Preview
i e CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) ‘FOR COURT
USE ONLY
[Charleton S. Pearse, SBN 122491
Jeana B. Pipkin, SBN 208915
Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP Se
1030 15th Street, Suite 300 ukD
Bue, Oo
Sacramento, CA 95814 een 3 Oo
TELEPHONE NO: (916) 443-1030 FAXNO. (Optionay: (916) 443-0869
28 wl
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionay: Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger, Frederick Rabo, Ee
ATIORNEY FOR (Name: RONAld Rabo, Michael Rabo,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Butte
Susan Miller
u=
mo ies D
idbee
sTREETADORESS 655 Oleander Avenue
Deputy
maiinc aporess:655 Oleander Avenue
cry AnD zip cove: Chico, CA 95926
BRANCH NAME:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al.
IDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): X | UNLIMITED CASE (J umrtep case
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 | 127180
exceeds $25,000) or less)
FAX.FTLING
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: August 10, 2007 Time:10:30 a.m. Dept.: CO9 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. [_] This statement is submitted by party (name):
This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Ronald Rabo, Susan Miller, Michael
Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. [XJ The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 27, 2006
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. LX] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, or have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [__] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1] have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [1] have had a default entered against them (specify names):
¢. [] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint CX] cross-complaint (describe, including causes of action):
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The
cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property.
Page tof 4
is
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Coun,
Judicial Council
of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘ules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 (Rev. January 1, 2007)
jut) iit vA,
@ @
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER:
| DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
eamings to date, and estimated future lost eamings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.)
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The
cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property.
() (ifmore space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request a jury trial a nonjury trial (if more than one party, provide the name of each party
requesting
a jury trial): Unknown at this time.
Trial date
a. [__] The trial has been set for (date):
b. [X] No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
not, explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a
referee.
¢. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
See Attachment 6c.
Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
a. [CX] days (specify number): 20
b. [_] hours (short causes) (specify):
Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
qne party or parties will be represented at trial [_X_] by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following:
Attorney:
Firm:
Address:
Telephone number:
Fax number:
E-mail address:
Party represented:
_| Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
Preference
This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
a. Counsel [__] has [] has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and has
reviewed ADR options with the client.
b. [_] All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be completed by (date):
c. [_] The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status):
(CM-130 [Rov. January 1, 2007) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page
2 of 4
@ @ CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER:
[DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
10. d. The party or parties are willing-to participate in (check all that apply):
(1) Mediation
@ CI Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to close 15 days before
arbitration under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822)
@Co Nonbindi judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to remain open until 30 days
before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822)
@ CI Binding judicial arbitration
(5) Binding private arbitration
@)
(7) te Neutral case evaluation
Other (specify): Rule 1600.5(a)
e. [__] This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit.
f. [J] Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil
Procedure section 1141.11.
g. [J This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court (specify exemption):
11. Settlement conference
[) The panty or parties are willing to participate in an early settlement conference (specify when):
12. Insurance
a. [__] Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
b. Reservation of rights: [ColyYes [7] No
c. [__] Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
13. Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case, and describe the status.
(_) Bankruptcy = [—] Other (specify):
Status:
14. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
[)
é(3)
(4)
Case number:
Status:
Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a.
b. [_] Amotion to [J consolidate (1 coordinate will be filed by (name party):
15. Bifurcation
{) The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
16. Other motions
(2c) The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
Unknown at this time.
(GM-110 [Rev. January1, 2007] Page 3ot4
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
@ e CM-110 *
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. ‘CASE NUMBER:
|DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.|127180
17. Discovery
a. [_] The party or parties have completed all discovery.
b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
Party Description Date
The Court has appointed a referee in this matter. It is anticipated that
the referee will set discovery and resolve any discovery disputes
c. The following discovery issues are anticipated (specify):
18. Economic Litigation
a. [__] This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
of Civil Procedure sections 90 through 98 will apply to this case.
b. (_] This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
should not apply to this case):
19. Other issues
The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify): Judge Noel Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter.
20. Meet and confer
a The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
of Court (if not, explain):
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify):
21. Case management orders
Previous case management orders in this case are (check one): X] none [__] attached as Attachment 21.
22. Total number of pages attached (if any): 2
{am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and ADR, as well as other issues
raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management
conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
Date: July 26, 2007
Charleton S. Pearse » A ftettaLy 2
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF ‘OR ATTORNEY)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
(-] Additional signatures are attached
CM-110 [Rev. January
1, 2007) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page
4 of 4
e e
ATTACHMENT 6.c
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CASE Name: Edward Richard Meline, et al. _v. Jack Meline, et al
COURT AND CASE NUMBER: Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
09/06/07: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 2:30 p.m., Dept. 2
uto Dealer: i rf ifornia, Inc. v. Mary Vuoso., et al
Tuolumne County Superior Court Case No.: CV52151
09/24/07 TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:30 a.m., Dept. 206
Lavinia Jackson v. Wendy Brown, et al.
San Francisco County Superior Court Case No.: CGC- 05-447238
10/01/07. TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:00 a.m., Dept. 2
Auto Dealers Compensation of California, Inc. v. Mary Vuoso, et al.
Tuolumne County Superior Court Case No.: CV52151
10/03/07: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 16
Ana Salgado, et al. v. Irene Wendy Bronner, et al.
Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 106CV072263
10/09/07: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 16
a Sal, do, et al. Wi onner, et al.
Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.::106CV072263
12/06/07. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 3:00 p.m., Dept. 13
Dionisio Cabaccang, et al. v. John Robert Galbraith, et al.
San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.: CV024723
12/17/07. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6
Kurt Lyon v. Allan Lansberry, et al.
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 72135
01/07/08: TRIAL (7 days) @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 13
Dionisio Cabaccang, et al. v. John Robert Galbraith, et al.
San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.: CV024723
01/11/08 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6
y. Allan Lansber etal.
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 72135
01/23/08 TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6
Ki v. Allan Lansber etal.
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 72135
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 1 of2
e @
02/11/08: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 2:00 p.m., Dept. 42
Jose Duarte v. Floyd Wilson, et al.
San Joaquin Superior Court Case No.: CV031760
03/03/08: TRIAL (7 days) @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 42
Jose Duarte v. Floyd Wilson. et al
San Joaquin Superior Court Case No.: CV031760
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of2
@
Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack Meline, et al.
Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180
PRO F SERVICE
I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed
in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is
1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. 1 am readily familiar with the daily
practice of the law offices of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service.
On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following
parties:
10
Nels A. Christensen James B. Berglund William A. Ward
ll Christensen & Schwartz, LLP Attommey at Law Attorney at Law
1 Governors Lane 1838 Feather River Blvd. 9 Williamsburg Lane
12 Chico, CA 95926 Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926 .
13 Richard L. Crabtree John Jeffrey Carter
Attorney at Law Attorney at Law
14 1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 P.O. Box 3606
Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95927
15
16 X (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for first-class
mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action.
17
(BY CERTIFIED MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully
18 repaid for certified mail, return receipt requested, for collection and mailing on the parties
In said action.
19
(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s)
20 noted above.
21 (BY FACSIMILE) | caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile to the telephond
number(s) hereafter.
22
(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy of the within document(s) in a
23 sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail.
24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
25 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on July 26, 2007 in Sacramento, California.
26
27 DI A.J
28
Proof of Service
. @ @
PRO LEGAL SERVICES
1127 Oakdale Street
Chico, CA 95928
PH: 530-228-3363, FX: 530-892-2264
FAX FILING CERTIFICATION BY FAX FILING
AGENCY
In compliance with RULE 2005, FILING THROUGH FAX FILING AGENCY,
subsection (e), CERTIFICATION, this document certifies that I, Mary Galvin, have
complied with the rules as stated under Rule 2.303. Filing through fax filing agency of
the SPECIAL RULES FOR TRIAL COURTS, regarding filing documents by fax and
that the document(s) to be filed. Specified in this certification is/are the full and unaltered
facsimile-produced document(s) received by fax.
Each of the specified document(s) that this certification pertains to are notated with the
phrase “FAX FILING” immediately below the title of the document(s), and is/are
specified as follows:
Case Number: 127180
Case Management Statement _
The document(s) specified in this certification were received from the following
authorizing agency:
One Legal, Inc., on behalf of
Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP
1030 15" Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: July 26, 2007
Signature;
Hendren
Pro Legal Services
Butte #113
Preview
i e CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) ‘FOR COURT USE ONLY [Charleton S. Pearse, SBN 122491 Jeana B. Pipkin, SBN 208915 Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP Se 1030 15th Street, Suite 300 ukD Bue, Oo Sacramento, CA 95814 een 3 Oo TELEPHONE NO: (916) 443-1030 FAXNO. (Optionay: (916) 443-0869 28 wl E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionay: Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger, Frederick Rabo, Ee ATIORNEY FOR (Name: RONAld Rabo, Michael Rabo, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Butte Susan Miller u= mo ies D idbee sTREETADORESS 655 Oleander Avenue Deputy maiinc aporess:655 Oleander Avenue cry AnD zip cove: Chico, CA 95926 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. IDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): X | UNLIMITED CASE (J umrtep case (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 | 127180 exceeds $25,000) or less) FAX.FTLING A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: August 10, 2007 Time:10:30 a.m. Dept.: CO9 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. [_] This statement is submitted by party (name): This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Ronald Rabo, Susan Miller, Michael Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. [XJ The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 27, 2006 Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. LX] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, or have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [__] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1] have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) (1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [1] have had a default entered against them (specify names): ¢. [] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in complaint CX] cross-complaint (describe, including causes of action): The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property. Page tof 4 is Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Coun, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘ules 3.720-3.730 CM-110 (Rev. January 1, 2007) jut) iit vA, @ @ CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER: | DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost eamings to date, and estimated future lost eamings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partition an additional parcel of real property. () (ifmore space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request a jury trial a nonjury trial (if more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): Unknown at this time. Trial date a. [__] The trial has been set for (date): b. [X] No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): This case is extremely complex and has been assigned to a referee. ¢. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): See Attachment 6c. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. [CX] days (specify number): 20 b. [_] hours (short causes) (specify): Trial representation (to be answered for each party) qne party or parties will be represented at trial [_X_] by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following: Attorney: Firm: Address: Telephone number: Fax number: E-mail address: Party represented: _| Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. Preference This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a. Counsel [__] has [] has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and has reviewed ADR options with the client. b. [_] All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be completed by (date): c. [_] The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status): (CM-130 [Rov. January 1, 2007) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 4 @ @ CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER: [DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 10. d. The party or parties are willing-to participate in (check all that apply): (1) Mediation @ CI Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to close 15 days before arbitration under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822) @Co Nonbindi judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to remain open until 30 days before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.822) @ CI Binding judicial arbitration (5) Binding private arbitration @) (7) te Neutral case evaluation Other (specify): Rule 1600.5(a) e. [__] This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. f. [J] Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. g. [J This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court (specify exemption): 11. Settlement conference [) The panty or parties are willing to participate in an early settlement conference (specify when): 12. Insurance a. [__] Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: [ColyYes [7] No c. [__] Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 13. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case, and describe the status. (_) Bankruptcy = [—] Other (specify): Status: 14. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: [) é(3) (4) Case number: Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a. b. [_] Amotion to [J consolidate (1 coordinate will be filed by (name party): 15. Bifurcation {) The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 16. Other motions (2c) The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): Unknown at this time. (GM-110 [Rev. January1, 2007] Page 3ot4 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT @ e CM-110 * PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. ‘CASE NUMBER: |DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.|127180 17. Discovery a. [_] The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date The Court has appointed a referee in this matter. It is anticipated that the referee will set discovery and resolve any discovery disputes c. The following discovery issues are anticipated (specify): 18. Economic Litigation a. [__] This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90 through 98 will apply to this case. b. (_] This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 19. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): Judge Noel Watkins has been appointed Referee in this matter. 20. Meet and confer a The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 21. Case management orders Previous case management orders in this case are (check one): X] none [__] attached as Attachment 21. 22. Total number of pages attached (if any): 2 {am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and ADR, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: July 26, 2007 Charleton S. Pearse » A ftettaLy 2 (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF ‘OR ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (-] Additional signatures are attached CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2007) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4 of 4 e e ATTACHMENT 6.c CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE Name: Edward Richard Meline, et al. _v. Jack Meline, et al COURT AND CASE NUMBER: Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 09/06/07: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 2:30 p.m., Dept. 2 uto Dealer: i rf ifornia, Inc. v. Mary Vuoso., et al Tuolumne County Superior Court Case No.: CV52151 09/24/07 TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:30 a.m., Dept. 206 Lavinia Jackson v. Wendy Brown, et al. San Francisco County Superior Court Case No.: CGC- 05-447238 10/01/07. TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:00 a.m., Dept. 2 Auto Dealers Compensation of California, Inc. v. Mary Vuoso, et al. Tuolumne County Superior Court Case No.: CV52151 10/03/07: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 16 Ana Salgado, et al. v. Irene Wendy Bronner, et al. Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 106CV072263 10/09/07: TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 16 a Sal, do, et al. Wi onner, et al. Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.::106CV072263 12/06/07. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 3:00 p.m., Dept. 13 Dionisio Cabaccang, et al. v. John Robert Galbraith, et al. San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.: CV024723 12/17/07. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6 Kurt Lyon v. Allan Lansberry, et al. Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 72135 01/07/08: TRIAL (7 days) @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 13 Dionisio Cabaccang, et al. v. John Robert Galbraith, et al. San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.: CV024723 01/11/08 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. 6 y. Allan Lansber etal. Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 72135 01/23/08 TRIAL (7 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 6 Ki v. Allan Lansber etal. Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 72135 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 1 of2 e @ 02/11/08: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 2:00 p.m., Dept. 42 Jose Duarte v. Floyd Wilson, et al. San Joaquin Superior Court Case No.: CV031760 03/03/08: TRIAL (7 days) @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 42 Jose Duarte v. Floyd Wilson. et al San Joaquin Superior Court Case No.: CV031760 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of2 @ Edward Richard Meline, et al. v. Jack Meline, et al. Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 PRO F SERVICE I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814. 1 am readily familiar with the daily practice of the law offices of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following parties: 10 Nels A. Christensen James B. Berglund William A. Ward ll Christensen & Schwartz, LLP Attommey at Law Attorney at Law 1 Governors Lane 1838 Feather River Blvd. 9 Williamsburg Lane 12 Chico, CA 95926 Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926 . 13 Richard L. Crabtree John Jeffrey Carter Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 14 1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 P.O. Box 3606 Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95927 15 16 X (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for first-class mail, for collection and mailing on the parties in said action. 17 (BY CERTIFIED MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully 18 repaid for certified mail, return receipt requested, for collection and mailing on the parties In said action. 19 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I personally delivered by hand said documents to the addressee(s) 20 noted above. 21 (BY FACSIMILE) | caused the said document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile to the telephond number(s) hereafter. 22 (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and correct copy of the within document(s) in a 23 sealed envelope and deposited in the Federal Express depository for overnight mail. 24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 25 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on July 26, 2007 in Sacramento, California. 26 27 DI A.J 28 Proof of Service . @ @ PRO LEGAL SERVICES 1127 Oakdale Street Chico, CA 95928 PH: 530-228-3363, FX: 530-892-2264 FAX FILING CERTIFICATION BY FAX FILING AGENCY In compliance with RULE 2005, FILING THROUGH FAX FILING AGENCY, subsection (e), CERTIFICATION, this document certifies that I, Mary Galvin, have complied with the rules as stated under Rule 2.303. Filing through fax filing agency of the SPECIAL RULES FOR TRIAL COURTS, regarding filing documents by fax and that the document(s) to be filed. Specified in this certification is/are the full and unaltered facsimile-produced document(s) received by fax. Each of the specified document(s) that this certification pertains to are notated with the phrase “FAX FILING” immediately below the title of the document(s), and is/are specified as follows: Case Number: 127180 Case Management Statement _ The document(s) specified in this certification were received from the following authorizing agency: One Legal, Inc., on behalf of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP 1030 15" Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: July 26, 2007 Signature; Hendren Pro Legal Services Butte #113