On January 30, 2009 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Conte, Anthony,
and
3M Company,
All Asbestos Defendants See Scanned Documents,
Asbestos Defendants B*P As Reflected On Reflected,
Bnsf Railway Company,
Bucyrus International Inc,
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation,
Cbs Corporation, A Delaware Corporation,
Chrysler Llc,
Does 1-800, Inclusive,
Does 1-8500,
Garlock Sealing Technologies Llc,
General Electric Company,
Hennessy Industries Inc.,
Honeywell International, Inc.,
Honeywell International Inc., F K A Alliedsignal,,
J.T. Thorpe, Inc.,
J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc.,
Macarthur Company,
Owens-Illinois, Inc.,
Parker Hannifin Corporation,
Plant Insulation Company,
Quintec Industries, Inc.,
The Budd Company,
Union Pacific Railroad Company,
Viacom And Not The Claims Against Cbs Corporation,
Viacom, Inc.,
Western Asbestos Company,
Western Macarthur Company,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
KC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
dan-04-2011 1:35 pm
‘Case Number: CGC-09-275046
Filing Date: Jan-03-2011 2:14
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03078908
JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT
ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTEL
001C03078908
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Gordon & Rees LLP
101 West Broadway, Suite 2000
San Diego, CA 92101
ROGER M. MANSUKHANI (SBN: 164463)
STEVEN SOBEL (SBN: 177210) F 5 I LED
K.C. SWISHER (SBN: 245238) lounty of San Fréncisco
GORDON & REES LLP
101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 JAN ~ 3 2044
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone; (619) 696-6700
Facsimile: (619) 696-7124 CLERK OF THE COURT
By: ‘am
lity ha
Attomeys for Defendant
HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC.
IMAGED
JAN ~ 3 201
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CASE NO. CGC-09-275046
Complaint fiJed: 01/30/09
PROPOSED] supaysent frvdeferdas
Judge: Hon.'Harold E. Kabn
Dept.: 220
ANTHONY CONTE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B**P) As
Reflected on Exhibits B, B-1, C, F, G; and
DOES 1-8500; and SEE ATTACHED LIST.
On November 19, 2010, the Court GRANTED Defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc.’s
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to all allegations and claims in the Complaint filed by
Plaintiff ANTHONY CONTE against defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. in its entirety without
leave to amend.
By reason of said ruling:
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1. That judgment is entered in favor of Hennessy Industries, Inc. and against
Plaintiff ANTHONY CONTE as to all claims and causes of action alleged by Plaintiff in the
Complaint against defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc.;
2. That Plaintiff ANTHONY CONTE take nothing by way of his Complaint against
defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. and;
-l-
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
-2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2
E 12
ae 14
o28 16
Boy
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ZRCH/105663418853903V.1
3. That defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. is entitled to and shall recover its cost of
suit in an amount to be determined by timely filed memoranda of costs.
DATED: JAN --3 2018 aQ @
Hon. Harold E. Kahn
Judge of the Superior Court
» 31 504-6
CONTE v- ASB. DEFTS -
Ze
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
January 03, 2011
Case Filing Date
January 30, 2009
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.