arrow left
arrow right
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Meline, Edward Richard et al vs Jessee, Nelda F et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (NameJar Nels A. “CHRTSTENSEN Christensen & SCHWARZ, (Bar LLP # number, and address): 037410) " FOR COURT USE ONLY CM-1 1o 1 Governors Lane Chico, California _ n 95926 TELEPHONENo.( 530) 343—5875FAXN0. (Optional): (53o) 343—6454 EMAIL ADDRESS (Optional): F Butte County F uperior Court ATrORNEYFORm/ameJACK MELINE and SHARON MELINE, Defendants l I SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE Court ’Street DEC E/ STREHADDREss: One E 0 6 2002 MNLINGADDRESS; One Court Street cm/ANDZIPcODE: Oroville, California 95965 By BRANCH NAME: eputy PLA'NT'FF/PET'T'ONERi Edward Richard Meline, etc. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Meline and Sharon Meline, et Jack a CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER; (Check one): UNLIMITED‘CASE (Amount demanded E LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded is $25,000 127 18 0 \ exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: December 9, 2 0 02 Time: 3 : 00 p.m. Dept: TBA Div.: Room: Address of court (ifdifferent from the address above): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specied information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statementissubmitted by party (name): JACK MELINE and b. E This-statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): SHARON MELINE 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was‘led on (date): b. D The cross-complaint, if any. was led on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) E 3. a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served. or have b. E The following parties named in the complaint or cross~complaint appeared, or have been dismissed. (1) E: have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) E have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) E have had a default entered against them (specify names): C- D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature ofinvo/vementin case, and the date they may be served): by which 4. Description of case a, Type of case in ’ complaint E cross-complaint (describe, including causes ofaction): Partition of real property. Page10' 4 F Ad df M d I I U CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT . CM-I Io [New JuIy I. 2002] Maggy; LexisNaxm-Aulomalezl California Judicial Council Forms PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: EDWARD YICHARD MELINE, etc . CASE NUMBER: 127 18 0 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:JACK MELINE and SHARON MELINE, et al. 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (prelsonal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings.If equitable reliefis sought, describe the nature of the relief.) Partition of real property. E (lfmore space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) ' 5. Jury or nonjury trial V The party or parties request E a jury trial a nonjury trial (ifmore than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): x , . Trial date 6. a. b. E Thetriai has been setforrdate): No trial date has been set.This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the ling of the complaint (if "0t, exp/afliThe case will be ready for trial by July, 2003. c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. days (specifynumber):Three (3) b. E hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial in the caption by the attorney or party listed ' D by the following: Attorney: ”9.1.0579! Firm: Address: Telephone number: Fax number: . ' E-mail address: . g. Party represented: E Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9. Preference , E This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a, Counsel E has E has not provided the ADR information package identied in rule 201 .9 to the client and has reviewed ADR optionszwith the client. b. E All parties have agreed to a form of ADR. ADR will be completed by (date): C- The case has gone to an ADR process (indicate status): ' CM-110[New July 1. 2002] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 4 LexisNaxlr-Aurorrraled California Judicial Council For/rm CASENUMBER pLAmTIFF/PETITIONER; EDWARDYICHARD MELINE, etc. 127180 —DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:JACK MELINE and SHARON MELINE, et al. 10. d. The party or parties are willing to participate in (check all that apply): (1) Mediation (2) D Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .12 (discovery to close 15 days before arbitration under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 161 2) (3) E Nonbinding judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .12 (discovery to remain open until 30 days before trial; order required under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1612) (4) Bindingjudicialarbitration (5) Binding private arbitration (6) Neutral case evaluation (7) E Other (specify): E This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. f. in Code of Civil Plaintiff elects to refer this case tojudicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specied Procedure section 1141 .1 1. g. This Case is exempt fromjudicial arbitration under rule 1600.5 of the California Rules of Court (specify exemption): 11. Settlement conference E The party or parties are willing to participate in an early settlement conference (specify when): 12. Insurance a. E Insurance carrier, if any, for party ling this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: ‘ E Yes E No Coverage issues will signicantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 13. Jurisdiction . indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case. and describe the status. E Bankruptcy Other (specify): Status: 14. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination E There are companion, underlying, or related cases. Name of case: (1) (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: , E Additional cases are described in Attachment 14a. b. A motion to E consolidate coordinate will be led by (name party): 15. Bifurcation The party or parties intend to lea motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the followingIssues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons). 16.. Other motions E The party or parties expect to lethe following motions before trial (specify moving party, type ofmotion, and issues): CM"1°‘“°wJ"'V‘-2°°21- CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT . . LaxIsNaxi.WAulnma!ed Califomla Judicial Comm] Forms PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:EDWARD ECHARD MELINE, etc . CASE NUMBER 12 7 l ' 8O _DEFENDANT/RESP0NDENT;JACK MELINE and SHARON MELINE, et al. 17. Discovery a. C3 The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. The following disbovery will be completed by the date specied (descn'be all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date No discovery has been undertaken. It is anticipated that some, if not all, _of the involved parties will be able to agree upon partition of the subject real property. Because of the possibility of such agreement, the nature and extent of potential discovery is not presently known. c. E The following discovery issues are anticipated (specify): 18 Economic Litigation a E ThisIs a limited civil case (i e., the amount demandedIs $25, 000 or less) and the economic litigation proceduresIn Code of Civil Procedure sections 90 through 98 will apply to this case. b. E This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be led (if checked explain specically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or tn'al should not apply to this case). 19. Otherissues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference(specify):The I involved parties have engaged in substantial negotiations, but have apparently reached an impasse. Mediation may be helpful to resolve the impasse. 20. Meet and confer a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 212 of the California Rules of Court (ifnot; explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 212 of the California Rules of Court the parties agree on the following (specify) 21. Case management orders Previous case management orders in this case are (check one): D none attached as Attachment 21 . 22. Total number of pages attached (if any): l am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and ADR, as well as other issues raised by this statement. and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date- December 5, 2002 NELS A. CHRISTENSEN (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) M Q (SIGNATURE 0F PARTY 0R ATTORNEY) V (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) E Additional signatures are attached °M'“°l”3“"'Y‘-2°°2’ CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT . . . .. chuNexm'Amomaled .. CalIforma JudIcra/ Courier! Forms PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL - CCP 1013a, 2015.5 l'\) ’1, LISA J. FANos, declare'that: l. I am a resident of and employed in the County of Butte, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is as follows: l Governors Lane, Chico, Butte County, California 95926. 2. On December 5, 2002, I served the following: Case Management Statement 10 on the interested parties in said action, by following ordinary 11 business practice, placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, for collection and mailing with the United States 12 Postal Service where it would be deposited for first class de— livery, with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States 13 Postal Service at Chico, California, that same day in the ordinary course of business, addressed as follows: 14 15 Mr. John Jeffery Carter Mr. W. Z. Jefferson Brown Carter Law Office Price and Brown 16 Post Office Box 3606 Post Office Box 1420 Chico, California 95927 Chico, California 95927 17 Mr. Stephen Meline IV 18 Post Office Box 273 Chico, California 95927 19 20 3. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing 21 is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on December 5, 2002, at Chico, Butte County, California. 22 23 24 LISA J. @ANOS 25 26 LAW OFFICES 0F CHRIsnmsm & SCHWARZ, LL? 1 Governors Lane Chico, California 95926 Phone: 530/343-5875 Fax: 550/343-6454