Preview
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Ni 9, Stale Bar number, and address)
@ FOR COURT USE ONLY
CM-110
Charleton S. Pearse, SBN 122491
[Jeana B. Pipkin, SBN 208915
Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP
1030 15th Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
tevepHone
No: (916) 443-1030 FAXNO. (Optional (916) 443-0869
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona): Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger, Frederick Rabo,
iJ
ATTORNEY
FOR (Name): Ronald Rabo, Michael Rabo, Susan Miller Butte County
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Butte Superior Court
street aporess:655 Oleander Avenue
MAILING ADoRess:655 Oleander Avenue Nov 25 2009 L
city AND ziP cove: Chico, CA 95926
WS,
BRANCH NAME: hea St ig
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONEREGward Richard Meline, et al. enuty
By:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): [X] UNLIMITED CASE _.| LIMITED CASE 127180
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less) |
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: April 10, 2009 Time:10:30 a.m. Dept.: CO9 Div.: Room:
co
Adc “Tress above):
|e ] L / Vt / a 9 ? alephone, by (name):
de boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
:d by party (name): BY FAX
-djointly by parties (names): Ronald Rabo, Susan Miller, Michael
muse, rary mun xabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo
Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
T
a. complaint was filed on (date):
b. [CX] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 27, 2006
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. [X] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, or have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [] have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. {1 The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint (3¢] cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The
cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property.
Page 1 of 4
Form fod for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
= Judicial Council of Califomia CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘ules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2009]
BA LVS
e @ ‘CASE NUMBER:
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al.
127180
|DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et
a.
4. be Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.)
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The
cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property.
(1) (if more space is needed, check this box and altach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request (CC ajury trial (] a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party
requesting a jury trial): Unknown at this time.
Trial date
a. ((_] The trial has been set for (date):
b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
not, explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a
referee.
c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
See Attachment 6c.
Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
a. LX] days (specify number): 20
b. [__] hours (short causes) (specify):
Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial X | by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following:
Attorney:
Firm:
Address:
Telephone number:
Fax number:
E-mail address:
Party represented:
Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
Preference
() This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
a. Counsel has (J has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and has
reviewed ADR options with the client.
b. [_] All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be completed by (date):
c. [_] The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status):
CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2009} CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 4
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al.
@ CASE NUMBER:
CM-110
127180
|DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.
10. d. The party or parties are willing to participate in (check all that apply):
(1) (2) Mediation
(2) [_] Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to close 15 days before
arbitration under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822)
(3) [] Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to remain open until 30 days
before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822)
(4) [_} Binding judicial arbitration
(5) Binding private arbitration
(6) [__] Neutral case evaluation
(7) Other (specify): Rule 1600.5 (a)
e This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the amount in controversy does not exceed
the statutory limit.
f. (J Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil
Procedure section 1141.11.
g. [_] This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court (specify exemption):
11. Settlement conference
(] The party or parties are willing to participate in an early settlement conference (specify when):
12. Insurance
a. [_] Insurance carrer, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
b. Reservation of rights: [] Yes ["] No
c Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
13. Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case, and describe the status.
Bankruptcy Other (specify):
Status:
14, Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a. [__] There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
(3) Case number:
(4) Status:
{_] Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a.
b. [] Amotion to (J consolidate CJ coordinate will be filed by (name party):
15. Bifurcation
(The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
16, Other motions
[3c] The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
Unknown at this time.
CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2003] Page
3 of 4
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
@ @ CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. ‘CASE NUMBER:
|DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.|127180
17. Discovery
a. [__] The party or parties have completed all discovery.
b. [3C] The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
Party Description Date
The Court has appointed a referee in this matter. It is anticipated that
the referee will set discovery and resolve any discovery disputes
c. [_] The following discovery issues are anticipated (specify):
18. Economic Litigation
a. [_] This is a limited civil case (.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
of Civil Procedure sections 90 through 98 will apply to this case.
b. [J This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
should not apply to this case):
19. Other issues
The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify): Judge Noel Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter.
20. Meet and confer
a. [_] The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the Califormia Rules
of Court (if not, explain):
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify):
21. Total number of pages attached (if any):2
!'am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and ADR, as well as other issues
saised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management
conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
Date: November 24, 2009
Charleton S. Pearse
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) {SIGNATURE OF P/ OR ATTORNEY)
(TVPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
(] Additional signatures are attached.
‘CN-110 [Rev. January 1, 2009) Page 40f4
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
@ e
ATTACHMENT 6.c
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack Meline, et al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
11/30/09: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @11:00 a.m., Dept. 11A
Ronald Lee Williams v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Inc.
El Dorado County Superior Court Case No.: SC20090018
12/14/09: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 2
Old Republic Insurance Company v. Joel Christian Even. et al.
Santa Clara Superior Court Case No.: 108CV121996
01/04/10: TRIAL (8 days) @ 8:45 a.m., Dept. 2
Old Republic Insurance Company v. Joel Christian Even, et al.
Santa Clara Superior Court Case No.: 108CV121996
01/08/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. C17
Brian Boley v. Primus, Inc., et al.
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2009-00117685
01/11/10: TRIAL (4 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 4
Ronald Lee Williams v. Sierra Pacific Power Company. Inc.
El Dorado County Superior Court Case No.: SC20090018
01/11/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 2:00 p.m., Dept. 4
David R. Baxter vs. Ti lumne Processing, et al.
Tuolumne County Superior Court Case No.: CV53784
01/14/10; SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
Owens Corning v. Vision Plastering, et al.
Sacramento Superior Court Case No.: 34-2008-00004614
01/27/10: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:00 a.m., Dept. 4
David R. Baxter, Sr. vs. Tuolumne Processing, et al.
Tuolumne County Superior Court Case No.: CV53784
02/18/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
City of Folsom v. Sally Kwong, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-0003 1683
02/23/10: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Owens Corningv. Vision Plastering, et al.
Sacramento Superior Court Case No.: 34-2008-00004614
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page | of 2
e e
03/01/10: TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. C17
Brian Boley v. Primus, Inc., et al.
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2009-001 17685
03/15/10 TRIAL (5 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
City of Folsom v. Sally Kwong, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-0003 1683
03/24/10: ISSUES CONFERENCE @ 4:30 p.m., Dept. 2
Terese Hammett, et al. v. Meribeth Germino, et al.
Contra Costa Superior Court Case No.: C08-00935
04/05/10: TRIAL (8 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 2
Terese Hammett, et al. v. Meribeth Germino, et al.
Contra Costa Superior Court Case No.: C08-00935
05/14/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Gloria Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al.
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-0022800
05/21/10: TRIAL CONFERENCE
Gloria Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al.
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-0022800
06/01/10: TRIAL (30 day)
Gloria Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al.
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-0022800
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of 2
e @
Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack Meline, et al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed
in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is
1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily
practice of the law offices of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service.
On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following
parties:
10
Nels A. Christensen James B. Berglund William A. Ward
M1 Christensen & Schwartz, LLP Attorney at Law Attorney at Law
1 Governors Lane 1838 Feather River Blvd. 9 Williamsburg Lane
12 Chico, CA 95926 Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926
Facsimile:(530) 343-6454 Facsimile: (530) 532-1002 Facsimile: (530) 342-7920
13
Richard L. Crabtree John Jeffrey Carter
14 Attorney at Law Attorney at Law
1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 P.O. Box 3606
15 Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95927
Facsimile: (530) 566-9203 Facsimile: (530) 342-6195
16
17 X
AL (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with stage thereon fully prepaid for first-class
mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action.
18
(BY CERTIFIED MAIL ) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully
19 prepaid for certified mail, return receipt requested, for collection and mailing on the parties
in said action.
20
(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) | personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s)
21 noted above.
22 (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile-to the telephone|
number(s) hereafter.
23
(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy of the within document(s) in a
24 sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail.
25 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
26 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on November 24, 2009 in Sacramento,
27 California.
28
dD . JAMES ¢C J
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
Preview
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Ni 9, Stale Bar number, and address) @ FOR COURT USE ONLY CM-110 Charleton S. Pearse, SBN 122491 [Jeana B. Pipkin, SBN 208915 Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP 1030 15th Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 tevepHone No: (916) 443-1030 FAXNO. (Optional (916) 443-0869 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona): Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger, Frederick Rabo, iJ ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Ronald Rabo, Michael Rabo, Susan Miller Butte County SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Butte Superior Court street aporess:655 Oleander Avenue MAILING ADoRess:655 Oleander Avenue Nov 25 2009 L city AND ziP cove: Chico, CA 95926 WS, BRANCH NAME: hea St ig PLAINTIFF/PETITIONEREGward Richard Meline, et al. enuty By: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): [X] UNLIMITED CASE _.| LIMITED CASE 127180 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) | A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: April 10, 2009 Time:10:30 a.m. Dept.: CO9 Div.: Room: co Adc “Tress above): |e ] L / Vt / a 9 ? alephone, by (name): de boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. :d by party (name): BY FAX -djointly by parties (names): Ronald Rabo, Susan Miller, Michael muse, rary mun xabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) T a. complaint was filed on (date): b. [CX] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 27, 2006 Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. [X] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, or have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [] have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. {1 The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in complaint (3¢] cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property. Page 1 of 4 Form fod for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, = Judicial Council of Califomia CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘ules 3.720-3.730 CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2009] BA LVS e @ ‘CASE NUMBER: CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. 127180 |DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et a. 4. be Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property. (1) (if more space is needed, check this box and altach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request (CC ajury trial (] a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): Unknown at this time. Trial date a. ((_] The trial has been set for (date): b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a referee. c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): See Attachment 6c. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. LX] days (specify number): 20 b. [__] hours (short causes) (specify): Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial X | by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following: Attorney: Firm: Address: Telephone number: Fax number: E-mail address: Party represented: Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. Preference () This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a. Counsel has (J has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and has reviewed ADR options with the client. b. [_] All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be completed by (date): c. [_] The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status): CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2009} CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 4 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. @ CASE NUMBER: CM-110 127180 |DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 10. d. The party or parties are willing to participate in (check all that apply): (1) (2) Mediation (2) [_] Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to close 15 days before arbitration under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822) (3) [] Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to remain open until 30 days before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822) (4) [_} Binding judicial arbitration (5) Binding private arbitration (6) [__] Neutral case evaluation (7) Other (specify): Rule 1600.5 (a) e This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. f. (J Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. g. [_] This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court (specify exemption): 11. Settlement conference (] The party or parties are willing to participate in an early settlement conference (specify when): 12. Insurance a. [_] Insurance carrer, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: [] Yes ["] No c Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 13. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case, and describe the status. Bankruptcy Other (specify): Status: 14, Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. [__] There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: {_] Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a. b. [] Amotion to (J consolidate CJ coordinate will be filed by (name party): 15. Bifurcation (The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 16, Other motions [3c] The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): Unknown at this time. CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2003] Page 3 of 4 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT @ @ CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. ‘CASE NUMBER: |DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.|127180 17. Discovery a. [__] The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. [3C] The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date The Court has appointed a referee in this matter. It is anticipated that the referee will set discovery and resolve any discovery disputes c. [_] The following discovery issues are anticipated (specify): 18. Economic Litigation a. [_] This is a limited civil case (.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90 through 98 will apply to this case. b. [J This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 19. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): Judge Noel Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter. 20. Meet and confer a. [_] The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the Califormia Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 21. Total number of pages attached (if any):2 !'am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and ADR, as well as other issues saised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: November 24, 2009 Charleton S. Pearse (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) {SIGNATURE OF P/ OR ATTORNEY) (TVPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (] Additional signatures are attached. ‘CN-110 [Rev. January 1, 2009) Page 40f4 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT @ e ATTACHMENT 6.c CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack Meline, et al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 11/30/09: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @11:00 a.m., Dept. 11A Ronald Lee Williams v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Inc. El Dorado County Superior Court Case No.: SC20090018 12/14/09: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 2 Old Republic Insurance Company v. Joel Christian Even. et al. Santa Clara Superior Court Case No.: 108CV121996 01/04/10: TRIAL (8 days) @ 8:45 a.m., Dept. 2 Old Republic Insurance Company v. Joel Christian Even, et al. Santa Clara Superior Court Case No.: 108CV121996 01/08/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. C17 Brian Boley v. Primus, Inc., et al. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2009-00117685 01/11/10: TRIAL (4 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 4 Ronald Lee Williams v. Sierra Pacific Power Company. Inc. El Dorado County Superior Court Case No.: SC20090018 01/11/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 2:00 p.m., Dept. 4 David R. Baxter vs. Ti lumne Processing, et al. Tuolumne County Superior Court Case No.: CV53784 01/14/10; SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 Owens Corning v. Vision Plastering, et al. Sacramento Superior Court Case No.: 34-2008-00004614 01/27/10: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:00 a.m., Dept. 4 David R. Baxter, Sr. vs. Tuolumne Processing, et al. Tuolumne County Superior Court Case No.: CV53784 02/18/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 City of Folsom v. Sally Kwong, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-0003 1683 02/23/10: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Owens Corningv. Vision Plastering, et al. Sacramento Superior Court Case No.: 34-2008-00004614 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page | of 2 e e 03/01/10: TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. C17 Brian Boley v. Primus, Inc., et al. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2009-001 17685 03/15/10 TRIAL (5 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 City of Folsom v. Sally Kwong, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2009-0003 1683 03/24/10: ISSUES CONFERENCE @ 4:30 p.m., Dept. 2 Terese Hammett, et al. v. Meribeth Germino, et al. Contra Costa Superior Court Case No.: C08-00935 04/05/10: TRIAL (8 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 2 Terese Hammett, et al. v. Meribeth Germino, et al. Contra Costa Superior Court Case No.: C08-00935 05/14/10: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Gloria Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al. Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-0022800 05/21/10: TRIAL CONFERENCE Gloria Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al. Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-0022800 06/01/10: TRIAL (30 day) Gloria Martinez-Senftner v. Lilia Alcaraz, et al. Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-0022800 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of 2 e @ Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack Meline, et al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily practice of the law offices of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following parties: 10 Nels A. Christensen James B. Berglund William A. Ward M1 Christensen & Schwartz, LLP Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 1 Governors Lane 1838 Feather River Blvd. 9 Williamsburg Lane 12 Chico, CA 95926 Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926 Facsimile:(530) 343-6454 Facsimile: (530) 532-1002 Facsimile: (530) 342-7920 13 Richard L. Crabtree John Jeffrey Carter 14 Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 P.O. Box 3606 15 Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95927 Facsimile: (530) 566-9203 Facsimile: (530) 342-6195 16 17 X AL (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with stage thereon fully prepaid for first-class mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action. 18 (BY CERTIFIED MAIL ) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully 19 prepaid for certified mail, return receipt requested, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action. 20 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) | personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s) 21 noted above. 22 (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile-to the telephone| number(s) hereafter. 23 (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy of the within document(s) in a 24 sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail. 25 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 26 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on November 24, 2009 in Sacramento, 27 California. 28 dD . JAMES ¢C J 1 PROOF OF SERVICE