arrow left
arrow right
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

CiV-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address): lan R, Brayton (State Bar # 8.3. #73685) FOR COURTUSE OMLy 222 Rush Landing Road Novato, CA 94948 - TELEPHONE NO: (415) 898-1553 meno cena (415) 898-1247 ELECTRONICALLY E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionay): arTonnev FoR wana: Plaintiff, PAUL VAN DEGRIFT, et al. FILED Superior Court of California, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco County of San Francisco street appress: 400 McAllister Street MAILING ADDRESS: ' : DEC 29 2010 cyano zip coos: San Francisco 94102 Clerk of the Court BRANCH NAME: BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: PAUL VAN DEGRIFT, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL. Personal {njury, Property Damage, or Wrongful Death [= Motor Vehicte [X] Other : [7] Family Law [__} Eminent Domain CGC-09-275076 [3¢] Other (specify) : Asbestos ~ A conformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return is provided with the document. - CASE NUMBER: 1. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) (_] With prejudice (2) [XX] Without prejudice b. (1) 2] Complaint (2) [_] Petition (3) [2 Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date): (4) _] Cross-complaint filed by (name): . On (date): (6) [] Entire action of alt parties and all causes of action 6) Other (specify);” As to defendant ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC. only. 2. (Camplete in all cases except family law cases.) . [J Court fees and costs were waived fora party in this case. (This information may be obtained from the clerk. If this box is checked, the dectaration on the back of this form must be completed). Date: December 29, 2010 > (QR UGS ¢TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF Trorney [__] PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) {SIGNATURE} ‘If dismissal requested is of specified parties only of specified causes of action Attorney or party without attorney for: only, or of specified cross-complaints only. so state and identily the parties, ve ss My a ‘4 d. Wy he X__ Plaintiff/Petitioner Co Defendant/Respondent causes of attion, or cross-complaints to be dismissed. [J cross-Complainant 3, TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal is hereby given.“ Date: > (SIGNATURE) Attorney or party without attorney for: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME CF Bd ATTORNEY [94 PARTY WITHGUT ATTORNEY) “if a crogs-complaint - or Response (Family taw) seeking affirmative Signs consent requred6y Code of Gy Proceaue secon 39%) (=) PlaintfiPetitioner DefendanvRespondent ord). [1] Cross-Complainant (To be completed by clerk) 4. [__] Dismissal entered as requested on (date): . 5 [__] Dismissal entered on (date): as to only (name): 6. [__] Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): 7. a. [_] Attorney or party without attorney notified on (date): b. [7] Attorney or party without attorney not notified. Filing party failed to provide a copy to be conformed [C7] means to return conformed copy Date: Clerk, by , Deputy Page 1 of 2 Form gop ea fo Manaeion, Use REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Gov God, § 68715} al Rules of Goi rle 31388 Judicial Counct of Califomia ‘ClV-140 [Rlov, duly 4, 2009} www courtinta.ce. gov Poeneotl Bw Lawetnl Aretnmmentard Mendiforuneton TerPLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: PAUL VAN DEGRIFT, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) CGC-09-275076 CIV-110 1 Declaration Concerning Waived Court Fees [The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs .on any recovery of $10,000 or more in value by settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other recovery. The court’s lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case. 4. The court waived fees and costs in this action for (mame): N/A 2. The person in item 1 (check one): a. [__] is not recovering anything of value by this action. b. [__] is recovering less than $10,000 in value by this action. c. [_] is recovering $10,000 or more in value by this action. (if item 2c is checked, item 3 must be completed.) 3.[_] Allcourt fees and costs that were waived in this action have been paid to the court (check one): [J Yes [_] No I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: December 29, 2010 David R: Donadio, fisq,, $.B. #154436 > Can &. Gon (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF[ | ATTORNEY! ] PARTY MAKING DECLARATION) (SIGNATURE) CIV-10 [Rev. July 1, 2008] REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Paga2 of 2 LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council FormsCo ON Aw BR WN PROOF OF SERVICE BY LEXIS-NEXIS E-SERVICE {am employed in the County of Marin, State of California. [ am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 222 Rush Landing Road, P.O. Box 6169, Novato, California, 94948-6169, On December 29, 2010, I electronically served (E-Service), pursuant to General Order No. 158, the following documents: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL (Asbestos) Without Prejudice, as to defendant ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC. only. on the interested parties in this action by causing Lexis-Nexis E-service program pursuant to General Order No. 158, to transmit a true copy thereof to the following party(ies): Attorneys for defendant ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC. Theodore T. Cordery, Esq. Imai, Tadlock, Keeney & Cordery, LLP BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD POBOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 998-1555 100 Bush Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104 The above document was transmitted by Lexis-Nexis E-Service and the transmission ‘was reported as complete and without error. Executed on December 29, 2010, at Novato, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the he nuh Carol M. Wall foregoing is true and correct. ift, et al. v, Asbestos Defendants (BY. San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-09-275076 PROOF OF SERVICE BY E-SERVICE