Preview
81/20/2885 15:54 9164438869 MCMURCHIE PAGE 62/89
@
2
ATTORNEYOR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY
|Charleton S. Pearse, (NatSBN% a 3348 ‘Bar number,r ead aclarse):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
CM-110
Vicki E. Harti an, SNB_ 170307 1
McMurchie, Wei 1, Lenehan, i
1030 Fifteenth Str eet, SuiteLee,300 Slater & Pearse,
Sacramento, CA 95 614
THLEPHONE NO.: (916) 443-1030
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Options): Mary FAXNO, (Optional: (916) 443-0869 7 SaaS F
Ann Rabo § chweiger, Frederick Rabo, |
E v4
ATTORNEY Ft
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUN Susan xr
sTReeTappRESss: 655
TY
Oleander Avenue
OF Bue te
E JN 20 2005
MalLinG aopRess: 655 Oleander Avenue ‘ee
cry ano zip cove: Chico,
BRANCH NAME:
CA 95926 Aa} Buty
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al.
DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT
Jack
: Meline and Sharon Meline, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
(Check one):
CASE NUMBER;
[X] UNLIMITED CASE 1_] LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 | 127180
excesds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as
follows:
Date: February 3, 2005 Time: 1:30 Dept: TBA Div: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must ba checked, |, and
the specified Information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. |] This statement is submitted by party (name);
b. LX This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Ronal
d Rabo , Susan Miller, Michael
Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Ra bo
Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be ansi wered by plaintiffs
and cross-complainants only)
a The complaint was filed on (date):
b. [J] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. "_] Allparties named in the com iplaint and cross-complaint hava been served, or have
appeared, or have been dismissed,
b. [2] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [7] have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have net been
dismissed (specify names):
(3) (C1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
e The following additional parties ma y be added (specify
names, nature of involvement In case, and the date by
they may be served); which
Description of case
a. Type of case in |X } complaint (2) cross-comptaint (describe, including causes of action):
The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction;
cross-complaint seeks The
to partition an additional parcel of real prop erty,
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Page tof ¢
Judietal Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Gal. Rulas of Court,
CM=110 {Now July 1, 2002] sule 212
01/20/05 THU 15:52 (TX/RX NO 8836] (002
1/20/2085 15:54 9164430863 MCMURCHIE PAGE 63/89
@ @
*
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONEREGwaxd Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER: .
| DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon
J
Meline,et al. 127180
4. b, Provide a brief statement of the case, including
any damages. (If personal injury dam ages
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date are Sought, specify the injury and
earnings to date, and estimated futu ire [indicate source and mount), estimated
lost eamings. If equitable relief is sought, future medical expenses, lost
Counsel for the Rabas have just des cribe the nature of the reliof )
been retained and h ave not
entirety of the file, A formal substitution of att yet reviewed the
the near future. A substantial amount of time will orneys will be filed in
voluminous amount of documents be needed to review the
received to date.
C4 {if more space is needed, check this box and attach
a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request. Cj ajurytrial [.] a nonjury trial (if more than one party, provide the name of each
requesti
a jury ng
trial): Unknown at party
this time,
Trial date
a. [_] The trial has been set for (date):
b. |" | No trial date has been set, This case will be re: ady for trial
within 12 months of the date of the filin 1g of the complaint (if
not, explain): Counsel for the Rab:
iO parties
substantial amount of time wi 11 be needehas d
just been retaine dd.
¢. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be availab le for trial to review the file and issues.
(specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
Please see Attachment 6.c.
Estimated langth of trial
Tha party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check ong):
a. "| days (specify number): Unknown at this time.
b. hours (short causes) (specify):
Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial
[X_ by the attomey or party listed in the caption { ~] by the following:
Attorney:
Firm:
Address:
Telephone number:
Fax number:
E-mail address:
Party represented:
i Additlonal representation is described in Attachment 8,
Preferance
: _. This case is entitled to preference (specify code section)
:
10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
a. Counsel ([1 hes [3 has not provided the ADR information package identified
reviewed ADR options with the client. in rule 201.9 to the cilent and has
{1 All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be comple
ted by (date):
(7") The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status):
(CM-110 [Now July 1, 2002)
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pago 2 of 4
01/20/05 THU 15:52 [TX/RX NO 8836] 003
61/20/2885 15:54 9164438863 MCMURCHIE PAGE 84/89
e
.
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONEREGward
| DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Jack Meline
Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER; +
and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
10. d. The party or parties are willin ig to participate
in (check aif that apply):
(4). Mediation
acd Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil
arbitration under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1612) Procedi lure section 1141,12 (discovery to close 15 days before
8 CI Nonbinding Judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure se ction 1141.12
before trial; order required under Cal, Rules of Court, (discovery to remain open until 30 days
rule 1612)
4) 4 Binding judicial arbitration
6) Ci Binding private arbitration
®™ oI Neutral case evaluation
[2 Other (specify):
e. [__] This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the
amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit.
f. [J Plaintiff elects to refer this case to Judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recover
y to the amount specified in Code of Civil
Procedure section 1141.11,
g. [11 This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 1600.5 of the Californi
a Rules of Court (specify exemption):
1 Settlement conterance
! The party or partias are willing to Participate in an early settleme
nt conference (specify when):
12. Insurance
a. (“7 Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (neme):
b. Reservation of rights: (7 ' Yes C71 No
c. [. 7] Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
13, Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the court's Jurisdiction or processi
ng of this case, and describe the status.
__j Bankruptcy 1 __] Other (specify):
Status;
14, Ralated cases, consolidation, and coordination
a There are com, panion, underlying, or related cases.
1 lame of case:
2" Name of court:
3 Case number:
4 ) Status:
(1 Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a.
b. 2) Amotion to iL] consolidate __J coordinate will be filed by (name party):
15. Bifurcation
| ~]] The party or parties intend to file @ motion for an order bifurcating,
severing, Or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons)
:
16. Other motions
The party or partles expect to file the followin: Ig motions before
trlal (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues)
Unknown at this time. :
‘CM+110 [New July 1, 2002)
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 3 of
01/20/05 THU 15:52 ITX/RX NO 8836] (goo
@1/20/2885 15:54 31 54430863 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 65/49
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richar
d Meline,
e
et al. GASE NUMBER:
| DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline
and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180
17. Discovery
a. L’_] The panty or parties have completed all
discovery,
6. Xx] ine following discovery will be completed
by the date specified (describe alf anti icipated
Party discovery):
Counsel has not yet had an
Description Date
opportunity to review the
file to determine the
extent of discovery which
will need to be undertaken.
c. [2 The following discovery Issues are anticipated
(specify):
18 Economie Litigation
a. |__| This is a Ilmited civil case (.e., the amount
demanded is $25, 000 or less) and tha economic litigat
of Civil Procedure section IS 90 through 98 will apply ion procedures In Code
to this ca:
b, | This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw
discovery will be filed (if checke
the case from the econ omic litigation procedures or
explain specifically why for additional
should not apply to this case): economic Hitigatic ion procedures relating to discov
ery or trial
19. Other issues
The party or parties re ‘quest that the follow
ing additional matters be considered or deter
conferencs (specify): mined at the case management
20. Meet and confer
a . The party or parties have met and conferred with
all partie
Court fifnot, explain): Counsel for the R: abo s on all subjects required by rule 212 of the California Rules of
parties h as just been retained
Counsel has not had an o; pportunity .
to review the voluminous
rece ived to date. documents
b. After meetin: ig and conferring as required by rule 212 of the
(specify): California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the follow
ing
21 Case management orders
Previous case management orders in this case are
(check one): ‘| none [J attached as Attachment 21.
22, Total numberof pages attached (if any): 3
| am completely familiar with this case and will be ful
raised by this statement, and will possess the lly prepa red to discuss the status of di iscovery
authority to enter into stipulations an these issues and ADR, as well as other issues
conference, including the written authority of the party at the time of the case management
where required,
Date: January 20, 2005
Vicks, Hartigan
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
> Ven. |
(SIGNATURE RTY OR ATTORNEY),
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) »
{SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
i] Additional signatures are attached
CNM-110 (New July 1, 2002)
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Pago 4 ors
01/20/05 THU 15:52 [TX/RX NO 8836] @005
1/28/2865 15:54 9164438869 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 66/89
@ ®
ATTACHMENT 6.¢
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CASE NAME: Edward Ric’ Meline,et _v. Jac! (eline, ef
COURT AND CASE NUMBER: Butte County Superior Court Case No.
127180
01/21/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. 8
Calavi 3 Cot Sut land Jenni
¢ and Michael Claus
Calaveras County Superior Court Case No. CV 29679
02/10/05: TRIAL @ 9:00 a,m., Dept. 6; 5 days
alaveras Count erland Moore) v. ifer Clause ai Michael Clau:;
Calaveras County Superior Court Case No. CV 29679
02/23/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59
Elizabeth Pidwerbecki v. Meli: cotti
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 024806368
03/08/05: TRIAL @ 8:30 a.m., De pt. 47; 5 days
jzabeth Pidw iv. Meli
Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 02AS06368
03/11/05; FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE, @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. WEO
2 er i v. Tim Woo) al.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No.: $C080735
03/25/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. Master Calendar
Chandra Thomas v. County of Placer
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV 15658
03/30/05: TRIAL, @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. WEO; 6 days
Kemper Primary v. Tim Woolley, et al.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No.: $C080735
04/05/05: TRIAL, Dept. Master Calendar; 17 days
Chandra Thomas v. County of Placer
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-15658
04/05/05: TRIAL; @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 2; 5 days (NO SETTLEMENT CONF.
SET)
ArT: av. con
Yolo County Superior Court Case NO. PM03-1640
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page
t of 3
01/20/05 THU 15:52 [TX/RX NO 8836} M006
(81/20/2685 15:54 9164430869 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 87/83
@ e
04/13/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 20
Jefferson/Janet fferson v. a J. Darl)
Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-226054
04/18/05 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. TBD
County o; evi vy. James t al.
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 69886
4/29/05: FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE, @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. G
lenas V. chnologi
Los Angeles County (Pomona) Superior Court Case No.:
KC041694
5/02/05: TRIAL, @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. G; 12 days
Gary Du is v.S. Cott hnologie:
Los Angeles County (Pomona) Superior Court Case No.: KC041 694
05/02/05; SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 11
i ich v. Der oultry,et
San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.: CV015399
05/06/05: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. TBD
Count Neva es Johns: et al.
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 69886
05/13/05; SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. Master Calendar
and v. ScottR a
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV 17231
05/16/05: TRIAL (7 days) @ 1:30 p.m., Dept.:11
obin. Ich v. Poult et al.
San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.: CV015399
05/17/05: TRIAL (17 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept.: TBD
County of Nevada v. James Johnston, et al.
Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 69886
05/19/05: TRIAL (3 weeks): @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 20; 10 days up to
three weeks
€ Jane: on Vv. _Darli
Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-226084.CV-3
068
05/24/05: TRIAL (17 days), Dept.:. Master Calendar
uben Herm: ct al, v. Scott Reuter, et al.
Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV 17231
05/25/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00a.m., Dept. Master Calendar
County of Sutter v. William Sweet
Sutter County Superior Court Case No.: CV CS 03-2063
ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT,
Page 2 of 3
01/20/05 THU 15:52 (TX/RX NO 8836] [007
(01/20/2005 15:54 9164430863 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 48/89
® @
07/12/05: TRIAL (7 days), Dept.: Master Calendar
Co of Sutterv. Willi Sweet
Sutter County Superior Court Case No.: CV CS 03-2063
07/22/05: TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 1:30p.m., Dept. 4
avel ion v. Co of.
Shasta County Superior Court Case No.: 144236
07/26/05: TRIAL (2 days), Dept.: Master Calendar
elk v. inty of Shasta
Shasta County Superior Court Case No.: 144236
08/23/05: TRIAL (5-8 days) Dept: TBD
Anita Tyree v. Michael John Gourley, et al,
Mariposa County Superior Court Case No.: 8145
ATTACHMENT 6.¢; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT,
Page3 of 3
01/20/05 THU 15:52 ITX/RX NO 8836] [go08
81/26/2085 15:54 9164430869 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 99/89
® ®
.
PROO
OF SERV
FICE
I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over
the age of eighteen years,
employed in the County of Sacramento, California, and not
a party to the within action. My
business address is 1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento
, California 95814, Iam readily
familiar with the daily practice of the Jaw offices of McMurchie,
Weill, Lenahan, Lee, Slater &
Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of correspondence for
mailing with the United States
Postal Service.
On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT
10 STATEMENT, on the
following parties:
I}
Nels A. Christensen John Jeffrey Carter
12 Christensen & Schwartz, LLP
1 jovernors Lane Attomey at Law
13 Chico, CA 95926 P.O. Box 3606
Chico, CA 95927
14 Richard L. Crabtree
William A. Ward
Attomey at Law Attomey at Law
15 34 Manzanita Court, Suite 110 9 Williamsburg Lane
Chico, Ca 95926 Chico, CA 95926
16
James B. Berglund
17 Attorney at Law
1639 Bird Street
18 Oroville, CA 95965
19
20
XX
§Birst-class mai P for collection and mailing on the patties in
'Y MAIL) I laced each such sealed envelope, with postage
thereon fully prepaid for
ran
said action.
21 (BYC FIED MAIL) I placed each such sealed envel
Prepai for certi ified ma’ 1:il, return receipt requested, for ope, with postage thereon full
collection and mailing on the
22 parties in said action.
23 (BY PERSONAL SER ‘VICE) I personally delivered by hand said docu
addressee(s) noted abov e. ments to the
24
(BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document
25 telephone number(s) indicated to the addressee(s)i(s) noted
to be transmitted by facsimile to the
above,
26 I declare under penalty of perjury under the
laws of the State of California that the
27 foregoing is true and correct, and that this decla
ration was executed on January 20, 2005 in
<
28 Sacramento, California.
DU
) AC)
gM Oe
Proof of Service
01/20/05 THU 15:52 (TX/RX NO 8836] [@oog9
Preview
81/20/2885 15:54 9164438869 MCMURCHIE PAGE 62/89 @ 2 ATTORNEYOR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY |Charleton S. Pearse, (NatSBN% a 3348 ‘Bar number,r ead aclarse): FOR COURT USE ONLY CM-110 Vicki E. Harti an, SNB_ 170307 1 McMurchie, Wei 1, Lenehan, i 1030 Fifteenth Str eet, SuiteLee,300 Slater & Pearse, Sacramento, CA 95 614 THLEPHONE NO.: (916) 443-1030 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Options): Mary FAXNO, (Optional: (916) 443-0869 7 SaaS F Ann Rabo § chweiger, Frederick Rabo, | E v4 ATTORNEY Ft SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUN Susan xr sTReeTappRESss: 655 TY Oleander Avenue OF Bue te E JN 20 2005 MalLinG aopRess: 655 Oleander Avenue ‘ee cry ano zip cove: Chico, BRANCH NAME: CA 95926 Aa} Buty PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richard Meline, et al. DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT Jack : Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Check one): CASE NUMBER; [X] UNLIMITED CASE 1_] LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 | 127180 excesds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: February 3, 2005 Time: 1:30 Dept: TBA Div: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must ba checked, |, and the specified Information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. |] This statement is submitted by party (name); b. LX This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Ronal d Rabo , Susan Miller, Michael Rabo, Mary Ann Rabo Schweiger and Frederick Ra bo Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be ansi wered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a The complaint was filed on (date): b. [J] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. "_] Allparties named in the com iplaint and cross-complaint hava been served, or have appeared, or have been dismissed, b. [2] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [7] have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have net been dismissed (specify names): (3) (C1 have had a default entered against them (specify names): e The following additional parties ma y be added (specify names, nature of involvement In case, and the date by they may be served); which Description of case a. Type of case in |X } complaint (2) cross-comptaint (describe, including causes of action): The complaint seeks partion of the real property and an injunction; cross-complaint seeks The to partition an additional parcel of real prop erty, Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Page tof ¢ Judietal Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Gal. Rulas of Court, CM=110 {Now July 1, 2002] sule 212 01/20/05 THU 15:52 (TX/RX NO 8836] (002 1/20/2085 15:54 9164430863 MCMURCHIE PAGE 63/89 @ @ * PLAINTIFF/PETITIONEREGwaxd Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER: . | DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon J Meline,et al. 127180 4. b, Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury dam ages damages claimed, including medical expenses to date are Sought, specify the injury and earnings to date, and estimated futu ire [indicate source and mount), estimated lost eamings. If equitable relief is sought, future medical expenses, lost Counsel for the Rabas have just des cribe the nature of the reliof ) been retained and h ave not entirety of the file, A formal substitution of att yet reviewed the the near future. A substantial amount of time will orneys will be filed in voluminous amount of documents be needed to review the received to date. C4 {if more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request. Cj ajurytrial [.] a nonjury trial (if more than one party, provide the name of each requesti a jury ng trial): Unknown at party this time, Trial date a. [_] The trial has been set for (date): b. |" | No trial date has been set, This case will be re: ady for trial within 12 months of the date of the filin 1g of the complaint (if not, explain): Counsel for the Rab: iO parties substantial amount of time wi 11 be needehas d just been retaine dd. ¢. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be availab le for trial to review the file and issues. (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): Please see Attachment 6.c. Estimated langth of trial Tha party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check ong): a. "| days (specify number): Unknown at this time. b. hours (short causes) (specify): Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial [X_ by the attomey or party listed in the caption { ~] by the following: Attorney: Firm: Address: Telephone number: Fax number: E-mail address: Party represented: i Additlonal representation is described in Attachment 8, Preferance : _. This case is entitled to preference (specify code section) : 10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a. Counsel ([1 hes [3 has not provided the ADR information package identified reviewed ADR options with the client. in rule 201.9 to the cilent and has {1 All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be comple ted by (date): (7") The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status): (CM-110 [Now July 1, 2002) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pago 2 of 4 01/20/05 THU 15:52 [TX/RX NO 8836] 003 61/20/2885 15:54 9164438863 MCMURCHIE PAGE 84/89 e . PLAINTIFF/PETITIONEREGward | DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Jack Meline Richard Meline, et al. CASE NUMBER; + and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 10. d. The party or parties are willin ig to participate in (check aif that apply): (4). Mediation acd Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil arbitration under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1612) Procedi lure section 1141,12 (discovery to close 15 days before 8 CI Nonbinding Judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure se ction 1141.12 before trial; order required under Cal, Rules of Court, (discovery to remain open until 30 days rule 1612) 4) 4 Binding judicial arbitration 6) Ci Binding private arbitration ®™ oI Neutral case evaluation [2 Other (specify): e. [__] This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. f. [J Plaintiff elects to refer this case to Judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recover y to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11, g. [11 This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 1600.5 of the Californi a Rules of Court (specify exemption): 1 Settlement conterance ! The party or partias are willing to Participate in an early settleme nt conference (specify when): 12. Insurance a. (“7 Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (neme): b. Reservation of rights: (7 ' Yes C71 No c. [. 7] Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 13, Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's Jurisdiction or processi ng of this case, and describe the status. __j Bankruptcy 1 __] Other (specify): Status; 14, Ralated cases, consolidation, and coordination a There are com, panion, underlying, or related cases. 1 lame of case: 2" Name of court: 3 Case number: 4 ) Status: (1 Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a. b. 2) Amotion to iL] consolidate __J coordinate will be filed by (name party): 15. Bifurcation | ~]] The party or parties intend to file @ motion for an order bifurcating, severing, Or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons) : 16. Other motions The party or partles expect to file the followin: Ig motions before trlal (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues) Unknown at this time. : ‘CM+110 [New July 1, 2002) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 3 of 01/20/05 THU 15:52 ITX/RX NO 8836] (goo @1/20/2885 15:54 31 54430863 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 65/49 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Edward Richar d Meline, e et al. GASE NUMBER: | DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jack Meline and Sharon Meline, et al. 127180 17. Discovery a. L’_] The panty or parties have completed all discovery, 6. Xx] ine following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe alf anti icipated Party discovery): Counsel has not yet had an Description Date opportunity to review the file to determine the extent of discovery which will need to be undertaken. c. [2 The following discovery Issues are anticipated (specify): 18 Economie Litigation a. |__| This is a Ilmited civil case (.e., the amount demanded is $25, 000 or less) and tha economic litigat of Civil Procedure section IS 90 through 98 will apply ion procedures In Code to this ca: b, | This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw discovery will be filed (if checke the case from the econ omic litigation procedures or explain specifically why for additional should not apply to this case): economic Hitigatic ion procedures relating to discov ery or trial 19. Other issues The party or parties re ‘quest that the follow ing additional matters be considered or deter conferencs (specify): mined at the case management 20. Meet and confer a . The party or parties have met and conferred with all partie Court fifnot, explain): Counsel for the R: abo s on all subjects required by rule 212 of the California Rules of parties h as just been retained Counsel has not had an o; pportunity . to review the voluminous rece ived to date. documents b. After meetin: ig and conferring as required by rule 212 of the (specify): California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the follow ing 21 Case management orders Previous case management orders in this case are (check one): ‘| none [J attached as Attachment 21. 22, Total numberof pages attached (if any): 3 | am completely familiar with this case and will be ful raised by this statement, and will possess the lly prepa red to discuss the status of di iscovery authority to enter into stipulations an these issues and ADR, as well as other issues conference, including the written authority of the party at the time of the case management where required, Date: January 20, 2005 Vicks, Hartigan (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) > Ven. | (SIGNATURE RTY OR ATTORNEY), (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) » {SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) i] Additional signatures are attached CNM-110 (New July 1, 2002) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pago 4 ors 01/20/05 THU 15:52 [TX/RX NO 8836] @005 1/28/2865 15:54 9164438869 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 66/89 @ ® ATTACHMENT 6.¢ CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NAME: Edward Ric’ Meline,et _v. Jac! (eline, ef COURT AND CASE NUMBER: Butte County Superior Court Case No. 127180 01/21/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. 8 Calavi 3 Cot Sut land Jenni ¢ and Michael Claus Calaveras County Superior Court Case No. CV 29679 02/10/05: TRIAL @ 9:00 a,m., Dept. 6; 5 days alaveras Count erland Moore) v. ifer Clause ai Michael Clau:; Calaveras County Superior Court Case No. CV 29679 02/23/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 59 Elizabeth Pidwerbecki v. Meli: cotti Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 024806368 03/08/05: TRIAL @ 8:30 a.m., De pt. 47; 5 days jzabeth Pidw iv. Meli Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 02AS06368 03/11/05; FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE, @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. WEO 2 er i v. Tim Woo) al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No.: $C080735 03/25/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. Master Calendar Chandra Thomas v. County of Placer Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV 15658 03/30/05: TRIAL, @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. WEO; 6 days Kemper Primary v. Tim Woolley, et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No.: $C080735 04/05/05: TRIAL, Dept. Master Calendar; 17 days Chandra Thomas v. County of Placer Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-15658 04/05/05: TRIAL; @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 2; 5 days (NO SETTLEMENT CONF. SET) ArT: av. con Yolo County Superior Court Case NO. PM03-1640 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page t of 3 01/20/05 THU 15:52 [TX/RX NO 8836} M006 (81/20/2685 15:54 9164430869 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 87/83 @ e 04/13/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. 20 Jefferson/Janet fferson v. a J. Darl) Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-226054 04/18/05 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 10:00 a.m., Dept. TBD County o; evi vy. James t al. Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 69886 4/29/05: FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE, @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. G lenas V. chnologi Los Angeles County (Pomona) Superior Court Case No.: KC041694 5/02/05: TRIAL, @ 9:00 a.m., Dept. G; 12 days Gary Du is v.S. Cott hnologie: Los Angeles County (Pomona) Superior Court Case No.: KC041 694 05/02/05; SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 1:30 p.m., Dept. 11 i ich v. Der oultry,et San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.: CV015399 05/06/05: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE @ 11:00 a.m., Dept. TBD Count Neva es Johns: et al. Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 69886 05/13/05; SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. Master Calendar and v. ScottR a Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV 17231 05/16/05: TRIAL (7 days) @ 1:30 p.m., Dept.:11 obin. Ich v. Poult et al. San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No.: CV015399 05/17/05: TRIAL (17 days) @ 9:00 a.m., Dept.: TBD County of Nevada v. James Johnston, et al. Nevada County Superior Court Case No.: 69886 05/19/05: TRIAL (3 weeks): @ 8:30 a.m., Dept. 20; 10 days up to three weeks € Jane: on Vv. _Darli Sonoma County Superior Court Case No.: SCV-226084.CV-3 068 05/24/05: TRIAL (17 days), Dept.:. Master Calendar uben Herm: ct al, v. Scott Reuter, et al. Placer County Superior Court Case No.: SCV 17231 05/25/05: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE @ 9:00a.m., Dept. Master Calendar County of Sutter v. William Sweet Sutter County Superior Court Case No.: CV CS 03-2063 ATTACHMENT 6.c; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page 2 of 3 01/20/05 THU 15:52 (TX/RX NO 8836] [007 (01/20/2005 15:54 9164430863 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 48/89 ® @ 07/12/05: TRIAL (7 days), Dept.: Master Calendar Co of Sutterv. Willi Sweet Sutter County Superior Court Case No.: CV CS 03-2063 07/22/05: TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE @ 1:30p.m., Dept. 4 avel ion v. Co of. Shasta County Superior Court Case No.: 144236 07/26/05: TRIAL (2 days), Dept.: Master Calendar elk v. inty of Shasta Shasta County Superior Court Case No.: 144236 08/23/05: TRIAL (5-8 days) Dept: TBD Anita Tyree v. Michael John Gourley, et al, Mariposa County Superior Court Case No.: 8145 ATTACHMENT 6.¢; CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, Page3 of 3 01/20/05 THU 15:52 ITX/RX NO 8836] [go08 81/26/2085 15:54 9164430869 MCMURCHIE. PAGE 99/89 ® ® . PROO OF SERV FICE I, Dusty A. James, hereby declare and state that I am over the age of eighteen years, employed in the County of Sacramento, California, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1030 - 15th Street, Suite 300, Sacramento , California 95814, Iam readily familiar with the daily practice of the Jaw offices of McMurchie, Weill, Lenahan, Lee, Slater & Pearse LLP, of collecting and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On the date below, I served the CASE MANAGEMENT 10 STATEMENT, on the following parties: I} Nels A. Christensen John Jeffrey Carter 12 Christensen & Schwartz, LLP 1 jovernors Lane Attomey at Law 13 Chico, CA 95926 P.O. Box 3606 Chico, CA 95927 14 Richard L. Crabtree William A. Ward Attomey at Law Attomey at Law 15 34 Manzanita Court, Suite 110 9 Williamsburg Lane Chico, Ca 95926 Chico, CA 95926 16 James B. Berglund 17 Attorney at Law 1639 Bird Street 18 Oroville, CA 95965 19 20 XX §Birst-class mai P for collection and mailing on the patties in 'Y MAIL) I laced each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid for ran said action. 21 (BYC FIED MAIL) I placed each such sealed envel Prepai for certi ified ma’ 1:il, return receipt requested, for ope, with postage thereon full collection and mailing on the 22 parties in said action. 23 (BY PERSONAL SER ‘VICE) I personally delivered by hand said docu addressee(s) noted abov e. ments to the 24 (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document 25 telephone number(s) indicated to the addressee(s)i(s) noted to be transmitted by facsimile to the above, 26 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 27 foregoing is true and correct, and that this decla ration was executed on January 20, 2005 in < 28 Sacramento, California. DU ) AC) gM Oe Proof of Service 01/20/05 THU 15:52 (TX/RX NO 8836] [@oog9