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Butte E E STREET ADDRESS: 655 Oleander Avenue Ciek D MAILING ADDRESS: 655 Oleander Avenue CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chico, 95926 BRANCH NAME: Chico Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): [J uNuimitep case (1 umitep case 127180 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) File by Fax A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: March 29, 2013 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept.: c13 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):Charleton S. Pearse, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. [_] This statement is submitted by party (name): b. [8] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Ronald Rabo, Susan Miiler, Michael Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 27, 2006 Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. CX) alt parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [J The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [£21 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) [J have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [2] have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. [) The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in [34] complaint Co cross-compiaint (Describe, including causes of action): ‘The complaint secks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property Page tof Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, “SaenojRen daly Calitornia 4, 2014] ‘ules 3.720-3.730 www.courts.ca.gov _ - @ e CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. ‘CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Jack : Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180, 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (/f personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount), estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief ) The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property. (£1 (if more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request CI ajury tial [Ja Nonjury trial. (if more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): Unknown at this time. Trial date a. [_] The trial has been set for (date): b. [23] No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a referee. ‘The parties are in agreement that all future hearings should be conducted by the Referee and no trial date should be set in this case. c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): See Attachment 6c. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a OO days (specify number):29 b. [ ] hours (short causes) (specify): Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption [) by the following: a. Attorney: b, Firm: ©. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: E-mail address: o Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. g. Party represented: Preference {-] This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel (Xd has [7] has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: Party [J has £1 has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). 1) C9 This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the Statutory limit. @) C4 Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. 3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): ‘CM-110 Rev. July 1, 2011) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 6 @ @ CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. [CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties‘ ADR processes (check alf that apply): stipulation): mM Mediation session not yet scheduled (1) Mediation Co Cc Mediation session scheduled for (date): CI Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): Settlement conference completed on (date): Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): (3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): (6) Other (specify): 1600.5(a) Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): ‘CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] Page 3 ofS CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT @ e CM-110, PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 11. Insurance a. [(] Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: C7] Yes No ¢. [©] Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. (J) Bankruptcy [7] other (specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. [[5] There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: [) Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b, [7] Amotion to (=) consolidate [J coordinate will be filed by (name party): 14. Bifurcation [7] The Party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions CX] The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): Unknown at this time. 16. Discovery a. [_] The party or parties have completed all discovery b. [XX] The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date The Court has appointed a referee in this matter. Itis anticiptated that the referee will set discovery and resolve any discovery disputes. c. [_] The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): (CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4 of § e ® CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER: | DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 17. Economic litigation a. [_] This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. [_] This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why'economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues E The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): Judge Noe! Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter. As requested by the Court, these Rabo parties agree that in exchange for mutual waiver of costs and fees the 2 related cases may be dismissed without prejudice. : 19. Meet and confer a. [J The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): 4 |am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: March 14, 2013 Charleton S. Pearse, Esq. (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) > (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) [_)) Additional signatures are attached. (CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2014] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page Sof e @ ATTACHMENT 6.c CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Ja feline, et al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 03/21/13: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 Beaudine Hill, et al. v. Carlen Trai ort, Inc., et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00035178 04/10/13 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 City of Folsom v. Tara Rae Skinner-Plunkett, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00095363 04/15/13: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Beaudine Hill, et al. v. Carlen Transport, Inc.. et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00035178 04/16/13 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59 Gerald Giel v. David Craig, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00096282 04/19/13: CIVIL TRIAL CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. TBA Linda Moulton v. Jason Lenabur; et al. Placer County Superior Court Case No.: S-CV-0030776 04/29/13 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59 Kenneth Oosting v. Allstar Fire Equipment, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00088656 04/30/13 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Ghulam Rasoli v. Jose Sacramento Duran Yanez, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-0086992 05/06/13: TRIAL (5 days) @ Time: TBA, Dept. TBA Linda Moulton v. Jason Lenaburg. et al. Placer County Superior Court Case No.: S-CV-0030776 05/20/13; FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Ctrm. 10 Diana Williams v. Pamela Miller, et al. USS. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:11-cv-01844-GEB-DAD 05/20/13 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Tatrice Speaks, et al. v. Samuel Lee Johnson, Jr., et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00107362 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page f of4 e e 05/24/13 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. 15 Rodni andier v. Ci of West Sacramento, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-199 05/31/13: TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 15 Kristopher Miller, et al. v. Frank Anthony Freeno, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM10-2510 06/03/13; TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Gerald Giel v. David Craig, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00096282 06/03/13: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 enneth Oosting v. Allstar Fire Equipment, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00088656 06/10/13: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 City of Folsom v. Tara Rae Skinner-Plunkett, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00095363 07/01/13: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59 Sparta Insurance Co. V. Nickell Mosely, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-201 1-00113409 07/01/13. TRIAL (14 days) @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. 15 Kristopher Miller, et al. v. Frank Anthony Freeno, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM10-2510 07/08/13 TRIAL (7 days) @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. 15 Rodney Chandler v. City of West Sacramento, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-199 TAA ISSUES CONFERENCE @ 3:00 p.m. Dept. 31 Dennis Almond, et al. v. Armand Abaya, et al. Contra Costa Superior Court Case No.: CIV MSC10-03553 71223 TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 31 Dennis Almond, et al. v. Armand Abaya, et al. Contra Costa Superior Court Case No.: CIV MSC10-03553 07/30/13; MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 Barton Healthcare vy. CALSTAR, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00083404 08/01/13: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 19 Ben Hakala, et al. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company. et al. Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-248835 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of4 e @ 08/06/13; TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 SI a ta Insurance Co. V. Nickell Mosel: etal I : Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2011-00113409 08/27/13: TRIAL (14 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Ctrm. 10 Diana Williams v. Pamela Miller, et al. US. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:1 1-cv-01844-GEB-DAD 08/30/13: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 10 Sheila Leard, et al. v. City of Davis, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: P011-1319 09/06/13 TRIAL (14 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 19 Ben Hakala, et al. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, et al. Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-248835 09/16/13; TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Barton Healthcare v. CALSTAR, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00083404 10/11/13 TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 15 Sheila Leard, et al. v. City of Davis, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO11-1319 11/04/13. TRIAL (14 days) @ 08:30 a.m., Dept. 15 Sheila Leard, et al. v. City of Davis, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO11-1319 11/22/13. MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 10 Karen Davis v. Yolo County, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO12-1797 01/10/14 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 15 Lianna Gliksman v. City of Davis, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-1372 OL/31/14: TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 14 Karen Davis v. Yolo County. et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO12-1797 02/21/14: TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 15 Lianna Gliksman v. City of Davis, et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-1372 02/24/14: TRIAL (7 days) @ 08:30 a.m., Dept. 15 Karen Davis v. Yolo County. et al. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PO12-1797 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 3 of 4 e 03/10/14: TRIAL (7 days) @ 09:00 a.m., Dept. 15 ianna Gliksman v. Cit f Davi: etal. Yolo County Superior Court Case No.: PM12-1372 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 4 of 4 ® ® Edward Richard Meline, et al. v, Jack Meline, et al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily practice of the law offices of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following parties: 10 Richard L. Crabtree James B. Berglund. 11 Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 2445 Oro Dam Blvd., E., Suite 2 12 Chico, CA 95973 Oroville, CA 95966 Facsimile: (530) 566-9203 13 John Jeffrey Carter Jody M. Burgess, Esq. 14 Attorney at Law Maire & Burgess P.O. Box 3606 P.O. Drawer 994607 15 Chico, CA 95927 Redding, CA 96099-4607 Facsimile: (530) 342-6195 Facsimile: (530) 846-6060 16 17 (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for first-class. 18 mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action. 19 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s) noted above. 20 (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile to the telephone! 21 number(s) hereafter. 22 (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy of the within document(s) in a sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail. 23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 24 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on March 14, 2013 in Sacramento, California. 25 26 SS DUS JAME! 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE