arrow left
arrow right
  • EDWARD REGALADO VS. NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • EDWARD REGALADO VS. NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • EDWARD REGALADO VS. NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • EDWARD REGALADO VS. NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • EDWARD REGALADO VS. NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • EDWARD REGALADO VS. NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED document preview
						
                                

Preview

IOAN SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-20-2009 9:58 am Case Number: CGC-08-474914 Filing Date: May-14-2009 3:26 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02501606 DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT EDWARD REGALADO VS. NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., et al 001002501606 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.” “ C € CiV-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY {Name and Address): TELEPHONE NO. FOR COURT USE ONLY James M. Millar, SBN 130187 415-981-8100 | MILLAR & ASSOCIATES, APLC 120 Montgomery Street Suite 1600 San Francisco, CA 94104 ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff EDWARD REGALADO lsert name of court and name of judicial dstnct and branch court, if any: San Francisco Superior Court Limited Civil Jurisdiction PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: EDWARD REGALADO DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: NORCAL WASTE MANAGEMENT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL CASE NUMBER: X_ Personal injury, Property Damage, or Wrongful Death 474914 XJ Motor Vehicle {]other : Family Law +1, Eminent Domain Jit Other (specify): NOLcar ant.1___- Aconformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return Is provided with the document. - 1. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) OX) With prejudice (2) (2) Without prejudice b. (1) [X] Complaint (2) [7] Petition (3) 7 Cross-complaint fited by (name): on (date): (4) —_] Cross-compiaint fited by (name): on (date): ! Entire action of all parties and all causes of action 1 Other (specify):* ALL PARTIES TO BEAR OWN COSTS. ES OF SUIT Date: May 8, 2009 dames M. Millar, SBN 130187, (SIGNATURE) Attoryley or party without attorney for: EQWARD REGALADO /X] PiaintiffiPetitioner {_] DefendantRespondent {_] Cross - comptainant (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF =! : ATTORNEY PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY} + it ‘Gismissal requested is of specified parties only of specified causes of ~ action only, or of specified cross-complaints only, 60 state and Kentity j A the parties, causes of action, or cross-complaints to be dismissed. 2::TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal Is hereby given."* Dater , > (SIGNATURE) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF aATTorNEY [__] PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) Attorney or party without attomey for: ** I a crose-complaint.oe Response (Famiy Law) seeking affirmative refief -is on fila, the attomey for int (respondent) must sign this consent a consent requiced by Code of Cat Procedure eacSon 581() oF 6). () PlaintitfPetitioner } DefendantRespondent [_] Cross - comptainant (To be completed by clerk) 3. Dismissal entered as requested on (date): 4. Dismissal entered on (date): as to only (name): 5. Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): a. Attorney or party without attomey notified on (date): b. Attorney or party without attomey not notified. Filing party failed to provide ‘J a copy to conform (—_] means to return conformed copy Date: Clerk, by , Deputy iL Teh. - : Page toft ‘enter acnoee REQUESTFORDISMISSAL —< [egal manera sith CIV-110 [Rev. January 1, 2007) ta Bus(Regalado v. Norcal Waste Management, et al, 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 (CCP Sections 1013(a), 2015.5) 3 I, the undersigned, declare that I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, 4 | State of California. Iam over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within cause; my 5 business address is 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600, San Francisco, California 94104. : _ On Tuesday, May 12, 2009, I caused the within, a - REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 9 || to be served on the parties in the action. 10 —XX__ BY MAIL: By placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with u postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at San Francisco, California, addressed to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below, 14 ——— BY PERSONAL SERVICE: By causing a true copy of the above-stated 15 || document(s) to be personally delivered via Special T Messenger to the addressee(s) designated below at its/her/his business/residence address. ‘|| Mark A. Hagopian Manning & Marder Kass, Ramirez LLP One California Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94111 20 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this 21 2 Proof of Service was executed this Tuesday, May 12, 9 at San Francisco, California. 23 L A> 24 PROOF OF SERVICE