Preview
é5. *
@
ATTORNEY GH PARTY VATIICUT ATTORNE Tannen, State far muasten, oo aueeas)
@ORIGINA FOR COURT USE ONY
L
CM-110
Chysfetom S. Pearse, SN YL
Lentshan.tee, Slater & P. se LLP
HM ISU Stucel, Saite 3a
Seen eng, CA SSS
AEEEPUONENO yy tej 3-130 FAK IED COM FEL S-ORD F Superior Court of Californi I F
EAA ANDRESS; Creer j County of Butte
i
ATICANEY FOR sWerir® Runald Rabu. Mivhael Rabo, Frederick Rabo, Mary Anu Scloweiver, Susapi \
whe SEP 04 2011 L
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF finde E
STREET ADDRESS. 685 Oleander Avene D SOR ner, Clerk DD”
MAS ING ADDRESS 655 Okwunder Avene iputy
CU AND 7H GODE | Chico, 95 Ms
DRANCH Neat Chico Cousthinse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline. et al.
OEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline. et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER,
(Check one}: (*) unumtep case L] unten case 12718
(Amount demanded {Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less}
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: septemer In. 2011 TiMe! 10:30 a.m, Dept:15 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if difforent from the address above):
[2X] Notice of Intent to Appearby Telephone, by (name):Charletan S. Pearse, Esq.
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties farswer ore):
a. [_] This statement is submitted by party (name):
BY FAX
b. LX] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Roaatd Rabe, Susan Milter. Michael Raho, Mary Ans Rabo Sebweiser and Frederick Rabo
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainanis only)
a The complaint was filed on (date).
b. (3€] The cross-complaint, ifany, was filed on (date): Deemer 27, 2496
Service {fo be answered by plainiiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. CX) an parties named In the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b: [The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
2) [) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [77] have had a default entered against them (specify names):
« [9 The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of inwolvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type ofcasein [(X] complaint mo ctoss-complaint (Describe, including causes of action}:
Vite complaint seeks partion of the teal property and an ingunction, ‘The cross-comyplaint socks to partition an additinnal parcel uf real properly.
Page tats
rem Adaprod tor Bandatery Wee CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal Rules of Cost
Jugal Council2f Calferna mos 3720-3 730
CH= 10[fee. July?, 201} wow. courts 63 90
e@ @ ‘CASE NUMBER:
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al.
27180
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.
4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
eamings to date, and estimated future lost eamings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.)
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to
partition an additional parcel of real property.
[1 (if more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request C3 ajury trial (7) a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party
requesting a jury trial): Unknown at this time.
Trial date
a. [(_] The trial has been set for (date):
b. [] No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
not, explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a referce.
c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
See Attachment 6c.
Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
a BO days (specify number):79
b. [J hours (short causes) (specify):
Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial [3X] by the attorney or party listed in the caption 1] by the foltowing:
a. Attorney:
b. Firm:
c. Address:
d. Telephone number: f. Fax number:
e. E-mail address: g. Party represented:
{£1 Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
Preference
[1 This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the
court and community programs in this case.
(1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel CX1 has C71 has not provided the ADR information package identified
in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client.
(2) For self-represented parties: Party [9 has (J has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221
b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
MC) This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.14 or to civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
statutory limit.
@C4 Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
Civil Procedure section 1141.11.
@CI This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the Califomia Rules of Courtor from civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption):
‘CM-170 (Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page
2 of 5
i
é .
@ e CM-110
|
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. SASE NUMBER:
EFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180.
10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or
have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information):
The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to
this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties‘ ADR
processes (check all that apply): | stipulation):
Ci Mediation session not yet scheduled
(1) Mediation CI CI Mediation session scheduled for (date):
CI Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
CI Mediation completed on (date):
Cl Settlement conference not yet scheduled
(2) Settlement Co Settlement conference scheduled for (date):
conference
Cl Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
CI Settlement conference completed on (date):
Cl Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
Cl Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date):
(3) Neutral evaluation
CI Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
CI Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
CI Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
(4) Nonbinding judicial CI Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration
CI Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date):
Judicial arbitration completed on (date):
Private arbitration not yet scheduled
(5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
Private arbitration completed on (date):
ADR session not yet scheduled
ADR session scheduled for (date):
(6) Other (specify):
1600.5(a) Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
ADR completed on (date):
‘CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011) Page
3 of 5
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
_ _
@ e CASE NUMBER:
CM-410,
L
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
Edward Richard Meline, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
11. Insurance
a. [] Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
b. Reservation of rights: [—_] Yes CJ No
c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
12. Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
(1 Bankruptey 77] other (specify):
Status:
13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a. [(_] There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
(3) Case number:
(4) Status:
[) Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
b. £7] A mation to [J consolidate [=] coordinate will be filed by (name party):
14, Bifurcation
(J The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
15. Other motions
([X] The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
‘Unknown at this time.
16. Discovery
a. [__] The party or parties have completed all discovery.
b. [X] The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
Party Descriptio Date
‘The Court has appointed a referee in this matter. It is anticiptated that the referee will set discovery and resolve any
discovery disputes.
c. [_] The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
anticipated (specify):
‘CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 20175 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page
4 of §
@ e CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER’
|
127180
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.
17. Economic litigation
a. [] This is a timited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case.
b. [_] This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
should not apply to this case):
18. Other issues
(3 The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify):
Judge Noel Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter.
19, Meet and confer
a. (_] The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
of Court (if not, explain):
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify):
20. Total number of pages attached (if any):
| am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution,
as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of
the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
Date: september 1, 2011
Charleton §. Pearse, Esq.
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
pom, C2
<“IENATUREDRPARTY OR ATTORNEY)
Fon
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
» (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
[) Additional signatures are attached.
(CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page Sof 5
e @
ATTACHMENT 6.¢
. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack Meline, et al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
09/16/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. TBA
Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV22800
09/23/11: CIVIL TRIAL CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 42
Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV22800
09/29/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59
Thomas Harris, I] , v. Joseph Urbon, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00068759
10/03/11: TRIAL (14 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. TBA
Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV22800
10/13/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
ohn Panenk: tal. v. Linda Lee Crockett, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00062060
10/17/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. 23
Jennifer Sol v. Aaron Robert Keller, et al
Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No.: 658574
1/01/11: TRIAL (5 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Thomas Harris, I. v. Joseph Urbon, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00068759
1MV/ON/11: TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:30 a.m., Dept. 23
Jennifer Sol v. Aaron Robert Keller, et al
Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No.: 658574
11/02/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
Kathryn M. Nemes, et al. v. Jaar Sales, Inc., et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00086084
1V21/11: TRIAL (5 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
John Panenka, et al. v. Linda Lee Crockett, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00062060
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page I of 3
2
® e
12/12/11 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Kathryn M. Nemes, et al. v. Jaar Sales, Inc.. et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00086084
12AS/L MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
Beaudine Hill, et al. v. Carlen Transport, Inc., et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00035178
12/20/11 ISSUES CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 33
Unisys, Inc., et al._v. Hoffman Enclosures, Inc., et al.
Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No.: CIVMSC08-01725
01/09/12 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. TBA
County of Nevada v. William Frank Gregg, et al.
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 77122
01/09/12: TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:05 a.m., Dept. 33
Unisys. Inc., et al._v. Hoffman Enclosures, Inc., et al
Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No.: CIVMSC08-01725
01/12/12: FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 2:00 p.m., Dept. 3
Leslie Ann Chissie v. WinCo Foods, LLC. et al.
U.S. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:09-cv-02915-MCE-KJM
OL/I7/12:; TRIAL (5 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. TBA
Beaudine ill, et al. v. Carlen Transport, Inc., et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00035178
01/27/12: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. TBA
County of Nevada v. William Frank Gregg, et al.
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 77122
02/07/12: TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. TBA
County of Nevada v. William Frank Gregg, et al
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 77122
02/24/12 TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 510
Charles Aitken, et al. v. City of Berkeley, et al.
Alameda County Superior Court Case No.: RG07316022
03/05/12 TRIAL (10 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 3
Leslie Ann Chissie v. WinCo Foods, LLC. et al.
USS. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:09-cv-02915-MCE-KJM
05/23/12; MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Conf. Rm. 575
Dermot Shiels, et al. v. EastGroup Properties, L.P., et al.
Fresno County Superior Court Case No.: 10CECG04328
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of 3
e ®
06/15/12 TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 9:30 a.m., Dept. 503
Dermot iels, et al. v. EastGre P ies, L.P., et al.
Fresno County Superior Court Case No.: 10CECG04328
06/18/12: TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 503
Dermot Shiels, et al. v. EastGro' Properties, L.P., et al.
Fresno County Superior Court Case No.: 10CECG04328
08/20/12: FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 2:00 p.m., Dept. 5
C of Sacramento v. Turbomeca. S.; . et al.
US. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-KJN
10/16/12. TRIAL (14 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 5
C inty of Sacramento v. Turbomeca. .p.A., et al.
USS. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-KJN
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 3 of 3
© 6
Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack line, et al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed
in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is
1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily
practice of the law offices of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service.
On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following
parties:
10
Nels A. Christensen James B. Berglund William A. Ward
11 Christensen & Schwartz, LLP Attorney at Law Attorney at Law
1 Governors Lane 1838 Feather River Blvd. 9 Williamsburg Lane
12 Chico, CA 95926 Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926
Facsimile:(530) 343-6454 Facsimile: (530) 532-1002 Facsimile: (530) 342-7920
13
Richard L. Crabtree John Jeffrey Carter Nelda F. Jessee
14 Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 1272 Hobart Street
1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 P.O. Box 3606 Chico, CA 95926
15 Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95927
Facsimile: (530) 566-9203 Facsimile: (530) 342-6195 Melanie G. Edgington
16 P.O. Box 119
Robert Meline Stephen Meline IV Alvadore, OR 97409-0119
17 P.O. Box 273 P.O. Box 273
Chico, CA 95927 Chico, CA 95927
18
19 X (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for first-class
mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action.
20
(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s)
21 noted above.
22 (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile to the telephone
number(s) hereafter.
23
(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy of the within document(s) ina
24 sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail.
25 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
26 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on September 1, 2011 in Sacramento, California.
27
28 DUST’
PROOF OF SERVICE
Preview
é5. * @ ATTORNEY GH PARTY VATIICUT ATTORNE Tannen, State far muasten, oo aueeas) @ORIGINA FOR COURT USE ONY L CM-110 Chysfetom S. Pearse, SN YL Lentshan.tee, Slater & P. se LLP HM ISU Stucel, Saite 3a Seen eng, CA SSS AEEEPUONENO yy tej 3-130 FAK IED COM FEL S-ORD F Superior Court of Californi I F EAA ANDRESS; Creer j County of Butte i ATICANEY FOR sWerir® Runald Rabu. Mivhael Rabo, Frederick Rabo, Mary Anu Scloweiver, Susapi \ whe SEP 04 2011 L SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF finde E STREET ADDRESS. 685 Oleander Avene D SOR ner, Clerk DD” MAS ING ADDRESS 655 Okwunder Avene iputy CU AND 7H GODE | Chico, 95 Ms DRANCH Neat Chico Cousthinse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline. et al. OEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline. et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER, (Check one}: (*) unumtep case L] unten case 12718 (Amount demanded {Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less} A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: septemer In. 2011 TiMe! 10:30 a.m, Dept:15 Div.: Room: Address of court (if difforent from the address above): [2X] Notice of Intent to Appearby Telephone, by (name):Charletan S. Pearse, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties farswer ore): a. [_] This statement is submitted by party (name): BY FAX b. LX] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Roaatd Rabe, Susan Milter. Michael Raho, Mary Ans Rabo Sebweiser and Frederick Rabo Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainanis only) a The complaint was filed on (date). b. (3€] The cross-complaint, ifany, was filed on (date): Deemer 27, 2496 Service {fo be answered by plainiiffs and cross-complainants only) a. CX) an parties named In the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b: [The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): 2) [) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [77] have had a default entered against them (specify names): « [9 The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of inwolvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type ofcasein [(X] complaint mo ctoss-complaint (Describe, including causes of action}: Vite complaint seeks partion of the teal property and an ingunction, ‘The cross-comyplaint socks to partition an additinnal parcel uf real properly. Page tats rem Adaprod tor Bandatery Wee CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal Rules of Cost Jugal Council2f Calferna mos 3720-3 730 CH= 10[fee. July?, 201} wow. courts 63 90 e@ @ ‘CASE NUMBER: CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. 27180 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost eamings to date, and estimated future lost eamings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property. [1 (if more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request C3 ajury trial (7) a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): Unknown at this time. Trial date a. [(_] The trial has been set for (date): b. [] No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a referce. c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): See Attachment 6c. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a BO days (specify number):79 b. [J hours (short causes) (specify): Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial [3X] by the attorney or party listed in the caption 1] by the foltowing: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented: {£1 Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. Preference [1 This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel CX1 has C71 has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: Party [9 has (J has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). MC) This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.14 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. @C4 Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. @CI This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the Califomia Rules of Courtor from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): ‘CM-170 (Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 5 i é . @ e CM-110 | PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. SASE NUMBER: EFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180. 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties‘ ADR processes (check all that apply): | stipulation): Ci Mediation session not yet scheduled (1) Mediation CI CI Mediation session scheduled for (date): CI Agreed to complete mediation by (date): CI Mediation completed on (date): Cl Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Co Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference Cl Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): CI Settlement conference completed on (date): Cl Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Cl Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): (3) Neutral evaluation CI Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): CI Neutral evaluation completed on (date): CI Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial CI Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration CI Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): (6) Other (specify): 1600.5(a) Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): ‘CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011) Page 3 of 5 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT _ _ @ e CASE NUMBER: CM-410, L PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 11. Insurance a. [] Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: [—_] Yes CJ No c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. (1 Bankruptey 77] other (specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. [(_] There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: [) Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. £7] A mation to [J consolidate [=] coordinate will be filed by (name party): 14, Bifurcation (J The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions ([X] The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): ‘Unknown at this time. 16. Discovery a. [__] The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. [X] The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Descriptio Date ‘The Court has appointed a referee in this matter. It is anticiptated that the referee will set discovery and resolve any discovery disputes. c. [_] The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): ‘CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 20175 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4 of § @ e CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER’ | 127180 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 17. Economic litigation a. [] This is a timited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. [_] This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues (3 The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): Judge Noel Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter. 19, Meet and confer a. (_] The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): | am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: september 1, 2011 Charleton §. Pearse, Esq. (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) pom, C2 <“IENATUREDRPARTY OR ATTORNEY) Fon (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) » (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) [) Additional signatures are attached. (CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page Sof 5 e @ ATTACHMENT 6.¢ . CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack Meline, et al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 09/16/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. TBA Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV22800 09/23/11: CIVIL TRIAL CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 42 Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV22800 09/29/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59 Thomas Harris, I] , v. Joseph Urbon, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00068759 10/03/11: TRIAL (14 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. TBA Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV22800 10/13/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 ohn Panenk: tal. v. Linda Lee Crockett, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00062060 10/17/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. 23 Jennifer Sol v. Aaron Robert Keller, et al Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No.: 658574 1/01/11: TRIAL (5 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Thomas Harris, I. v. Joseph Urbon, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00068759 1MV/ON/11: TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:30 a.m., Dept. 23 Jennifer Sol v. Aaron Robert Keller, et al Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No.: 658574 11/02/11: MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 Kathryn M. Nemes, et al. v. Jaar Sales, Inc., et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00086084 1V21/11: TRIAL (5 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 John Panenka, et al. v. Linda Lee Crockett, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00062060 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page I of 3 2 ® e 12/12/11 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Kathryn M. Nemes, et al. v. Jaar Sales, Inc.. et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2010-00086084 12AS/L MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 Beaudine Hill, et al. v. Carlen Transport, Inc., et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00035178 12/20/11 ISSUES CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 33 Unisys, Inc., et al._v. Hoffman Enclosures, Inc., et al. Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No.: CIVMSC08-01725 01/09/12 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. TBA County of Nevada v. William Frank Gregg, et al. Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 77122 01/09/12: TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:05 a.m., Dept. 33 Unisys. Inc., et al._v. Hoffman Enclosures, Inc., et al Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No.: CIVMSC08-01725 01/12/12: FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 2:00 p.m., Dept. 3 Leslie Ann Chissie v. WinCo Foods, LLC. et al. U.S. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:09-cv-02915-MCE-KJM OL/I7/12:; TRIAL (5 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. TBA Beaudine ill, et al. v. Carlen Transport, Inc., et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-00035178 01/27/12: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. TBA County of Nevada v. William Frank Gregg, et al. Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 77122 02/07/12: TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. TBA County of Nevada v. William Frank Gregg, et al Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 77122 02/24/12 TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 510 Charles Aitken, et al. v. City of Berkeley, et al. Alameda County Superior Court Case No.: RG07316022 03/05/12 TRIAL (10 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 3 Leslie Ann Chissie v. WinCo Foods, LLC. et al. USS. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:09-cv-02915-MCE-KJM 05/23/12; MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Conf. Rm. 575 Dermot Shiels, et al. v. EastGroup Properties, L.P., et al. Fresno County Superior Court Case No.: 10CECG04328 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of 3 e ® 06/15/12 TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 9:30 a.m., Dept. 503 Dermot iels, et al. v. EastGre P ies, L.P., et al. Fresno County Superior Court Case No.: 10CECG04328 06/18/12: TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 503 Dermot Shiels, et al. v. EastGro' Properties, L.P., et al. Fresno County Superior Court Case No.: 10CECG04328 08/20/12: FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 2:00 p.m., Dept. 5 C of Sacramento v. Turbomeca. S.; . et al. US. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-KJN 10/16/12. TRIAL (14 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 5 C inty of Sacramento v. Turbomeca. .p.A., et al. USS. District Court Eastern District of California Case No.: 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-KJN ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 3 of 3 © 6 Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack line, et al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily practice of the law offices of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following parties: 10 Nels A. Christensen James B. Berglund William A. Ward 11 Christensen & Schwartz, LLP Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 1 Governors Lane 1838 Feather River Blvd. 9 Williamsburg Lane 12 Chico, CA 95926 Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926 Facsimile:(530) 343-6454 Facsimile: (530) 532-1002 Facsimile: (530) 342-7920 13 Richard L. Crabtree John Jeffrey Carter Nelda F. Jessee 14 Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 1272 Hobart Street 1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 P.O. Box 3606 Chico, CA 95926 15 Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95927 Facsimile: (530) 566-9203 Facsimile: (530) 342-6195 Melanie G. Edgington 16 P.O. Box 119 Robert Meline Stephen Meline IV Alvadore, OR 97409-0119 17 P.O. Box 273 P.O. Box 273 Chico, CA 95927 Chico, CA 95927 18 19 X (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for first-class mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action. 20 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s) 21 noted above. 22 (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile to the telephone number(s) hereafter. 23 (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy of the within document(s) ina 24 sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail. 25 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 26 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on September 1, 2011 in Sacramento, California. 27 28 DUST’ PROOF OF SERVICE