arrow left
arrow right
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
  • BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al CONSTRUCTION document preview
						
                                

Preview

IPMN SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Nov-10-2014 4:08 pm Case Number: CGC-08-478453 Filing Date: Nov-10-2014 4:08 Filed by: SHAWNA VANTREE Juke Box: 001 Image: 04685493 ORDER BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC et al 001004685493 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oe ND HW BB YW NY N Ye YN YBN NN NY He Be eB ee ewe ew ee oe NOD WwW BF YBN =F SO we AAA Fa HTzS FLL 1 Francisco ‘County Superior Court NOY 1 201d CLERICOF THE. CouRT BY: __ a Zaweewue I agi SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO BEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY Case No. CGC — 08-478453 ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR VS. November 10, 2014 CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LLC, ET AL.. Defendants. Theld a case management conference (CMC) this date. The firm trial date is November 9, 2015. SOM must file its answer not later than November 17, 2014. SOM must disclose experts not later than January 5, 2015. The parties agree that the Discovery Committee and Judge Sabraw should address the timing of discovery including expert depositions. The next CMC is set for December 18, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. The joint CMC statement should discuss the impact of any intervening rulings from the Court of Appeal. Any party may show cause why this court should not apply its Krusi tuling (see order of October 1, 2014) to all parties. Briefs on this subject are due not later than December 11, 2014.Any party may file a brief on the issue, for or against the position that the Krusi ruling apply to all parties. The issue will be argued at the next CMC. “Gg ~~ Curtis E.A. Karnow Judge Of The Superior Court Dated: November 10, 2014