arrow left
arrow right
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

KC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet dan-04-2011 1:35 pm ‘Case Number: CGC-09-275046 Filing Date: Jan-03-2011 2:14 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03078908 JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTEL 001C03078908 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Gordon & Rees LLP 101 West Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 ROGER M. MANSUKHANI (SBN: 164463) STEVEN SOBEL (SBN: 177210) F 5 I LED K.C. SWISHER (SBN: 245238) lounty of San Fréncisco GORDON & REES LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 JAN ~ 3 2044 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone; (619) 696-6700 Facsimile: (619) 696-7124 CLERK OF THE COURT By: ‘am lity ha Attomeys for Defendant HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC. IMAGED JAN ~ 3 201 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CASE NO. CGC-09-275046 Complaint fiJed: 01/30/09 PROPOSED] supaysent frvdeferdas Judge: Hon.'Harold E. Kabn Dept.: 220 ANTHONY CONTE, Plaintiff, vs. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B**P) As Reflected on Exhibits B, B-1, C, F, G; and DOES 1-8500; and SEE ATTACHED LIST. On November 19, 2010, the Court GRANTED Defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to all allegations and claims in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff ANTHONY CONTE against defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. in its entirety without leave to amend. By reason of said ruling: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That judgment is entered in favor of Hennessy Industries, Inc. and against Plaintiff ANTHONY CONTE as to all claims and causes of action alleged by Plaintiff in the Complaint against defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc.; 2. That Plaintiff ANTHONY CONTE take nothing by way of his Complaint against defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. and; -l- [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT -2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 E 12 ae 14 o28 16 Boy 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ZRCH/105663418853903V.1 3. That defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. is entitled to and shall recover its cost of suit in an amount to be determined by timely filed memoranda of costs. DATED: JAN --3 2018 aQ @ Hon. Harold E. Kahn Judge of the Superior Court » 31 504-6 CONTE v- ASB. DEFTS - Ze [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT