Preview
~
CM-110
:1 _NT_0RNEY OR PAR‘IY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, S!‘
_I number. and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
.J
—
'térleton S. Pearse, SBN 122491
eana B. Pipkin, SBN 208915
Slater LLP
_
" Lenahan, Lee, & Pearse,
1030 15th Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
TELEPHONENO; (91 6) 4 43—1030 FAXNo (91 6)
(Optional). 4 4 3-08 69
g“: SuperiorCourt of California
EWmAmmasmmmw:Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger, Frederick Rabo, Cnuntv of Bufte
g:
mmmmvmnmmw.Rona1d Rabo, Michael Rabo, Susan Miller B
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Butte L E
E
.
STREETADDRESSS655 Oleander Avenue my 2a 20m
é
MNLING ADDRESS 655 Oleander
Chico ,
CITY AND zip CODE: CA
Avenue
9 5 92 6
D Kim“ 1vria er,Clark 5
By
BRANCH NAME Deputy
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONERzEdward Richard Meline, et al.
Meline and Sharon et a1.
arty/6‘56
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENTzJack Meline,
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER'
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE [:3 LIMITED CASE 12 7 1 8 O
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25.000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: December 10, 2010 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept; CO9 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
D Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specied information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. E This statement is submitted by party (name):
/
Susan Mlller, Michael
.
_X
.
b. Thisslatementissubmittedjointlybyparties (names):Ronald Rabo,
Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was led on (date): r
b. _X The cross-complaint, if any. was led on (date): December 27 , 2O06
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. X All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been sewed. or have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [:3 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. _ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which
they may be served): :
4. Description of case
a. Type ofcasein complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The
cross—complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property.
Page1of 4
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules otCourt.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
~
Judicial Council of California a1 3720-3730
rules
CM-1 10 [Rev. January 1. 2009]
-
Sofuetg ns
%Pus
BY FAX
CM-110
.3
‘PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:Edward ruchard Meline, et al. CASENUMBER‘
127180
LDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et
al.
4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case,including any damages] (/fpersonal injmy damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date ndicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
eamings to date, and estimated future lost eamings. describe the nature of the relief)
If equitable relief is sought,
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an inj unction; The
cross—complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property .
(If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b‘)
5. Jury or nonjury trial w
The party or parties request a jury trialE a nonjury trial. (/f more than one party, provide the name of each party
Unknown
requesting ajury tn’al): at this time . ‘
’6. Trial date
a. [j The trial has been set for (date):
b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within
12 months ofthe date ofthe ling ofthe complaint (if
not,explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a
referee.
c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
See Attachment 6c .
7. Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
a. [E days (specify number): 20
b. D hours(short causes) (specify):
8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed
in thecaption by the following:
Attorney:
Firm:
Address:
conuence
Telephone number:
Fax number:
E-mail address:
. Party represented:
Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
9. Preference
E This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
a. Counsel has E has not
‘
provided the ADR information package identied in rule 3.221to the client andhas
reviewed ADR options with the client.
b. D All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be completed by (date):
E
'
c. The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status):
CM-110 [Rev January
2009]
1.
.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 ofd
CM-110
‘
3' @LAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward B lard Meline, et al. v..~_NuMBER
TDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. ”7180
10. d. The party or panies are willing to participate in (check all that app/y).
(1) [j Mediation
(2) E3 Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .12 (discovery to close15 days before
arbitration under Cal.Rules of Court, rule 3.822)
'
(3) E3 Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .12 (discovery to remain open until 30 days
before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822)
(4) Q Binding judicial arbitration
(5) C] Binding private arbitration
(6) [j Neutral case evaluation
(7) [E Other (specify): Rule 1600 . 5 (a)
e. [j This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the amount
the statutory limit
in controversy does not exceed
fl: Plaintiff elects to refer this case
Procedure section 1141. 11.
to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount speciedIn Code of Civil
_
j This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811ofthe California Rules of Court (specify exemption):
11. Settlement conference
I The party or parties are willing to participate in an early settlement conference (specify when):
12. insurance
a. insurance carrier, this statement (name):
if any, for party ling
b. Reservation of rights: Yes No
c. Coverage issues will signicantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
13. Jurisdiction
indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case. and describe the status.
CI Bankruptcy Other (specify):
Status:
14. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a. There are companion. underlying. or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
(3) Case number:
(4) Status:
D Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a.
b. [j Amotionto consolidate D coordinate willbe led by (name pan‘y):
15. Bifurcation
E] The party or parties intend to lea motion for an order bifurcating severing, or coordinating the followingIssues or causes of
action (specify moving party type of motion, and reasons).
16. Other motions
The party or parties expect tole the following motions before trial(specify moving party,type ofmotion, and issues):
Unknown at this time .
1"“: “my ‘- 2°09]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 3 of 4
CM—110
'PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward mallard Meline, et al. CASENUMBER'
EEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
17. Discovery
a. The party or parties have completed all discovery.
b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specied (descn'be all anticipated discovery):
E1331 Description
-
D_a§
The Court has appointed a referee in this matter . It is anticipated that
the referee will set discovery and resolve any discovery disputes
c. :1 The following discovery issues are anticipated (specify):
18. Economic Litigation
a. [:l This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation proceduresinCode
of Civil Procedure sections 90 through 98 will apply to this case.
b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
discovery will be led (if checked, explain specically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
should not app/y to this case):
19. Other issues
The party or parties request thatthe following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify): Judge Noel Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter .
20. Meet and confer
a. :l The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
of Court (if not, explain):
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify):
21. Total number of pages attached (ifany):l
am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and ADR. as well as other issues
I
raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case
management
conference. including the written authority of the party where required.
Date: November 22 , 2010
Charleton S. Pearse -
.
(TYPE 0R PRINT NAME) (SIGNATUR~eF~PAR ATTORNEY)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY 0R ATTORNEY)
D Additional signatures are attached.
CM-1 10 [Ravi January 1. 2009] Page 4 0f 4
CASE MANAGEmEN-r STATEMENT
ATTACHMENT 6.c
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Edward Richard Melina. et (II.v. Jack Meline. ct al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
12/09/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59
Owens Coming, et al. v. Vision Plastering, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case N0.: 34-2008-00004614
01/03/11: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Owens Corning. et a1. v. Vision Plastering. et a1.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case N0.: 34-2008—00004614
01/27/1 l: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 A.M., Dept. 59
Cordova Recreation & Park District v. Robert Anthony Nelson. et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2008—0001 0798
02/24/1 l: ISSUES CONFERENCE @ 4:00 p.m., Dept. 2
Unisvs, lnc.. et a1. v. Hoffman Enclosures. 1nc.. ct a1.
Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No.: CIVMSC08-Ol725
03/07/1 1: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 2
Unisys, Inc., et al. v. Hoffman Enclosures, lnc., et a1.
Contra Costa County Superior Court Casc No.: CIVMSCOS-Ol 725
03/15/11: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept.'47
Cordova Recreation & Park District v. Robert Anthony Nelson, et a1.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2008-00010798-
04/04/1 1: TRIAL (14 days)a @ 8. 30 a. m. Dept. TBA
Martinez—Senftner V. Lilia Alcaraz et a]
Placer County Superior C0u1t Case No.. SCV22800
ATI‘ACHMEN'I‘ 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page l of l
Edward Richard Meline, et a].v. Jack Melina, ct al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
PROOF OF SERVICE
l,Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed
in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is
1030- 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily
practice of the law ofces of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service.
On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following
parties:
Nels A. Christensen James B. Berglund William A. Ward
& LLP
'
Christensen Schwartz, Attorney at Law Attorney atLaw
l Governors Lane 1838 Feather River Blvd. 9 Williamsburg Lane
Chico, CA 95926 Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926
Facsimile:(530) 343-6454 Facsimile: (530) 532-1002 Facsimile: (530) 342-7920
Richard L. Crabtree John Jeffrey Caner
Attorney at Law Attorney at Law
1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 P.O. Box 3606
Chico, CA 95973 . Chico, CA 95927
Facsimile: (530) 566-9203 Facsimile: (530) 342-6195
_X_ (BY MAIL) [placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for first-class
mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action.
(BY CERTIFIED MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully
prepaid forcertified mail, return receipt requested, for collection and mailing on the parties
in said action.
(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) l personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s)
noted above.
(BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile to the telephone
number(s) hereafter.
(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy ofthe within document(s) in a
sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail.
l declare under penalty ofperj ury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on November 22, 2010 in Sacramento,
California.
\
l
WEVE saw
PROOF OF SERVICE
Preview
~ CM-110 :1 _NT_0RNEY OR PAR‘IY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, S!‘ _I number. and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY .J — 'térleton S. Pearse, SBN 122491 eana B. Pipkin, SBN 208915 Slater LLP _ " Lenahan, Lee, & Pearse, 1030 15th Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 TELEPHONENO; (91 6) 4 43—1030 FAXNo (91 6) (Optional). 4 4 3-08 69 g“: SuperiorCourt of California EWmAmmasmmmw:Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger, Frederick Rabo, Cnuntv of Bufte g: mmmmvmnmmw.Rona1d Rabo, Michael Rabo, Susan Miller B SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Butte L E E . STREETADDRESSS655 Oleander Avenue my 2a 20m é MNLING ADDRESS 655 Oleander Chico , CITY AND zip CODE: CA Avenue 9 5 92 6 D Kim“ 1vria er,Clark 5 By BRANCH NAME Deputy PLAINTIFF/PETITIONERzEdward Richard Meline, et al. Meline and Sharon et a1. arty/6‘56 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENTzJack Meline, CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER' (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE [:3 LIMITED CASE 12 7 1 8 O (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25.000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: December 10, 2010 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept; CO9 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): D Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specied information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. E This statement is submitted by party (name): / Susan Mlller, Michael . _X . b. Thisslatementissubmittedjointlybyparties (names):Ronald Rabo, Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was led on (date): r b. _X The cross-complaint, if any. was led on (date): December 27 , 2O06 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. X All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been sewed. or have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [:3 have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. _ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which they may be served): : 4. Description of case a. Type ofcasein complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross—complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property. Page1of 4 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules otCourt. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ~ Judicial Council of California a1 3720-3730 rules CM-1 10 [Rev. January 1. 2009] - Sofuetg ns %Pus BY FAX CM-110 .3 ‘PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:Edward ruchard Meline, et al. CASENUMBER‘ 127180 LDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case,including any damages] (/fpersonal injmy damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date ndicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost eamings to date, and estimated future lost eamings. describe the nature of the relief) If equitable relief is sought, The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an inj unction; The cross—complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property . (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b‘) 5. Jury or nonjury trial w The party or parties request a jury trialE a nonjury trial. (/f more than one party, provide the name of each party Unknown requesting ajury tn’al): at this time . ‘ ’6. Trial date a. [j The trial has been set for (date): b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months ofthe date ofthe ling ofthe complaint (if not,explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a referee. c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): See Attachment 6c . 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. [E days (specify number): 20 b. D hours(short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in thecaption by the following: Attorney: Firm: Address: conuence Telephone number: Fax number: E-mail address: . Party represented: Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9. Preference E This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a. Counsel has E has not ‘ provided the ADR information package identied in rule 3.221to the client andhas reviewed ADR options with the client. b. D All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be completed by (date): E ' c. The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status): CM-110 [Rev January 2009] 1. . CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 ofd CM-110 ‘ 3' @LAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward B lard Meline, et al. v..~_NuMBER TDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. ”7180 10. d. The party or panies are willing to participate in (check all that app/y). (1) [j Mediation (2) E3 Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .12 (discovery to close15 days before arbitration under Cal.Rules of Court, rule 3.822) ' (3) E3 Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .12 (discovery to remain open until 30 days before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822) (4) Q Binding judicial arbitration (5) C] Binding private arbitration (6) [j Neutral case evaluation (7) [E Other (specify): Rule 1600 . 5 (a) e. [j This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the amount the statutory limit in controversy does not exceed fl: Plaintiff elects to refer this case Procedure section 1141. 11. to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount speciedIn Code of Civil _ j This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811ofthe California Rules of Court (specify exemption): 11. Settlement conference I The party or parties are willing to participate in an early settlement conference (specify when): 12. insurance a. insurance carrier, this statement (name): if any, for party ling b. Reservation of rights: Yes No c. Coverage issues will signicantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 13. Jurisdiction indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case. and describe the status. CI Bankruptcy Other (specify): Status: 14. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. There are companion. underlying. or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: D Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a. b. [j Amotionto consolidate D coordinate willbe led by (name pan‘y): 15. Bifurcation E] The party or parties intend to lea motion for an order bifurcating severing, or coordinating the followingIssues or causes of action (specify moving party type of motion, and reasons). 16. Other motions The party or parties expect tole the following motions before trial(specify moving party,type ofmotion, and issues): Unknown at this time . 1"“: “my ‘- 2°09] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 3 of 4 CM—110 'PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward mallard Meline, et al. CASENUMBER' EEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 17. Discovery a. The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specied (descn'be all anticipated discovery): E1331 Description - D_a§ The Court has appointed a referee in this matter . It is anticipated that the referee will set discovery and resolve any discovery disputes c. :1 The following discovery issues are anticipated (specify): 18. Economic Litigation a. [:l This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation proceduresinCode of Civil Procedure sections 90 through 98 will apply to this case. b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be led (if checked, explain specically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not app/y to this case): 19. Other issues The party or parties request thatthe following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): Judge Noel Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter . 20. Meet and confer a. :l The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 21. Total number of pages attached (ifany):l am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and ADR. as well as other issues I raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference. including the written authority of the party where required. Date: November 22 , 2010 Charleton S. Pearse - . (TYPE 0R PRINT NAME) (SIGNATUR~eF~PAR ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY 0R ATTORNEY) D Additional signatures are attached. CM-1 10 [Ravi January 1. 2009] Page 4 0f 4 CASE MANAGEmEN-r STATEMENT ATTACHMENT 6.c CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Edward Richard Melina. et (II.v. Jack Meline. ct al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 12/09/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 59 Owens Coming, et al. v. Vision Plastering, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case N0.: 34-2008-00004614 01/03/11: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Owens Corning. et a1. v. Vision Plastering. et a1. Sacramento County Superior Court Case N0.: 34-2008—00004614 01/27/1 l: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 A.M., Dept. 59 Cordova Recreation & Park District v. Robert Anthony Nelson. et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2008—0001 0798 02/24/1 l: ISSUES CONFERENCE @ 4:00 p.m., Dept. 2 Unisvs, lnc.. et a1. v. Hoffman Enclosures. 1nc.. ct a1. Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No.: CIVMSC08-Ol725 03/07/1 1: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 2 Unisys, Inc., et al. v. Hoffman Enclosures, lnc., et a1. Contra Costa County Superior Court Casc No.: CIVMSCOS-Ol 725 03/15/11: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept.'47 Cordova Recreation & Park District v. Robert Anthony Nelson, et a1. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2008-00010798- 04/04/1 1: TRIAL (14 days)a @ 8. 30 a. m. Dept. TBA Martinez—Senftner V. Lilia Alcaraz et a] Placer County Superior C0u1t Case No.. SCV22800 ATI‘ACHMEN'I‘ 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page l of l Edward Richard Meline, et a].v. Jack Melina, ct al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 PROOF OF SERVICE l,Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1030- 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily practice of the law ofces of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following parties: Nels A. Christensen James B. Berglund William A. Ward & LLP ' Christensen Schwartz, Attorney at Law Attorney atLaw l Governors Lane 1838 Feather River Blvd. 9 Williamsburg Lane Chico, CA 95926 Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926 Facsimile:(530) 343-6454 Facsimile: (530) 532-1002 Facsimile: (530) 342-7920 Richard L. Crabtree John Jeffrey Caner Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 P.O. Box 3606 Chico, CA 95973 . Chico, CA 95927 Facsimile: (530) 566-9203 Facsimile: (530) 342-6195 _X_ (BY MAIL) [placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for first-class mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action. (BY CERTIFIED MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid forcertified mail, return receipt requested, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action. (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) l personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s) noted above. (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile to the telephone number(s) hereafter. (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy ofthe within document(s) in a sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail. l declare under penalty ofperj ury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on November 22, 2010 in Sacramento, California. \ l WEVE saw PROOF OF SERVICE