On June 22, 2010 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cathay Bank, A California Banking Corporation,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
and
Does 1 Through 200, Inclusive,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
UOC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Oct-26-2012 4:44 pm
Case Number: CGC-10-500934
Filing Date: Oct-26-2012 4:43
Filed by: JACQUELINE ALAMEDA
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03819724
ORDER
CATHAY BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION VS. RAYMOND
XIANG ZHANG et al
001003819724
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.27
can wassociates, Ke
1440 BROADWAY
SUITE 1000
OAKLAND, CA 94612
(510) 832-1686
wer
Chijeh Hu (SBN 241271)
CJH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. A.
1440 Broadway, Suite 1000 San Francisco County Superior Court
Oakland, CA 94612 .
Telephone: (510) 832-1686 OUT 26 2012
Fax: -
ax: (510) 251-1155 CLERK OF THE COURT
Attorney for Defendants/Cross Complainants, BY: a Mee
RAYMOND ZHANG, et al. v Sputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CATHAY BANK, a California banking CASE NO: CGC- 10 - 500934
Corporation,
[ ORDER COMPELLING
FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR
Plaintiff, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE
(CCP §2031.310) AND FOR MONETARY
SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF (CCP
v. §§2023.010-2023.030, 2031.300(h))
RAYMOND XIANG KAI ZHANG, et al., | DISCOVERY
Date: October 26, 2012
Time: 9:00am
Defendants. Dept.: 302
Complaint filed: June 22, 2010
The motion of Defendant Raymond Zhang for an order requiring Plaintiff Cathay Bank to
further answer requests for production of documents and to pay reasonable expenses and attorney
fees was regularly heard at the above date and time. The Court has determined that Plaintiff’s
responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Set One are inadequate and objections
should be overruled. Further, the Court has determined that Plaintiff Cathay Bank acted without
substantial justification in opposing Defendants’ motion to compel further responses to requests
for production of documents.
[eRe] ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS, SET ONE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFFWw BR Ww NBN
CSC eo ND
10
li
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
cata associates, KE.
1440 BROADWAY
SUITE 1000
OAKLAND, CA 94612
(510) 832-1666
Production of Documents Nos+2; 354, 5; 6-7; #9, 1014+ Set Ong, by personal service
within oe cos after service of this Order, gv Frew y +
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that monetary sanctions in the amount of $3,500 be
Dated: /o/ fpr (W€
fro [ew i benfor- fp Petonre paris la Wer htte mann. 2
ser
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff s¢rv
SS ens
incurred in this proceeding, paid to Defendants through
fa Tea JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Gethrum co Hes hue hoe
O Pentge ber trelbrk a rerpoed ly
Lbrsert keprncl, Ge atl e-waste 1 [fp
PCCCEPON, Cu rtrls, , abet Contr? Goo
has fretee KR rt Repay, co morhe
Bet Anirert® Tt hang /ocotel
beak, fer Ca) accor rg Pil EA
tt) opertre fur Yen (b [OME A, Cet soley
ao Crdre hoe refeouce Maw Lube of
PrrBice be pase are/ [or (ton artbeer
humker (c),
7
[Re@EBEME| ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS, SET ONE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF
Document Filed Date
October 26, 2012
Case Filing Date
June 22, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
UOC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-26-2012 4:44 pm Case Number: CGC-10-500934 Filing Date: Oct-26-2012 4:43 Filed by: JACQUELINE ALAMEDA Juke Box: 001 Image: 03819724 ORDER CATHAY BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION VS. RAYMOND XIANG ZHANG et al 001003819724 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.27 can wassociates, Ke 1440 BROADWAY SUITE 1000 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 832-1686 wer Chijeh Hu (SBN 241271) CJH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. A. 1440 Broadway, Suite 1000 San Francisco County Superior Court Oakland, CA 94612 . Telephone: (510) 832-1686 OUT 26 2012 Fax: - ax: (510) 251-1155 CLERK OF THE COURT Attorney for Defendants/Cross Complainants, BY: a Mee RAYMOND ZHANG, et al. v Sputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CATHAY BANK, a California banking CASE NO: CGC- 10 - 500934 Corporation, [ ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR Plaintiff, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE (CCP §2031.310) AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF (CCP v. §§2023.010-2023.030, 2031.300(h)) RAYMOND XIANG KAI ZHANG, et al., | DISCOVERY Date: October 26, 2012 Time: 9:00am Defendants. Dept.: 302 Complaint filed: June 22, 2010 The motion of Defendant Raymond Zhang for an order requiring Plaintiff Cathay Bank to further answer requests for production of documents and to pay reasonable expenses and attorney fees was regularly heard at the above date and time. The Court has determined that Plaintiff’s responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Set One are inadequate and objections should be overruled. Further, the Court has determined that Plaintiff Cathay Bank acted without substantial justification in opposing Defendants’ motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents. [eRe] ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFFWw BR Ww NBN CSC eo ND 10 li 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 cata associates, KE. 1440 BROADWAY SUITE 1000 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510) 832-1666 Production of Documents Nos+2; 354, 5; 6-7; #9, 1014+ Set Ong, by personal service within oe cos after service of this Order, gv Frew y + IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that monetary sanctions in the amount of $3,500 be Dated: /o/ fpr (W€ fro [ew i benfor- fp Petonre paris la Wer htte mann. 2 ser IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff s¢rv SS ens incurred in this proceeding, paid to Defendants through fa Tea JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Gethrum co Hes hue hoe O Pentge ber trelbrk a rerpoed ly Lbrsert keprncl, Ge atl e-waste 1 [fp PCCCEPON, Cu rtrls, , abet Contr? Goo has fretee KR rt Repay, co morhe Bet Anirert® Tt hang /ocotel beak, fer Ca) accor rg Pil EA tt) opertre fur Yen (b [OME A, Cet soley ao Crdre hoe refeouce Maw Lube of PrrBice be pase are/ [or (ton artbeer humker (c), 7 [Re@EBEME| ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF