Preview
i
FE 2 Vi: 094k (316) 445 p.2
[ATTORNEY OR PARTY WeTHOUT ATTORNEY (Nome, Stale Gar number, and adaronsy: CM-110
|Char leton 8. Pearse, SBN 122491 FOR COURT USE ONLY
Jéana B. Pipkin, SBN 208915
Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP
4030 15th Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, cA 95814
TELEPHONENO.: (916) 443-1030 FAX NO. (Optional): (916) 443-0869 Buite Count
S-+Ai ADDRESS (Oowmnay: Maxy Ann Rabo Schwe iger, Frederick Rabo, upener Court
c
TOR FOR Ronald R: Oo, Michael
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY iller
OF
street Adbress: 655 Oleander Avenue Butte FEB 14 200
wating appress: 655 Oleander Avenue
erry Ano zie coos: Chico, CA lock
Gatos
ar(jst
Qy2Koo
95926
BRANCH NAME: Do
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline,
et al.
JDEFENDANTRESPONDENT Jack
: Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
(Check one):
CASE NUMBER:
LX] UNLIMITED CASE (* umiteo case
(Amount demanded
exceeds $25,000)
(Amount demanded Is $25,000 | 127180
or less)
FAX Filing
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: February 24, 2006 Time:10:30 a.m. Dept: Coo Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address
above):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked
, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. [J This statement is submitted by party (name):
bv. CX] This statementis submitted Jointly by parties (names): Ronald Rabo,
Susan Miller, Michael
Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo
Complaint and cross-complaint {to be ans: wered
by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was fled on (date):
b. CX] The cross-compiaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 27, 2006
Service (to be answered by blaintifis and cross-complainants
only)
a. (3X) All partios name: cin the complaint and cross-complaint have been
served, or have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [7] The followingp: arties Named In the complaint or cross-compla
int
(ty have not been served (specify names and explai
n why not):
(2) (7? have been served but hava not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) (2) have had a defauit entered against them (specify names):
c. (2) The fotlowing additional parties may be added (specify names, aature
of involvement in case, anu the date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type of case In XJ complaint Cx cross-complaint (describe, including causes of action):
The complaint seeks partion of the
real p roperty and an injunction; The
cross-complaint seeks to partitio
n an add itional parcel of real property.
Fann Adopted for Mande Pogetafs
Judicial Council of Califomia CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Col. Rules of Cour,
CM-110 [Rov. January 1, 2005} 9 242
sits
Eob td. 200841: Sbfi
iST NATIONWIDE (916) 449-699] p 4 p.a
@
PLAINTIFFIPETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
4 b. Provide a brief statement of the case,
includin ig any damat ges. {if personal injury |
damages claimed, including Medical damages are Sought, spacify the injury and
expenses to date fin dicate source and amoun
earnings to date, and astima t], estimated future medical expenses,
ted future lost earnin gs. If equitable relief Is sought t, descri lost
The complaint seek S partion be (he nature of tha relief, )
of the real property and an
cross-complaint seeks to Partit injunction : The
ion an a dditional parcel of real property.
Ch (if more space is needed, check this box
and attach a page designated as Attachment
4b. )
Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request
{Ja jury tral Coa nonjury trial (if more than one party, provide the name of each
requestinga jury trial): Unknown at party
this time.
Trial date
a The trial has been set for (data):
b. C1 No trial date has been sel. This case will
be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the
not, explain): filing of the complaint if
¢, Dates on which parties or attom leys
will not be available for trial {specify dates
See Attachment 6c. and expiain reasons for unavailability):
Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the
trial will take (check one);
a. [X] days (specify number): 20
b. houre (short Causes) (specify):
8. Trial representation {to be answered
for each party)
The party or parties will be represented
at trial (3X) by the attomay or party listed in the caption
a Attorney: ("] by the following:
b. Firm:
¢. Address:
d. Telephone number:
e. Fax number:
f. E-mail address:
g. Party represented:
Additional representation is described
in Attachment 8.
Preference
J This case Is entitled to preference (spaci
ty code section):
10, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
a. Counsel (_] has (7 hes not provided the ADR information package Identified
reviewed AOR options with the client, in rule 201.9 to the client and has
6 CI All parties have agreed to a form of ADR.
ADR will be completed by (date):
c. J The case hes gone to an ADR proce
ss (indicate status):
M110 (Rev, January 3. 2008)
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pago 2 ot 4
a
:
Geb dd. 10g KEfi IST HAT idHU 1 4 aA )
{Wid ag 41
443- a6 Hal 54 D
p.4
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER.
[DEFENOANTIRESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
10. d. The party or parties are willin ig to participate
in (check all that apply):
(1) Madiation
@ C4 Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil
Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to close 15 days
arbitration under Cat. Rules of Court, rule 1612) before
(3) Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil
Procedure section 1141.12 (discove! ry to remain open
before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of until 30 days
Court, rule 1612)
(4) Co Binding judicial arbitration
(6) CD Binding private arbitration
(6) LJ Neutral case evaluation
MCI Other (specify):
@. [J This matter is subject to mandatos ¥y Judicial arbitration becaus
e the amount in controversy does not exceed the
Statutory limit.
f (7) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
Procedure section 1141.11, Clvil
g. (_] This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under
rule 1601(b) of the California Rules of Court (sp
ecify exemption):
11. Settlement conference
(3 The Party or parties are willing to Participate In an
early settlement conference (specify when):
12. Insurance
a. (J Insurance carrler, If any, for party filing this statem
ent (name):
b. Reservation of rights: (7 Yes m4 1 No
Cc. J Coverage issues will significantly affect resoiution
of this case (explain):
13. Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the
court's jurisdiction or processing of this case, and describ
e the status.
(7) Bankruptey |__j Other (specify):
Status:
14, Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a There are companion, underlying, or ralated cases.
(1 Name of case:
2) Name of court:
3) Case number:
4 Status:
Additional cases are described in Attachment
14a,
v. [5] Amotionto consolidate (1 coordinate will be filed by (name party):
15._Bifurcation
(_] The party or parties intend to file a mation
for an order bifurcating, severing, or Coordinating the followi
action (specify moving party, type of motion ng issues or causes of
, and reasons):
16. Other motions
X J The party or parties expect to fle the
following motions before trial (specify moving party, type
Unknown at this time : of motion, and issues):
GH-110 (Rew. vonvary 1, 2005)
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pege dof
aot b
“Feb.t4. 20 Qe HT GAR IST HATION¥IDE o) 4dg 5 221 6 p.S
. @ @
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER,
JDEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et at -}127280
17. Discovery
a. () The party or parties have completed all
discovery.
b. LX] The following discovery will be com pleted
by the date specifiad (describe all antici ‘ipated discovery}:
Party Descriptio
Counsel has not yet had
Date
an Depositions
opportunity to review March 2007
the
file to determine the
Written Discovery
extent of discovery which March 2007
will need to be undertake
n.
c. [i The following discovery issues are antic
ipated (specify):
18. Economic Litigation
a. This is a limited civil case (1.e., the amount
of Civili Procedure sections 90 through
demani ded is $25,000 or lass} ) and the economic
98 will appl ly to this case, litigation Procedures in Code
6. (J) This is a limited civil case and a
motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigat
discovery will be filed (if checked, explain ion procedures or for additlonat
should not apply to th WS Case): Spacifically why econo mic litigation procedures relating to discovery
or trial
19. Other issues
The party or parties ra quest that the
following additional matters be considered
conference (specify): or determines at the case management
20. Meet and confer
a. The party or parties h: ave met
and conferred with all parties on all subjects requir
Court (if nat, explain) : ed by rule 212 of the California Rules of
b, After meetin 9 and conferring as required by rule 212
of the Califomia Rules of Court, the partie
(specify): s agree on the following
21. Case management orders
Previous case Management orders
in this case are (check one).
(Xj none attached as Attachment 27.
22. Total number ot pages attached (if any):
2
aaa ly famitiar with this case and will ba ful
tatement, and wi i possess the author ly
conference, including the writte: Nn authority
Prepared to discuss the sta! tus of discovery and
i ity to enter Into stipulations of in these issues
of the Party where required,
ADR, as well as othar issues
at the time of the case Management
Date: February 13, 2006
?
Charleton $. Pearse
{TYPE OR PRINT NAME) b SELLE”
(SIGNATUREOF RYY OR ATTORNEN)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) >
{SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
Additional signetures are attached
Cn4-470 (Rav. Jenvaray 1, 2005)
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Page aorta
- +
F@st.ds 2006 Di: 1GAN tl HE (2pB) dag-299)
Boo! ito u p-&
ATTACHMENT 6.c
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CASE NAME: Edward ine, et al. vs. Ji eline, et al
COURT AND CASE NUMBER: Butte
County Superior Court Case Nos.:127180
02/24/06: SETTLEMENT CONFEREN CE
@ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 2
G ill man F,Family
il Limited Partnership, et al, vs. B&G
Mechanical, Inc., et al.
Amador County Superior Court Case No.:
04-CV-322 4
02/24/06 TRIAL CALL (7 days) @ 8:30 am,
Dept. 19
Rudy Ki ing vs. ‘oy Anthony Clemo etal.
Sonoma County Superior Court Case
No.: SCV235473
02/27/06 SETTLEMENT CONFEREN CE @
8:30 a.m., Dept. 21
David Hernandez, et al. v. Dani el Lee, -D., et al.
Stanislaus County Superior Court Case
No. 353060
03/14/06 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 21
David Hem lez, et al. v. Daniel Lee, M.D. .
Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No.
353060
03/28/06 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept, 2
Gillman Famil imit P. ip, et al. vs. B&G Mech:
Asnador County Superior Court Case No.:
04-CV-3224
04/05/06 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @
9:00 a.m., Dept. B
cecounty of Sutter, et al. v. William Swee
t
Sutter County Superior Court Case No.: CVCS03-2
010
04/06/06 SETTLEMENT CONFEREN CE @ 8:30
a.m., Dept. 59
Teresa Dow-H. ilton vs. Virco Manufacturing.C. . etal.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.:
03AS03726
04/24/06 TRIAL (20 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Teresa Dow-! ilton vs. Virco Manufacturing Corp., et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 0348
03726
04/26/06. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30
p.m, Dept. 59
Carol D’Albora, et al. vs. Katrina Anne Blair, et
al,
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 04A$
91880
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT. STATE
MENT, Page 1 of 2
Pes dd. 200b 11: TMAH i ATIONWIDE (318) 449 p.?
. @
05/15/06 TRIAL READINESS CONFERE NCE @
2:00 p.m, Dept. B
Ci countyity of Sutter, etetal,al v. Williayim Sweet
Sutter County Superior Court Case No.:
CVCS03-2010
05/16/05 TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. B
County of Sutter, et al. v. William Swee
t
Sutter County Superior Court Case No,:
CVCS03-2010
05/23/06 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47
Carol D’Albora, et al. . Katrina Ann
air, et al.
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.:
04AS01880
07/10/06 SETTLEMENT CONFERENC E @ 3:00
p.m., Dept. C
Les Schwab Tire Cory vs. Timber! e Tree Service, et al.
Mendocino County Superior Court Case No.: SCUK
CVPM 0595141
08/10/06 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 3:00
p.m., Dept, E
Les Schwab Tire mpan} s. Timberlake Tree S. ice, et al
Mendocino County Superior Court Case No.:
SCUK CVPM 059514]
08/14/06 TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:30 a.m., Dept. E
Les Schwab Tire Com vs, Ti ber]: ¢ Tree Service, et al.
Mendocino County Superior Court Case
No.: SCUK CVPM 0595141
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEME
NT STATEMENT, Page 2 of 2
——
Fecha. uo N11 0AM iSt fv E (96) 449-9991 ~ p.8
e e
Edward Richard Meline, et al. y. Jac
Butte County Sup erior Court Case k Meline, et al,
No. 127180
PROOF OF SERVICE
1, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and
state that I am over the age of eighteen
years, employed
in the County of Sacramento, Californ
ia, and not a party to the within
action. My business address is
1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sac
ramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily
Practice of the law offices of Lena
han, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP,
of collectin: Zz and processing of
correspondence for mailing with the Unit
ed States Postal Service.
On the date below, I served the CAS
E MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following
patties:
10
Nels A. Christensen
11 Christensen & Schwartz, LLP
James B. Berglund William A, Ward
1 Governors Lane Attomey at Law
1838 Feather River Blvd. Attomey at Law
12 Chico, CA 95926 9 Williamsburg Lane
Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926
13 Richard L. Crabtree
Attomey at Law
John Jeffrey Carter
I4 1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 Attomey at Law
P.O. Box 3606
Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95927
15
16 x (BY MAIL ) Iplaced each such sealed envelope
, with
17
mail, for co llection and mailing on the parties
in sai de stage
action.
thereon fully prepaid for first-class
(BY CERTIFIED MAIL ) I placed each such
18 prepaid for certified mail, re turn, sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully
receipt requested, for collectio n and mailing on the parties!
in said action.
19
(BY PERSONAL SERVIC E) I personally delive
20 red by hand said documents to theaddressee(s)
noted above.
2] (BY FACSIMILE) Icaused the said document(s) to be
number(s) hereafter. transmitted by facsimile to the telephond
22
(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and
23 scaled envelope and deposited in the Federal Expres.co rrect copy of the within document(s) in a
s depository for ovemight mail.
24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of
the State of California th: at the foregoing is
25 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed
on February i 2006 in Sacramento, California.
26
27
28
Proof of Service
° A&S Legal sevice
2
iA) Butte County #74
309 Wall Street, Chico, CA 95928
Lf (530) 895-8516 e
Fax (530) 894-1079
CERTIFICATION
FAX FILING BY AGENCY
In compliance with RULE 2005, FILING THROUGH FAX FILING AGENCY,
subsection (e), CERTIFICATION, this document certifies that I, Diane M.
Azevedo, have complied with the rules as stated under RULE 2005 of the
SPECIAL RULES FOR TRIAL COURTS, regarding filing documents by fax and
that the document(s) to be filed. Specified in this certification is/are the full and
unaltered facsimile-produced document(s) received by fax.
Each of the specified document(s) that this certification pertains to are notated
with the phrase “FAX Filing” immediately below the title of the document(s), and
is/are specified as follows:
Case Number: 127180
Case Management Statement
The document(s) specified in this certification were received from the following
authorizing agency:
First Nationwide Legal, on behalf of
Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP
1030 15‘ Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: February 14, 2006
Butte County #74
Preview
i FE 2 Vi: 094k (316) 445 p.2 [ATTORNEY OR PARTY WeTHOUT ATTORNEY (Nome, Stale Gar number, and adaronsy: CM-110 |Char leton 8. Pearse, SBN 122491 FOR COURT USE ONLY Jéana B. Pipkin, SBN 208915 Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP 4030 15th Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, cA 95814 TELEPHONENO.: (916) 443-1030 FAX NO. (Optional): (916) 443-0869 Buite Count S-+Ai ADDRESS (Oowmnay: Maxy Ann Rabo Schwe iger, Frederick Rabo, upener Court c TOR FOR Ronald R: Oo, Michael SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY iller OF street Adbress: 655 Oleander Avenue Butte FEB 14 200 wating appress: 655 Oleander Avenue erry Ano zie coos: Chico, CA lock Gatos ar(jst Qy2Koo 95926 BRANCH NAME: Do PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. JDEFENDANTRESPONDENT Jack : Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Check one): CASE NUMBER: LX] UNLIMITED CASE (* umiteo case (Amount demanded exceeds $25,000) (Amount demanded Is $25,000 | 127180 or less) FAX Filing A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: February 24, 2006 Time:10:30 a.m. Dept: Coo Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked , and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. [J This statement is submitted by party (name): bv. CX] This statementis submitted Jointly by parties (names): Ronald Rabo, Susan Miller, Michael Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Rabo Complaint and cross-complaint {to be ans: wered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was fled on (date): b. CX] The cross-compiaint, if any, was filed on (date): December 27, 2006 Service (to be answered by blaintifis and cross-complainants only) a. (3X) All partios name: cin the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, or have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [7] The followingp: arties Named In the complaint or cross-compla int (ty have not been served (specify names and explai n why not): (2) (7? have been served but hava not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) (2) have had a defauit entered against them (specify names): c. (2) The fotlowing additional parties may be added (specify names, aature of involvement in case, anu the date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case In XJ complaint Cx cross-complaint (describe, including causes of action): The complaint seeks partion of the real p roperty and an injunction; The cross-complaint seeks to partitio n an add itional parcel of real property. Fann Adopted for Mande Pogetafs Judicial Council of Califomia CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Col. Rules of Cour, CM-110 [Rov. January 1, 2005} 9 242 sits Eob td. 200841: Sbfi iST NATIONWIDE (916) 449-699] p 4 p.a @ PLAINTIFFIPETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 4 b. Provide a brief statement of the case, includin ig any damat ges. {if personal injury | damages claimed, including Medical damages are Sought, spacify the injury and expenses to date fin dicate source and amoun earnings to date, and astima t], estimated future medical expenses, ted future lost earnin gs. If equitable relief Is sought t, descri lost The complaint seek S partion be (he nature of tha relief, ) of the real property and an cross-complaint seeks to Partit injunction : The ion an a dditional parcel of real property. Ch (if more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b. ) Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request {Ja jury tral Coa nonjury trial (if more than one party, provide the name of each requestinga jury trial): Unknown at party this time. Trial date a The trial has been set for (data): b. C1 No trial date has been sel. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the not, explain): filing of the complaint if ¢, Dates on which parties or attom leys will not be available for trial {specify dates See Attachment 6c. and expiain reasons for unavailability): Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one); a. [X] days (specify number): 20 b. houre (short Causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation {to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial (3X) by the attomay or party listed in the caption a Attorney: ("] by the following: b. Firm: ¢. Address: d. Telephone number: e. Fax number: f. E-mail address: g. Party represented: Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. Preference J This case Is entitled to preference (spaci ty code section): 10, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a. Counsel (_] has (7 hes not provided the ADR information package Identified reviewed AOR options with the client, in rule 201.9 to the client and has 6 CI All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be completed by (date): c. J The case hes gone to an ADR proce ss (indicate status): M110 (Rev, January 3. 2008) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pago 2 ot 4 a : Geb dd. 10g KEfi IST HAT idHU 1 4 aA ) {Wid ag 41 443- a6 Hal 54 D p.4 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER. [DEFENOANTIRESPONDENT:Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 10. d. The party or parties are willin ig to participate in (check all that apply): (1) Madiation @ C4 Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discovery to close 15 days arbitration under Cat. Rules of Court, rule 1612) before (3) Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.12 (discove! ry to remain open before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of until 30 days Court, rule 1612) (4) Co Binding judicial arbitration (6) CD Binding private arbitration (6) LJ Neutral case evaluation MCI Other (specify): @. [J This matter is subject to mandatos ¥y Judicial arbitration becaus e the amount in controversy does not exceed the Statutory limit. f (7) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Procedure section 1141.11, Clvil g. (_] This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 1601(b) of the California Rules of Court (sp ecify exemption): 11. Settlement conference (3 The Party or parties are willing to Participate In an early settlement conference (specify when): 12. Insurance a. (J Insurance carrler, If any, for party filing this statem ent (name): b. Reservation of rights: (7 Yes m4 1 No Cc. J Coverage issues will significantly affect resoiution of this case (explain): 13. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case, and describ e the status. (7) Bankruptey |__j Other (specify): Status: 14, Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a There are companion, underlying, or ralated cases. (1 Name of case: 2) Name of court: 3) Case number: 4 Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a, v. [5] Amotionto consolidate (1 coordinate will be filed by (name party): 15._Bifurcation (_] The party or parties intend to file a mation for an order bifurcating, severing, or Coordinating the followi action (specify moving party, type of motion ng issues or causes of , and reasons): 16. Other motions X J The party or parties expect to fle the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type Unknown at this time : of motion, and issues): GH-110 (Rew. vonvary 1, 2005) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pege dof aot b “Feb.t4. 20 Qe HT GAR IST HATION¥IDE o) 4dg 5 221 6 p.S . @ @ PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER, JDEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et at -}127280 17. Discovery a. () The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. LX] The following discovery will be com pleted by the date specifiad (describe all antici ‘ipated discovery}: Party Descriptio Counsel has not yet had Date an Depositions opportunity to review March 2007 the file to determine the Written Discovery extent of discovery which March 2007 will need to be undertake n. c. [i The following discovery issues are antic ipated (specify): 18. Economic Litigation a. This is a limited civil case (1.e., the amount of Civili Procedure sections 90 through demani ded is $25,000 or lass} ) and the economic 98 will appl ly to this case, litigation Procedures in Code 6. (J) This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigat discovery will be filed (if checked, explain ion procedures or for additlonat should not apply to th WS Case): Spacifically why econo mic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial 19. Other issues The party or parties ra quest that the following additional matters be considered conference (specify): or determines at the case management 20. Meet and confer a. The party or parties h: ave met and conferred with all parties on all subjects requir Court (if nat, explain) : ed by rule 212 of the California Rules of b, After meetin 9 and conferring as required by rule 212 of the Califomia Rules of Court, the partie (specify): s agree on the following 21. Case management orders Previous case Management orders in this case are (check one). (Xj none attached as Attachment 27. 22. Total number ot pages attached (if any): 2 aaa ly famitiar with this case and will ba ful tatement, and wi i possess the author ly conference, including the writte: Nn authority Prepared to discuss the sta! tus of discovery and i ity to enter Into stipulations of in these issues of the Party where required, ADR, as well as othar issues at the time of the case Management Date: February 13, 2006 ? Charleton $. Pearse {TYPE OR PRINT NAME) b SELLE” (SIGNATUREOF RYY OR ATTORNEN) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) > {SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signetures are attached Cn4-470 (Rav. Jenvaray 1, 2005) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page aorta - + F@st.ds 2006 Di: 1GAN tl HE (2pB) dag-299) Boo! ito u p-& ATTACHMENT 6.c CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NAME: Edward ine, et al. vs. Ji eline, et al COURT AND CASE NUMBER: Butte County Superior Court Case Nos.:127180 02/24/06: SETTLEMENT CONFEREN CE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 2 G ill man F,Family il Limited Partnership, et al, vs. B&G Mechanical, Inc., et al. Amador County Superior Court Case No.: 04-CV-322 4 02/24/06 TRIAL CALL (7 days) @ 8:30 am, Dept. 19 Rudy Ki ing vs. ‘oy Anthony Clemo etal. Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV235473 02/27/06 SETTLEMENT CONFEREN CE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 21 David Hernandez, et al. v. Dani el Lee, -D., et al. Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No. 353060 03/14/06 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 21 David Hem lez, et al. v. Daniel Lee, M.D. . Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No. 353060 03/28/06 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept, 2 Gillman Famil imit P. ip, et al. vs. B&G Mech: Asnador County Superior Court Case No.: 04-CV-3224 04/05/06 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. B cecounty of Sutter, et al. v. William Swee t Sutter County Superior Court Case No.: CVCS03-2 010 04/06/06 SETTLEMENT CONFEREN CE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 Teresa Dow-H. ilton vs. Virco Manufacturing.C. . etal. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 03AS03726 04/24/06 TRIAL (20 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Teresa Dow-! ilton vs. Virco Manufacturing Corp., et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 0348 03726 04/26/06. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m, Dept. 59 Carol D’Albora, et al. vs. Katrina Anne Blair, et al, Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 04A$ 91880 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT. STATE MENT, Page 1 of 2 Pes dd. 200b 11: TMAH i ATIONWIDE (318) 449 p.? . @ 05/15/06 TRIAL READINESS CONFERE NCE @ 2:00 p.m, Dept. B Ci countyity of Sutter, etetal,al v. Williayim Sweet Sutter County Superior Court Case No.: CVCS03-2010 05/16/05 TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. B County of Sutter, et al. v. William Swee t Sutter County Superior Court Case No,: CVCS03-2010 05/23/06 TRIAL (7 days) @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 47 Carol D’Albora, et al. . Katrina Ann air, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 04AS01880 07/10/06 SETTLEMENT CONFERENC E @ 3:00 p.m., Dept. C Les Schwab Tire Cory vs. Timber! e Tree Service, et al. Mendocino County Superior Court Case No.: SCUK CVPM 0595141 08/10/06 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 3:00 p.m., Dept, E Les Schwab Tire mpan} s. Timberlake Tree S. ice, et al Mendocino County Superior Court Case No.: SCUK CVPM 059514] 08/14/06 TRIAL (5 days) @ 9:30 a.m., Dept. E Les Schwab Tire Com vs, Ti ber]: ¢ Tree Service, et al. Mendocino County Superior Court Case No.: SCUK CVPM 0595141 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEME NT STATEMENT, Page 2 of 2 —— Fecha. uo N11 0AM iSt fv E (96) 449-9991 ~ p.8 e e Edward Richard Meline, et al. y. Jac Butte County Sup erior Court Case k Meline, et al, No. 127180 PROOF OF SERVICE 1, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed in the County of Sacramento, Californ ia, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sac ramento, California 95814. I am readily familiar with the daily Practice of the law offices of Lena han, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collectin: Zz and processing of correspondence for mailing with the Unit ed States Postal Service. On the date below, I served the CAS E MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, on the following patties: 10 Nels A. Christensen 11 Christensen & Schwartz, LLP James B. Berglund William A, Ward 1 Governors Lane Attomey at Law 1838 Feather River Blvd. Attomey at Law 12 Chico, CA 95926 9 Williamsburg Lane Oroville, CA 95965 Chico, CA 95926 13 Richard L. Crabtree Attomey at Law John Jeffrey Carter I4 1395 Ridgewood Drive, Suite 300 Attomey at Law P.O. Box 3606 Chico, CA 95973 Chico, CA 95927 15 16 x (BY MAIL ) Iplaced each such sealed envelope , with 17 mail, for co llection and mailing on the parties in sai de stage action. thereon fully prepaid for first-class (BY CERTIFIED MAIL ) I placed each such 18 prepaid for certified mail, re turn, sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully receipt requested, for collectio n and mailing on the parties! in said action. 19 (BY PERSONAL SERVIC E) I personally delive 20 red by hand said documents to theaddressee(s) noted above. 2] (BY FACSIMILE) Icaused the said document(s) to be number(s) hereafter. transmitted by facsimile to the telephond 22 (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I placed a true and 23 scaled envelope and deposited in the Federal Expres.co rrect copy of the within document(s) in a s depository for ovemight mail. 24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California th: at the foregoing is 25 true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on February i 2006 in Sacramento, California. 26 27 28 Proof of Service ° A&S Legal sevice 2 iA) Butte County #74 309 Wall Street, Chico, CA 95928 Lf (530) 895-8516 e Fax (530) 894-1079 CERTIFICATION FAX FILING BY AGENCY In compliance with RULE 2005, FILING THROUGH FAX FILING AGENCY, subsection (e), CERTIFICATION, this document certifies that I, Diane M. Azevedo, have complied with the rules as stated under RULE 2005 of the SPECIAL RULES FOR TRIAL COURTS, regarding filing documents by fax and that the document(s) to be filed. Specified in this certification is/are the full and unaltered facsimile-produced document(s) received by fax. Each of the specified document(s) that this certification pertains to are notated with the phrase “FAX Filing” immediately below the title of the document(s), and is/are specified as follows: Case Number: 127180 Case Management Statement The document(s) specified in this certification were received from the following authorizing agency: First Nationwide Legal, on behalf of Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse, LLP 1030 15‘ Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: February 14, 2006 Butte County #74