Answer: Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                FEB 03 2006.
“4
                               ®
                   Law Office of
           WILLIAM            A. WARD
             A PROFESSIONAL   CORPORATION
                STATE    BAR NO. 37059
              #9 WILLIAMSBURG      LANE
            CHICO,     CALIFORNIA  95926
                    (530) 342-2225
                                                                                   Sagat
                                                                                     Suis
          Attorney for Cross-Defendants,                                          E FEB 032005 &
          VIOLET ARLENE MELINE, ‘STEPHEN MELINE Iv,
          ROBERT J. MELINE, NELDA F. JESSEE and
          MELANIE G. EDGINGTON

                                 SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                             FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE
     10   EDWARD   RICHARD    MELINE and                             Case No.   127180 A
          CHARLENE   M.  ‘MELINE,  Trustees
     ll   under   the Edward       Richard   Meline        and
          Charlene M. Melinae Revocable Living
     12   Trust dated December 30, 1992.
     13                                      Plaintiffs,

     14           VS.

     15   JACK MELINE,          SHARON MELINE,
          DOROTHY MAY RABO, the testate and
     16   intestate   successors and all persons
          claiming by, through or under FRED A
     17   RABO,      deceased,   VIOLET ARLENE
          MELINE,         STEPHEN     MELINE,     IV
     18   ROBERT        J    MELINE,     NELDA     F
          JESSEE, MELANIE G. EDGINGTON
     19   the testate and intestate successors and all
          persons claiming by, through or under
     20   DAVID L. MELINE, MELINE & RABO
          FARMS, INC., a California corporation
     21   and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
     22                                      Defendants
     23
          AND RELATED CROSS- ACTION                                  Case No.   127180 B

                                                                     Case No. 127180 C
          AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION.                                  ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT
                                                                     FOR PARTITION AND DISSOLU-
     26                                                              TION OF THE CORPORATION


          Answer to Cross-Complaint for Partition and Dissolution of the Corporation
                                                                 1

e                                            @
                                COMES NOW, VIOLET ARLENE MELINE, STEPHEN MELINE IV, ROBERT

                     J. MELINE, NELDA F. JESSEE and MELANIE G. EDGINGTON and answer the
                     Cross-Complaint filed herein by Ron Rabo, Michael Rabo, Nick Rabo, Mary Rabo

                     Schweiger and Sue Miller, as follows:

                                1    In answer to Paragraph 5, these answering Cross-Defendants have no

                     information and belief that partition by sale of the property commonly referred to the

                     “Adobe” is more equitable than division in kind and basing their denial thereon, deny the

                     allegations of Paragraph 5.

                                2    In answer to Paragraph 9, Cross-Defendants admit the allegations
                10   thereof, except to deny that the business of the Corporation can no longer be conducted to

                1    an advantage.

                12              3    In answer to Paragraph 11, these answering Cross-Defendants have no

                13   information or belief sufficient to enable them to admit the allegations of Paragraph 11,
     Sa
     BO
‘SBs HOSS       14   and basing their denial on such lack of information and belief, deny all the allegations
         ee
  59)    SEN
         ‘m0n
     gee OLS    15   thereof.
         a2
         i