arrow left
arrow right
  • MARSHA LEVINSON et al VS. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CORPORATION et al SUBROGATION/INSURANCE document preview
  • MARSHA LEVINSON et al VS. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CORPORATION et al SUBROGATION/INSURANCE document preview
  • MARSHA LEVINSON et al VS. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CORPORATION et al SUBROGATION/INSURANCE document preview
  • MARSHA LEVINSON et al VS. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CORPORATION et al SUBROGATION/INSURANCE document preview
  • MARSHA LEVINSON et al VS. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CORPORATION et al SUBROGATION/INSURANCE document preview
  • MARSHA LEVINSON et al VS. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CORPORATION et al SUBROGATION/INSURANCE document preview
						
                                

Preview

OANA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Sep-10-2009 3:54 pm Case Number: CGC-08-482411 Filing Date: Sep-10-2009 3:53 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02612828 ORDER FOR PUBLICATION OF SUMMONS MARSHA LEVINSON et al VS. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, A CORPORATION et z 001002612828 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oD wnt nw F&F YY = 3 a is _ Marcus Daniel Merchasin, SBN 55927 : ' Attorney and Counselor at Law a 582 Market Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone Number: 1-415-678-2700 _ SEP 10 2009 “ bee yeypi Clerk 2 : ly Attomey for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CASE NUMBER: CGC-08-482411 [PROPOSEB] ORDER FOR PUBLICATION OF SUM- MONS Code Civ. Proc. § 415.10 - 415.50 MARSHA LEVINSON, ET AL., Plaintiff, Vv. FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, ETC., ET AL., Defendants. BY FAX This Court has read and considered the Application of Plaintiffs Marsha Levinson and Leon Tay- Le ee Ne Ne Nt ee lor for an order directing service of the Summons on Defendants David and Changwin Bardin by publication, and the evidence presented in support of the application, and it appears to the satisfac- tion of the Court that Defendants David and Changwin Bardin cannot be served with reasonable ditigence in any other manner set forth in Code of Civ. Proc. § 415.10 through 415.30. The Court also finds that Plaintiffs have stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against Defendants Davit and Changwin Bardin. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: Service of the Summons in this action on Defendants David and Changwin Bardin shall be ac- complished by publication in the Reno Gazette Journal and the Sacramento Bee, newspapers pub- lished in the State of California and the State of Nevada, and designated as the newspapers most likely to give actual notice to the Defendants. Page Number - V [Proposed] Order for Publ cation of Summonswo my A nM Fw N = Ss W The publication shall be made once a week for four successive weeks. If Defendants’ address is ascertained prior to the expiration of the time prescribed for publication of the summons, a copy of the Summons and Complaint and of the Order for Publication shall im- mediately be mailed to Defendants. This Order does not preclude service upon Defendants David and Changwin Bardin in any other manner specified in Code of Civ. Proc. § 415.10 through 415.30, which service supersedes the serv- ice by publication. Dated: oats AAT L504 Judge of the Superior Court” ~ JAMES J. McBRIDE Page Number - 2 [Penposed| Order for Publication of Summons