On February 18, 2009 a Motion,Ex Parte was filed involving a dispute between Van Degrift, Paul, and Albay Construction Company, All Asbestos Defendants, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Defendants, A.W. Chesterton Company, Bechtel Corporation, Bucyrus International, Inc., Cbs Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Chevron Products Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Coltec Industries, Inc., Consolidated Insulation, Inc., Csk Auto, Inc., Does 1-8500, Douglass Insulation Company, Inc., Durabla Manufacturing Company, Inc., Elliott Company Fka "Elliott Turbomachinery Co.,, Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, Llc., General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The, Goulds Pumps, Inc., Grinnell Llc, Honeywell International, Inc., F K A Alliedsignal,, Jervis B. Webb Company, Jervis B. Webb Company Of California, J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc., Oscar E. Erickson, Inc., Pacifc Gas And Electric Company, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack Of California, Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc., Plant Insulation Company, Quintec Industries, Inc., Santa Fe Braun, Inc., Scott Co. Of California,, Sequoia Ventures Inc., Shell Oil Company, Temporary Plant Cleaners, Inc., Thomas Dee Engineering Company, Timec Company, Inc., Tosco Corporation, Trimon, Inc., Underground Construction Company, Inc., Union Oil Company Of California (Erroneously Sued, Unocal Corporation, Vaca Valley Auto Parts, Viacom, Westburne Supply Inc., Yarway Corporation, for ASBESTOS in the District Court of San Francisco County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 eo nd 12 a2 e503 BE = es 14 me 15 Se SE 16 < = D> 17 n 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 202188.1 1037.27078 MARK A. LOVE (SBN 162028), mlove@selmanbreitman.com ELECTRONICALLY AARON COSTA (SBN 209621), acos! a sclmanbreitinen.corn FILED SELMAN BREITMAN LLP Superior Court of California, 33 New Montgomery. Sixth Floor County of San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94105 AUG 25 2010 Telephone: (415) 979-0400 Clerk of the Court Facsimile: (415) 979-2099 BY: VANESSA WU Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Defendant PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION PAUL VAN DEGRIFT, CASE NO. CGC-09-275076 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA'S v. INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS BP, Defendants. TO ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA intends to make various motions in limine at the time of trial, prior to the selection of a jury, and before the trial judge. These motions are designated on Exhibit A attached hereto. DATED: August 25, 2010 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP Ee By: ie MARK A, LOVE AARON COSTA Attorneys for Defendant PEP BOYS MANNY MORE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA 1 DEFENDANT PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA'S INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 & 1 — Ss 12 e 13 a ve 14 Me 1s BE 6 D> 17 % 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 202]88.1 1097,27078 EXHIBIT A Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to preclude the introduction of evidence concerning the bankruptcy of absent efendants. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to exclude references to punitive damages. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to exclude references to insurance coverage. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to exclude evidence of other "asbestos" lawsuits. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to exclude evidence of "concert of action" among defendants. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to exclude documents dated after plaintiffs last alleged exposure to asbestos. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to exclude use of depositions taken in other actions. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine regarding bifurcation of trial issues. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to preclude comments concerning plaintiff's attendance at trial. Reserved. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine on admissibility on state-of-the-art evidence Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine regarding evidence of breach of implied and express warranty. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to exclude demonstrations prior to court examinations. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine for order re offer of proof. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to require a preliminary showing of actual exposure to asbestos on particular sites before introduction of evidence of unreasonable risk of harm. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion for seventy-two- hour predisclosure of documents and witnesses prior to presentation at trial. Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's motion in limine to exclude witnesses and documents not disclosed during discovery. 2 DEFENDANT PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA'S INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE.OC Wn nw B wW ATTORNEYS AT LAW Selman Breitman LLP 28 202188, 1037.27078 Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California's joinder in all of the remaining defendants’ motions in limine. Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to or Introduction into Evidence of California Safety Orders -end- 3 DEFENDANT PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA'S INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINEATTORNEYS AT LAW Selman Breitman Lip 28 2O218R.1 1037.27078 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION Paul Van Degrift v. Asbestos Defendants (BP) San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-09-275076 Defendant: PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Tam employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action; my business address is 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. On the date shown below, | electronically served the following document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve described as DEFENDANT PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA'S INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 25, 2010, at San Francisco, California. CYNTHIA TLROD 4 DEFENDANT PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK OF CALIFORNIA'S INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE