On November 30, 2009 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mayo, Richard,
and
Does 1 Thru 100, Incl.,
Escalade Capital Group,
Escalade Capitol Group, Llc,
Innovistech, Llc,
Innovistech Properties Llc,
Tse, Alice,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
UN
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
| Document Scanning Lead Sheet
| Jun-30-2010 11:00 am
Case Number: CGC-09-494826
Filing Date: Jun-30-2010 10:59
Juke Box: 001 image: 02896338
ORDER
RICHARD MAYO VS. ALICE TSE et al
001002896338
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.ALBERT LEE -- C.S.B. #161237
Attorney At Law
Post Office Box 330222
San Francisco, CA 94133-0222
Telephone: (415) 215-6868
Attorney For Plaintiff Pole
RICHARD MAYO UUW 9 i
: 91 RR op big
Ge The COU,
aaa
Cong
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
LIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
)
No. CGC-09-494826
RICHARD MAYO,
Plaintiff,
Vv.
ALICE TSE, INNOVISTCH LLC aka
INNOVISTECH INC., ESCALADE CAPITAL
GROUP, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
ad a a Na Na a a St et et
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF RICHARD
MAYO'S MOTION TO COMPEL
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER FORM
INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS
FOR PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS AND PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS WITHOUT
OBJECTIONS AND FOR.
MONETARY SANCTIONS
Date: May 25, 2010
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept: 610
Judge: Hewlett
Action Filed: 11/30/09
Trial Date: 2/7/11
The motion of plaintiff to compel defendants Alice Tse, Jnnovistech LLC aka Innovistech Inc,,
and Escalade Capital Group, and each of them to answer form interrogatories, requests for
documents and produce all documents without objections and for imposition of monetary sanctions came
production of
on regularly for hearing on May 25, 2010, in Courtroom 612 of this Court, The Honorable Everett A.
Hewlett, Jr. presiding.- ~ 7“
1 The Court having read the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion, the
2\| parties having stipulated to a form of order, the parties having agreed not to appear at the hearing, and
3], good cause appearing therefor, .
4 ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Richard Mayo's motion to compel defendants to answer
5] form interrogatories, request for production of documents and to produce documents is moot as responses
6
have been served. The Court does not reach the merits of the motion. Sanctions are awarded against
7|| defendants in the amount of $600.00.
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 | /,
11] Dated: bf 36 / M0 :
e pore superior Court
13} ITISSO STIPULATED ae ‘By TERROR a
Astorn¢y For Defendants
17 Alice Tse, Innovistech LLC
aka Innovistech Inc,, and
18] Escalade Capital Group
22] Albert Lee, Esq.
Attorney For Plaintiff
23|) Richard Mayo
27
28 ORDER -- Page 2
Document Filed Date
June 30, 2010
Case Filing Date
November 30, 2009
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.