arrow left
arrow right
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • ANTHONY CONTE VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS B*P AS REFLECTED ON REFLECTED et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRAYTON*®PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD PO BOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 Oo Se HM KB wh BR BW Be i o il ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ., 8.B, #73685 LLOYD F. LEROY, ESQ., 5.B. #203502 RICHARD M. GRANT, ESQ., §.B. #55677 ELECTRONICALLY BRAYTON®&PURCELL LLP FILED somes fondive Road Superior Court of California, P.O. Box 6169 County of San Francisco Novato, California 94948-6169 JAN 18 2011 Gis) 898-1555 Clerk of the Court ‘entative Ruling Contest Email: contestasbestosTR@braytonlaw.com BY: MELISSA DONG Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ANTHONY CONTE, ASBESTOS No. CGC-09-275046 Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF LLOYD F. LEROY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL; NOTICE OF ELECTION TO PROCEED UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.124 [C.C.P. § 904.1] vs. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B#P) 1. Tam an attorney admitted to practice before all courts of the State of California. I am a junior partner in the firm of Brayton ¢ Purcell LLP, attorneys of record for Plaintiff- Appellants, ANTHONY CONTE, herein. 2. The August 24, 2010 proceeding designated in this appeal, is the same record as designated in the PHILIP FOSTER appeal filed on January 10, 2011, San Francisco Superior Court case number CGC-08-274866. Plaintiffs-Appellants have previously made a deposit for the transcript, so no further deposit is required. uy Mt K injured 20925 dtappeliseDEC-LEL 1 IGNATION CN me ree ET OTCo Oo NW Dh BR BR RS Aw BR Oo N SS 16 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true. Executed on January 14, 2011, in Novato, California BRAYTON “PURCELL LLP K Anjured\109254\appeliate\DEC-LFL.w 2 RECORBONADHEAL: NOTIC i IEBUNBER CAD HORNA ROLES OF Cour,oO Oe NAH RF WN PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL 1am employed in the County of Marin, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 222 Rush Landing Road, P.O. Box 6169, Novato, California 94948-6169. On January 14, 2011, I served the following document(s) described as: DECLARATION OF LLOYD F. LEROY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL; NOTICE OF ELECTION TO PROCEED UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.124 on the interested party(ies) in this action as follows: HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC. Steve Sobel, Esq. GORDON & REES LLP 101 West Broadway, Ste. 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 619) 696-6700 619) 696-7124 Fax XX BY OFFICE MAILING Lam readily familiar with this office's practice of collection and processing correspondence, pleadings and other matters for mailing with the United States Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Novato, California in the ordinary course of business. | placed in the outgoing office mail, the above-described document(s), in a sealed envelope, addressed to the party(ies) as stated above, for collection and processing for mailing the same day in accordance with ordinary office practices. : Executed January 14, 2011, at Novato, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. / Jane Ehni Z Anthony Conte_v. Asbestos Defendants San Francisco Superior Court Case No, CGC-09-275046